Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.09912083 = product of:
  0.19824167 = sum of:
    0.19824167 = product of:
      0.39648333 = sum of:
        0.39648333 = weight(_text_:h.f in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39648333 = score(doc=2554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38314402 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.805067 = idf(docFreq=48, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049089137 = queryNorm
            1.0348154 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.805067 = idf(docFreq=48, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Linked data and user interaction: the road ahead. Eds.: Cervone, H.F. u. L.G. Svensson

0.036860436 = sum of:
  0.016907735 = product of:
    0.06763094 = sum of:
      0.06763094 = weight(_text_:authors in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06763094 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22378825 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049089137 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0199527 = product of:
    0.0399054 = sum of:
      0.0399054 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0399054 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17190179 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049089137 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.00997635 = product of:
  0.0199527 = sum of:
    0.0199527 = product of:
      0.0399054 = sum of:
        0.0399054 = weight(_text_:22 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0399054 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17190179 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049089137 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.00997635 = product of:
  0.0199527 = sum of:
    0.0199527 = product of:
      0.0399054 = sum of:
        0.0399054 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0399054 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17190179 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049089137 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

4. 2.2015 9:22:39

0.009962979 = product of:
  0.019925958 = sum of:
    0.019925958 = product of:
      0.07970383 = sum of:
        0.07970383 = weight(_text_:authors in 1801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07970383 = score(doc=1801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22378825 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049089137 = queryNorm
            0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1801)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Subject access to bibliographic data supported by knowledge organization systems, such as subject headings and classification, plays an important role in ensuring the quality of library catalogues. It is generally acknowledged that users have a strong affinity to subject browsing and searching and are inclined tofollow meaningful links between resources. Research studies, however, show that library OPACs are not designed to support or make good use of subject indexes and their underlying semantic structure. A project entitled OPAC semantici was initiated in 2003 by a number of Italian subject specialists and the Italian "Research Group on Subject Indexing" (GRIS) with a goal to analyse and evaluate subject access in Italian library catalogues through a survey of 150 OPACs. Applying the same methodology, a follow-up survey to assess whether any improvement had taken place was conducted five years later, in spring 2008. Analysis of these two surveys indicated that there was a slight improvement. The authors discuss the results of these two surveys, analyse the problems in subject searching in OPACs and explain the recommendations for subject searching enhancement put forward by GRIS. Using the example of Italian OPACs, the authors will attempt to outline some requirements for a subject searching interface and explain how this can be achieved through authority control.

0.009862845 = product of:
  0.01972569 = sum of:
    0.01972569 = product of:
      0.07890276 = sum of:
        0.07890276 = weight(_text_:authors in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07890276 = score(doc=1878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22378825 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049089137 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The quality of large catalogs is uneven and often low, but this issue is underrated and understudied. Library catalogs often fail to communicate correct and clear information to users and their low quality is not simply due to faults, duplications, and so on but also to unwise cataloging standards and policies. While there is plenty of uncontrolled information about books and other publications, the need for good-quality bibliographic information is apparent and library catalogs may provide a trustworthy map of the publishing output, with full control of editions, works, authors, and so on and effective navigation functions, which are lacking in today's information-rich environment.

0.009862845 = product of:
  0.01972569 = sum of:
    0.01972569 = product of:
      0.07890276 = sum of:
        0.07890276 = weight(_text_:authors in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07890276 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22378825 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049089137 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Controlled vocabulary and subject headings in OPAC records have proven to be useful in improving search results. The authors used a survey to gather information about librarian opinions and professional use of controlled vocabulary. Data from a range of backgrounds and expertise were examined, including academic and public libraries, and technical services as well as public services professionals. Responses overall demonstrated positive opinions of the value of controlled vocabulary, including in reference interactions as well as during bibliographic instruction sessions. Results are also examined based upon factors such as age and type of librarian.

0.004988175 = product of:
  0.00997635 = sum of:
    0.00997635 = product of:
      0.0199527 = sum of:
        0.0199527 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0199527 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17190179 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049089137 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22