Search (165 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000) 0.06
    0.06061071 = sum of:
      0.010493284 = product of:
        0.041973136 = sum of:
          0.041973136 = weight(_text_:authors in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041973136 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.05011743 = sum of:
        0.025351325 = weight(_text_:b in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025351325 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052226946 = queryNorm
            0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.024766104 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024766104 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052226946 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
    
    Abstract
    Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.
    Content
    Enthält Beiträge von: FUGMANN, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change; TELL, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters; KING, D.W.: Blazing new trails: in celebration of an audacious career; FIDEL, R.: The user-centered approach; SMITH, L.: Subject access in interdisciplinary research; DRABENSTOTT, K.M.: Web search strategies; LAM, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs: table of contents added to bibliographic records; JOHNSON, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  2. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.05
    0.05011743 = product of:
      0.10023486 = sum of:
        0.10023486 = sum of:
          0.05070265 = weight(_text_:b in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05070265 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.04953221 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04953221 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    b
  3. Lundgren, J.; Simpson, B.: Cataloging needs survey for faculty at the University of Florida (1997) 0.05
    0.046337895 = sum of:
      0.020986568 = product of:
        0.08394627 = sum of:
          0.08394627 = weight(_text_:authors in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08394627 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.025351325 = product of:
        0.05070265 = sum of:
          0.05070265 = weight(_text_:b in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05070265 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey of lecturers and students, at Florida University at Gainesville, to determine the degree to which the information provided in catalogue records serve the needs of library users and the usefulness of including and displaying typical elements of catalogue records. Results indicate the highest level of agreement with usefulness of: title; primary author; date; subjects; other authors; and series. There were moderately high levels of agreement for: summary notes; contents notes; standard numbers; publisher; pagination; and related titles; and lower levels of agreement for reference notes; place of publication; index notes; illustrations; and size
  4. Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002) 0.05
    0.045752674 = sum of:
      0.020986568 = product of:
        0.08394627 = sum of:
          0.08394627 = weight(_text_:authors in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08394627 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024766104 = product of:
        0.04953221 = sum of:
          0.04953221 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04953221 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Rodríguez Bravo, B.; Travieso Rodríguez, C.; Simões, M.G. de M.; Freitas, M.C.V. de: Evaluating discovery tools in Portuguese and Spanish academic libraries (2014) 0.04
    0.042957798 = product of:
      0.085915595 = sum of:
        0.085915595 = sum of:
          0.043459415 = weight(_text_:b in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043459415 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
          0.04245618 = weight(_text_:22 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04245618 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Alonso Lifante, M.P.; Molero Madrid, F.J.: Enhancing OPAC records : evaluating and fitting within cataloguing standards a new proposal of description parameters for historical astronomical resources (2015) 0.04
    0.039216578 = sum of:
      0.017988488 = product of:
        0.07195395 = sum of:
          0.07195395 = weight(_text_:authors in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07195395 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02122809 = product of:
        0.04245618 = sum of:
          0.04245618 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04245618 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05) 0.04
    0.035798166 = product of:
      0.07159633 = sum of:
        0.07159633 = sum of:
          0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03621618 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.03538015 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03538015 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:39:22
  8. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.04
    0.035798166 = product of:
      0.07159633 = sum of:
        0.07159633 = sum of:
          0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03621618 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.03538015 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03538015 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
  9. Efthimiadis, E.N.; Mitev, N.N.: ¬A classified bibliography on online public access catalogues (1987) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    b
  10. Schwarz, B.: Book House: ein OPAC für die Erschließung und Recherche Schöner Literatur (1991) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Eversberg, B.: Bemerkungen zum Sachzugriff im Online-Publikumskatalog (1987) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 1649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=1649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 1649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Nielsen, B.: Educating the online catalog user : a model for instructional development and evaluation: final report (1985) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 2146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=2146,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 2146, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2146)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Janosky, B.: Online library catalog systems : an analysis of user errors (1986) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Nielsen, B.; Baker, B.K.: Educating the online catalog user : a model evaluation study (1987) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 4606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=4606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 4606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Harmsen, B.: Adding value to Web-OPACs (2000) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 4672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=4672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 4672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Estéoule, B.: ¬Les accès publics en ligne (1989) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 5316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=5316,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 5316, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5316)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Hansen, B.: Konzept für die benutzerorientierte Erschließung von Kinderliteratur für einen Kinder-OPAC : am Beispiel von BÜCHERSCHATZ (1996) 0.03
    0.028972944 = product of:
      0.05794589 = sum of:
        0.05794589 = product of:
          0.11589178 = sum of:
            0.11589178 = weight(_text_:b in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11589178 = score(doc=480,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.03
    0.028638532 = product of:
      0.057277065 = sum of:
        0.057277065 = sum of:
          0.028972944 = weight(_text_:b in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028972944 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
          0.02830412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02830412 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052226946 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  19. Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988) 0.03
    0.02830412 = product of:
      0.05660824 = sum of:
        0.05660824 = product of:
          0.11321648 = sum of:
            0.11321648 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11321648 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
  20. Hug, H.; Nöthiger, R.: ETHICS: an online public access catalogue at ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (1988) 0.03
    0.02830412 = product of:
      0.05660824 = sum of:
        0.05660824 = product of:
          0.11321648 = sum of:
            0.11321648 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11321648 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052226946 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.133-142

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 142
  • m 7
  • s 6
  • x 6
  • b 4
  • el 3
  • r 3
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…