Search (163 results, page 1 of 9)

0.09767965 = product of:
  0.1953593 = sum of:
    0.1953593 = sum of:
      0.09620638 = weight(_text_:c in 4513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09620638 = score(doc=4513,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 4513, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4513)
      0.09915292 = weight(_text_:22 in 4513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09915292 = score(doc=4513,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4513, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4513)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

23. 3.2000 15:22:58

0.069771186 = product of:
  0.13954237 = sum of:
    0.13954237 = sum of:
      0.06871884 = weight(_text_:c in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06871884 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.381109 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
      0.07082352 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07082352 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16. 8.1998 11:22:08

Source

The Online catalogue: development and directions. Ed.: C. Hildreth

0.051493615 = sum of:
  0.024006078 = product of:
    0.09602431 = sum of:
      0.09602431 = weight(_text_:authors in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09602431 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23830564 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027487539 = product of:
    0.054975078 = sum of:
      0.054975078 = weight(_text_:c in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054975078 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This short guide describes the process for creating a CD-ROM based üublic access catalog. The authors admit that the material will be outdated by the time of publication, because product specifics change so rapidly. The report is useful, but not completely thorough. Disadvantages to using CD-ROM for public access catalog are listed, but existing methods to overcome these hindrances are not mentioned. The paper also touches on the possibility that CD-ROM-based catalogs may be more than simply an extra service, that they may become full-service catalogs in themselves

0.04579355 = sum of:
  0.021005318 = product of:
    0.08402127 = sum of:
      0.08402127 = weight(_text_:authors in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08402127 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23830564 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02478823 = product of:
    0.04957646 = sum of:
      0.04957646 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04957646 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.04551436 = sum of:
  0.021218577 = product of:
    0.08487431 = sum of:
      0.08487431 = weight(_text_:authors in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08487431 = score(doc=5555,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23830564 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024295785 = product of:
    0.04859157 = sum of:
      0.04859157 = weight(_text_:c in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04859157 = score(doc=5555,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As librarians increasingly try to use their online catalogues to do what used to be done with their card shelflists, they are realizing that some catalogue sedigners and vendors have not paid enough attention to online shelf order classification access. Compares the call number searching abilities of 8 prominent, mature library systems: VTLS, Inlex, Innovative Interfaces, Inc., Data Research Associates (DRA), Geac Advance, Dynix, SIRSI, and NOTIS. Using 5 criteria that are important to cataloguers, each system was tested and rated for its suitability as an online shelflist. *** Special note from the authors: "[We've] become aware of a new version of SIRSI's Unicorn library system-- version 7.0 that changes our rating of SIRSI in a major way. We had rated SIRSI Unicorn a "C" in the paper, but now we would rate version 7.0 an "A". This is indeed a major change. Fortunately, we identified version numbers for each system in the article: we had tested version 6.1 of SIRSI. Thus, version 7.0 of SIRSI Unicorn, available in early 1995, has improved to the point that it meets every criteria used in the article for suitability as an online shelflist. The authors have evaluated version 7.0 with an "A" rating." ***

0.045056913 = sum of:
  0.021005318 = product of:
    0.08402127 = sum of:
      0.08402127 = weight(_text_:authors in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08402127 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23830564 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024051595 = product of:
    0.04810319 = sum of:
      0.04810319 = weight(_text_:c in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04810319 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Since the closing of the Sterling C. Evans Library author/title card catalog on march 6, 1989, librarians have observed a number of patrons who continued to use that catalog, even though NOTIS, the OPAC offered more comprehensive and current access to library holdings. To determine the reasons for this use, the authors prepared a one-page questionnaire, focusing on the users' preference for an inadequate card catalog in an environment which offers a superior OPAC. Card catalog patrons were then surveyed in order to gather data and build a user profile. Survey results were tabulated and analyzed, revealing the underlying reasons for users' preference for the card or online catalog. Conclusions will provide direction for improvements in users' access to online catalogs

0.04186271 = product of:
  0.08372542 = sum of:
    0.08372542 = sum of:
      0.04123131 = weight(_text_:c in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04123131 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
      0.04249411 = weight(_text_:22 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04249411 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.039251614 = sum of:
  0.018004559 = product of:
    0.072018236 = sum of:
      0.072018236 = weight(_text_:authors in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.072018236 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23830564 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021247055 = product of:
    0.04249411 = sum of:
      0.04249411 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04249411 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.028329408 = product of:
  0.056658816 = sum of:
    0.056658816 = product of:
      0.11331763 = sum of:
        0.11331763 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11331763 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.21-31

0.028329408 = product of:
  0.056658816 = sum of:
    0.056658816 = product of:
      0.11331763 = sum of:
        0.11331763 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11331763 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.133-142

0.027908474 = product of:
  0.05581695 = sum of:
    0.05581695 = sum of:
      0.027487539 = weight(_text_:c in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027487539 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.028329408 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028329408 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052273605 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.

Date

21. 4.2002 10:22:31

0.027487539 = product of:
  0.054975078 = sum of:
    0.054975078 = product of:
      0.109950155 = sum of:
        0.109950155 = weight(_text_:c in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109950155 = score(doc=986,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.027487539 = product of:
  0.054975078 = sum of:
    0.054975078 = product of:
      0.109950155 = sum of:
        0.109950155 = weight(_text_:c in 2075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109950155 = score(doc=2075,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 2075, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2075)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.027487539 = product of:
  0.054975078 = sum of:
    0.054975078 = product of:
      0.109950155 = sum of:
        0.109950155 = weight(_text_:c in 2169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109950155 = score(doc=2169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 2169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.027487539 = product of:
  0.054975078 = sum of:
    0.054975078 = product of:
      0.109950155 = sum of:
        0.109950155 = weight(_text_:c in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109950155 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.027487539 = product of:
  0.054975078 = sum of:
    0.054975078 = product of:
      0.109950155 = sum of:
        0.109950155 = weight(_text_:c in 5260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109950155 = score(doc=5260,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 5260, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5260)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.027487539 = product of:
  0.054975078 = sum of:
    0.054975078 = product of:
      0.109950155 = sum of:
        0.109950155 = weight(_text_:c in 7760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109950155 = score(doc=7760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 7760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.025039895 = product of:
  0.05007979 = sum of:
    0.05007979 = product of:
      0.10015958 = sum of:
        0.10015958 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10015958 = score(doc=4368,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:36:10
22. 1.2000 19:41:58

0.02478823 = product of:
  0.04957646 = sum of:
    0.04957646 = product of:
      0.09915292 = sum of:
        0.09915292 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09915292 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47

0.02478823 = product of:
  0.04957646 = sum of:
    0.04957646 = product of:
      0.09915292 = sum of:
        0.09915292 = weight(_text_:22 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09915292 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Eine Replik zu Auer: OPAC und Zeichensatz (Mitteilungen der VÖB 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22)