Search (53 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.00 
    0.0040670014 = product of:
  0.020335007 = sum of:
    0.020335007 = product of:
      0.040670015 = sum of:
        0.040670015 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040670015 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.00 
    0.0034860016 = product of:
  0.017430007 = sum of:
    0.017430007 = product of:
      0.034860015 = sum of:
        0.034860015 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034860015 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  3. Hubrich, J.: Input und Output der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) : Aufwand zur Sicherstellung der Qualität und Möglichkeiten des Nutzens im OPAC (2005) 0.00 
    0.0034860016 = product of:
  0.017430007 = sum of:
    0.017430007 = product of:
      0.034860015 = sum of:
        0.034860015 = weight(_text_:22 in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034860015 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 1.2007 18:22:15
  4. Li, Y.-O.; Leung, S.W.: Computer cataloging of electronic Journals in unstable Aggregator Databases the Hong Kong Baptist University Library experience (2001) 0.00 
    0.0034860016 = product of:
  0.017430007 = sum of:
    0.017430007 = product of:
      0.034860015 = sum of:
        0.034860015 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034860015 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Miller, D.H.: User perception and the online catalogue : public library OPAC users "think aloud" (2004) 0.00 
    0.0034681882 = product of:
  0.017340941 = sum of:
    0.017340941 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017340941 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    1. Introduction Significant research in the design and use of online public access catalogues (OPACs) has been conducted by professionals in library and information science (Borgman, 1996; Carlyle, 2001, Carlyle & Timmons, 2002; Hancock, 1987). However, only limited research has addressed actual library user interaction with and perceptions of online catalogue displays and bibliographic elements (Abrera, 1986; Luk, 1996; Markey, 1983). Retrieval systems, specifically online library catalogues, should consider user perceptions and expectations as an important aspect of design and implementation for improved catalogue efficiency (Hert, 1996). Therefore, it is necessary to examine the online catalogue from a user perspective to determine if it is currently succeeding in meeting the bibliographic needs of users in terms of description, display, navigation, and to provide principles for design of future OPACs. A study seeking to understand better how public library users interact with general OPAC displays and the more specific displays of bibliographic information was conducted in 2003. Research questions focused an 1) user perceptions of the OPAC, 2) the elements in a bibliographic display standing out as most important in selection and identification, and 3) user feedback an the process of using the OPAC. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the larger study findings having implications for future research and online catalogue design.
  6. Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006) 0.00 
    0.0034681882 = product of:
  0.017340941 = sum of:
    0.017340941 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017340941 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
  7. Oehlschläger, S.: Aus der 48. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 12. und 13. November 2004 in Göttingen (2005) 0.00 
    0.0030654743 = product of:
  0.015327372 = sum of:
    0.015327372 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015327372 = score(doc=3556,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.11816074 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Die Deutsche Bibliothek Retrieval von Content In dem Projekt wird angestrebt, Verfahren zu entwickeln und einzuführen, die automatisch und ohne intellektuelle Bearbeitung für das Content-Retrieval ausreichend Sucheinstiege bieten. Dabei kann es sich um die Suche nach Inhalten von Volltexten, digitalen Abbildern, Audiofiles, Videofiles etc. von in Der Deutschen Bibliothek archivierten digitalen Ressourcen oder digitalen Surrogaten archivierter analoger Ressourcen (z. B. OCR-Ergebnisse) handeln. Inhalte, die in elektronischer Form vorhanden sind, aber dem InternetBenutzer Der Deutschen Bibliothek bisher nicht oder nur eingeschränkt zur Verfügung stehen, sollen in möglichst großem Umfang und mit möglichst großem Komfort nutzbar gemacht werden. Darüber hinaus sollen Inhalte benutzt werden, die für ein in ILTIS katalogisiertes Objekt beschreibenden Charakter haben, um auf das beschriebene Objekt zu verweisen. Die höchste Priorität liegt dabei auf der Erschließung von Inhalten in Textformaten. In einem ersten Schritt wurde der Volltext aller Zeitschriften, die im Projekt "Exilpresse digital" digitalisiert wurden, für eine erweiterte Suche genutzt. In einem nächsten Schritt soll die PSI-Software für die Volltextindexierung von Abstracts evaluiert werden. MILOS Mit dem Einsatz von MILOS eröffnet sich die Möglichkeit, nicht oder wenig sachlich erschlossene Bestände automatisch mit ergänzenden Inhaltserschließungsinformationen zu versehen, der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Freitext-Indexierung. Das bereits in einigen Bibliotheken eingesetzte System, das inzwischen von Der Deutschen Bibliothek für Deutschland lizenziert wurde, wurde in eine UNIX-Version überführt und angepasst. Inzwischen wurde nahezu der gesamte Bestand rückwirkend behandelt, die Daten werden im Gesamt-OPAC für die Recherche zur Verfügung stehen. Die in einer XMLStruktur abgelegten Indexeinträge werden dabei vollständig indexiert und zugänglich gemacht. Ein weiterer Entwicklungsschritt wird in dem Einsatz von MILOS im Online-Verfahren liegen.
  8. Oberhauser, O.: Klassifikatorische Erschließung und Recherche im Österreichischen Verbundkatalog (2005) 0.00 
    0.003034665 = product of:
  0.015173324 = sum of:
    0.015173324 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015173324 = score(doc=3701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.11697317 = fieldWeight in 3701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3701)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  9. Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05) 0.00 
    0.0029050014 = product of:
  0.0145250065 = sum of:
    0.0145250065 = product of:
      0.029050013 = sum of:
        0.029050013 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029050013 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:39:22
  10. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.00 
    0.002324001 = product of:
  0.011620005 = sum of:
    0.011620005 = product of:
      0.02324001 = sum of:
        0.02324001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324001 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  11. Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001) 0.00 
    0.002324001 = product of:
  0.011620005 = sum of:
    0.011620005 = product of:
      0.02324001 = sum of:
        0.02324001 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324001 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Greifeneder, E.: Hilfe auf allen Ebenen : ein Beitrag zur Forschung über Online-Hilfen in OPACs (2008) 0.00 
    0.002324001 = product of:
  0.011620005 = sum of:
    0.011620005 = product of:
      0.02324001 = sum of:
        0.02324001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324001 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 13:29:15
  13. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.00 
    0.002324001 = product of:
  0.011620005 = sum of:
    0.011620005 = product of:
      0.02324001 = sum of:
        0.02324001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324001 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38

Authors

Languages

  • e 27
  • d 25
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 48
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes