Search (105 results, page 1 of 6)

0.13344629 = product of:
  0.26689258 = sum of:
    0.26689258 = product of:
      0.53378516 = sum of:
        0.53378516 = weight(_text_:r.p in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.53378516 = score(doc=443,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            1.6301844 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley

0.094360776 = product of:
  0.18872155 = sum of:
    0.18872155 = product of:
      0.3774431 = sum of:
        0.3774431 = weight(_text_:r.p in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3774431 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            1.1527145 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley

0.094360776 = product of:
  0.18872155 = sum of:
    0.18872155 = product of:
      0.3774431 = sum of:
        0.3774431 = weight(_text_:r.p in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3774431 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            1.1527145 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley

0.070770584 = product of:
  0.14154117 = sum of:
    0.14154117 = product of:
      0.28308234 = sum of:
        0.28308234 = weight(_text_:r.p in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28308234 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.86453587 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley

0.058975488 = product of:
  0.117950976 = sum of:
    0.117950976 = product of:
      0.23590195 = sum of:
        0.23590195 = weight(_text_:r.p in 4243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23590195 = score(doc=4243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.7204466 = fieldWeight in 4243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4243)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.058975488 = product of:
  0.117950976 = sum of:
    0.117950976 = product of:
      0.23590195 = sum of:
        0.23590195 = weight(_text_:r.p in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23590195 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.7204466 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Proceedings of the 6th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 8, 1995, Chicago, IL. Ed.: R.P. Schwartz et al

0.04399009 = sum of:
  0.02017808 = product of:
    0.08071232 = sum of:
      0.08071232 = weight(_text_:authors in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08071232 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023812013 = product of:
    0.047624025 = sum of:
      0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047624025 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.041701965 = product of:
  0.08340393 = sum of:
    0.08340393 = product of:
      0.16680786 = sum of:
        0.16680786 = weight(_text_:r.p in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16680786 = score(doc=235,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.5094326 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: HOLLEY, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog; KLUGMAN, S.: Failures in subject retreival; CARLYLE, A.: Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog; MURDOCK, P.R.: Cataloging catalysis: toward a new chemistry of conscience, communication and conduct in the online catalog; DYKSTRA, M.: PRECIS in the online catalog; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The role of classification in online systems; BROADBENT, E.: The online catalog: dictionary, classified, or both?; OLSEN, R.J., CHRISTENSEN, J.O., LARSEN, K.A. u. K. WILLEY: Implementing NOTIS keyword/Boolean searching: a case study; ROLLAND-THOMA, P. u. G. MERCURE: Subject access in a bilingual online catalogue; FROST, C.O.: Title words as entry vocabulary to LCSH: correlation between assigned LSCH terms and derived terms from titles in bibliographic records with implications for subject access in online catalogs; STONE, A.T.: Subject searching in law library OPACs; CHAN, L.M.: A subject cataloging code?; McCARTHY, C.: A reference librarian's view of the online subject catalog; JOUGUELET, S.: Subject access in online catalogs: developments in France; DALE, D.C.: Subject access in online catalogs: an overview bibliography

Editor

Holley, R.P.

0.041701965 = product of:
  0.08340393 = sum of:
    0.08340393 = product of:
      0.16680786 = sum of:
        0.16680786 = weight(_text_:r.p in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16680786 = score(doc=4653,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.5094326 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: USER INTERFACES: HULSER, R.P.: Overview of graphical user interfaces; TROUTMA, L.: The online public access catalog and music materials: issues for system and interface design; MISCHO, W.H. u. T.W. COLE: The Illinois extended OPAC: library information workstation design and development; BALLARD, T. u. J. SMITH: The human interface: an ongoing study of OPAC usage at Adelphi University; Pt.2: ENHANCING THE TRADITIONAL CATALOG RECORD: WITTENBACH; S.A.: Building a better mousetrap: enhanced cataloging and access for the online catalog; BEATTY, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms: the Australian Defence Force Academy experience; Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (MARBI discussion paper; no.46); Pt.3: REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE OPAC AND MOVING BEYOND THE LIBRARY WALLS: TROLL, D.A.: The Mercury Project: meeting the expectations of electronc library patrons; JAMIESON, R.C.: Oriental language materials in online public access catalogues; JUZNIC, P. u. H. PAAR: Cooperative cataloguing in Yugoslavia and the development of the OPAC; PERRY, A.: The PACLink Project at the State University of New York: leveraging collections for the future

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 19(1993) no.3, S.170 (R.P. Holley); Library revies 42(1993) no.5, S.70-71 (D. Anderson) // Jährliche Publikation angekündigt

0.037705794 = sum of:
  0.017295497 = product of:
    0.069181986 = sum of:
      0.069181986 = weight(_text_:authors in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.069181986 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020410296 = product of:
    0.04082059 = sum of:
      0.04082059 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04082059 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.029487744 = product of:
  0.058975488 = sum of:
    0.058975488 = product of:
      0.117950976 = sum of:
        0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 1009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.117950976 = score(doc=1009,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 1009, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1009)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Canadian journal of information and library science 1993, no. April, S.81-82 (D. Mattison); Library review 42(1993) S.48-49 (D. Anderson); Australian academic and research libraries 1993, no. March, S.55-56 (J.S. Goodell); Library resources and technical services 1993, no.1, S.102 (R.P. Holley); Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.4, S.231-232 (P.A. Cochrane); Information processing and management 33(1997) no.4, S.573-575 (C.R. Hildreth)

0.02721373 = product of:
  0.05442746 = sum of:
    0.05442746 = product of:
      0.10885492 = sum of:
        0.10885492 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10885492 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.21-31

0.02721373 = product of:
  0.05442746 = sum of:
    0.05442746 = product of:
      0.10885492 = sum of:
        0.10885492 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10885492 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.133-142

0.024053765 = product of:
  0.04810753 = sum of:
    0.04810753 = product of:
      0.09621506 = sum of:
        0.09621506 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09621506 = score(doc=4368,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:36:10
22. 1.2000 19:41:58

0.023812013 = product of:
  0.047624025 = sum of:
    0.047624025 = product of:
      0.09524805 = sum of:
        0.09524805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09524805 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47

0.023812013 = product of:
  0.047624025 = sum of:
    0.047624025 = product of:
      0.09524805 = sum of:
        0.09524805 = weight(_text_:22 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09524805 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Eine Replik zu Auer: OPAC und Zeichensatz (Mitteilungen der VÖB 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22)

0.023812013 = product of:
  0.047624025 = sum of:
    0.047624025 = product of:
      0.09524805 = sum of:
        0.09524805 = weight(_text_:22 in 7584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09524805 = score(doc=7584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekare. 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22

0.023812013 = product of:
  0.047624025 = sum of:
    0.047624025 = product of:
      0.09524805 = sum of:
        0.09524805 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09524805 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330

0.023812013 = product of:
  0.047624025 = sum of:
    0.047624025 = product of:
      0.09524805 = sum of:
        0.09524805 = weight(_text_:22 in 4513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09524805 = score(doc=4513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050214946 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

23. 3.2000 15:22:58

0.021995045 = sum of:
  0.01008904 = product of:
    0.04035616 = sum of:
      0.04035616 = weight(_text_:authors in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04035616 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.011906006 = product of:
    0.023812013 = sum of:
      0.023812013 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023812013 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050214946 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05