Search (121 results, page 1 of 7)

0.14034593 = product of:
  0.28069186 = sum of:
    0.28069186 = sum of:
      0.14693908 = weight(_text_:work in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14693908 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.6488395 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
      0.1337528 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1337528 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.21-31

0.107399255 = sum of:
  0.022467656 = product of:
    0.06740297 = sum of:
      0.06740297 = weight(_text_:objects in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06740297 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3279419 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.20553327 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.0849316 = sum of:
    0.05567318 = weight(_text_:work in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567318 = score(doc=1429,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061700378 = queryNorm
        0.24583626 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
    0.029258423 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029258423 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061700378 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)

Abstract

Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.

Content

Enthält Beiträge von: FUGMANN, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change; TELL, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters; KING, D.W.: Blazing new trails: in celebration of an audacious career; FIDEL, R.: The user-centered approach; SMITH, L.: Subject access in interdisciplinary research; DRABENSTOTT, K.M.: Web search strategies; LAM, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs: table of contents added to bibliographic records; JOHNSON, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.07471538 = product of:
  0.14943077 = sum of:
    0.14943077 = sum of:
      0.09091392 = weight(_text_:work in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09091392 = score(doc=5162,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.40144894 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.058516845 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058516845 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Bradford OPAC is an experimental prototype OPAC, with a graphical user interface, based on the manifestation concept. It was designed to study some of the problems in catalogues where there are many versions of the same work or complex multipart works. In place of the main entry based approach of one complete record for each item, the OPAC groups together into sets items that are manifestations of the same work. Users are presented with shorter lists of different intellectual works. Items in a set can be sorted, searched and displayed according to user supplied criteria

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28

0.070172966 = product of:
  0.14034593 = sum of:
    0.14034593 = sum of:
      0.07346954 = weight(_text_:work in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07346954 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
      0.0668764 = weight(_text_:22 in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0668764 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Through technology, technical service departments have increased output with unchanged staff levels. Describes how technology has cut the costs of cataloguing at the Phoenix Public Library. A CLSI online system is used. The components are the circulation module, OCLC cataloguing interface, OPAC and dial in access. This has has been linked to an INOVACQ acquisition module. Describes the work structure under this arrangement and the processing of materials

Source

OCLC micro. 7(1991) no.6, S.19-22

0.070172966 = product of:
  0.14034593 = sum of:
    0.14034593 = sum of:
      0.07346954 = weight(_text_:work in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07346954 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
      0.0668764 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0668764 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Argues that the current understanding of main entry is the chief access point for the work in a physical item being described by a bibliographic record. Explains the justification for main entries while drawing attention to the few related problems as they relate to OPACs

Source

Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25

0.070172966 = product of:
  0.14034593 = sum of:
    0.14034593 = sum of:
      0.07346954 = weight(_text_:work in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07346954 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
      0.0668764 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0668764 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports results of the work of a new member of the ELINOR project team to review the development taking place in Z39.50 networked information retrieval protocol with a view to bringing the University's electronic library pilot systems, including ELINOR and the online catalogue into a single, unified system. Focuses particularly on the WWW client server environment

Series

British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22

0.035086483 = product of:
  0.070172966 = sum of:
    0.070172966 = sum of:
      0.03673477 = weight(_text_:work in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03673477 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.0334382 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0334382 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.061700378 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.

Date

21. 4.2002 10:22:31

0.0334382 = product of:
  0.0668764 = sum of:
    0.0668764 = product of:
      0.1337528 = sum of:
        0.1337528 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1337528 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.133-142

0.032142926 = product of:
  0.06428585 = sum of:
    0.06428585 = product of:
      0.1285717 = sum of:
        0.1285717 = weight(_text_:work in 6467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1285717 = score(doc=6467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.56773454 = fieldWeight in 6467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6467)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.032142926 = product of:
  0.06428585 = sum of:
    0.06428585 = product of:
      0.1285717 = sum of:
        0.1285717 = weight(_text_:work in 6813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1285717 = score(doc=6813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.56773454 = fieldWeight in 6813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6813)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Should the physical form or the work in it be catalogued?

0.02955547 = product of:
  0.05911094 = sum of:
    0.05911094 = product of:
      0.11822188 = sum of:
        0.11822188 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11822188 = score(doc=4368,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:36:10
22. 1.2000 19:41:58

0.029258423 = product of:
  0.058516845 = sum of:
    0.058516845 = product of:
      0.11703369 = sum of:
        0.11703369 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11703369 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47

0.029258423 = product of:
  0.058516845 = sum of:
    0.058516845 = product of:
      0.11703369 = sum of:
        0.11703369 = weight(_text_:22 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11703369 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Eine Replik zu Auer: OPAC und Zeichensatz (Mitteilungen der VÖB 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22)

0.029258423 = product of:
  0.058516845 = sum of:
    0.058516845 = product of:
      0.11703369 = sum of:
        0.11703369 = weight(_text_:22 in 7584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11703369 = score(doc=7584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekare. 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22

0.029258423 = product of:
  0.058516845 = sum of:
    0.058516845 = product of:
      0.11703369 = sum of:
        0.11703369 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11703369 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330

0.029258423 = product of:
  0.058516845 = sum of:
    0.058516845 = product of:
      0.11703369 = sum of:
        0.11703369 = weight(_text_:22 in 4513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11703369 = score(doc=4513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

23. 3.2000 15:22:58

0.02783659 = product of:
  0.05567318 = sum of:
    0.05567318 = product of:
      0.11134636 = sum of:
        0.11134636 = weight(_text_:work in 4383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11134636 = score(doc=4383,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.49167252 = fieldWeight in 4383, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

To investigate the extent to which online catalogs arrange together, or collocate, records representing particular authors and works, a survey compared the displays resulting from 5 author and 5 work queries in 18 online catalogs. Dependent variables to measure collocation included the number of items irrelevant records were interfiled among relevant records. Searches for worst-case authors and works associated with large retrieval sets, including 'Homer' and 'Paradise lost', revealed the effects of Boolean versus string matching, query type, and catalog size on the collocation of relevant records. Results of the survey showed that string matching collocated relevant records more successfully than Boolean matching, that author records were collocated more successfully than work records, and, surprisingly, that catalog size had only a small effect on collocation

0.02755108 = product of:
  0.05510216 = sum of:
    0.05510216 = product of:
      0.11020432 = sum of:
        0.11020432 = weight(_text_:work in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11020432 = score(doc=1493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Fifteen recommendations are offered for the improvement of online catalogs within the categories of closer connections to users' work environment, SDI, Downloading, reform of LCSH, enhanced search capabilities, and linking with other bibliographies and text

0.02755108 = product of:
  0.05510216 = sum of:
    0.05510216 = product of:
      0.11020432 = sum of:
        0.11020432 = weight(_text_:work in 3856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11020432 = score(doc=3856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 3856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3856)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews the locations of and access to OPACs that include substantial amounts of material in oriental languages, with particular emphasis on the work of Cambridge University Library

0.02755108 = product of:
  0.05510216 = sum of:
    0.05510216 = product of:
      0.11020432 = sum of:
        0.11020432 = weight(_text_:work in 7910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11020432 = score(doc=7910,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061700378 = queryNorm
            0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 7910, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7910)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the technical aspects of a feasibility study to test a new concept in bibliographic control based on the manifestations of a work. Conventional catalogues are based on the main entry principle which follows from the concept that there should be 1 main entry for each work. The Bradford OPAC project, at Bradford University, UK, aimed to develop a new type of hierarchical bibliographic record structure to cope with the problem of applying the main entry principle to multiple cataloguing records which are manisfestations of the same work. The project involved the storage of MARC data sets of bibliographic records, taken from the Bradford University Library OPAC and the OCLC WorldCat database, in a relational database (MS Access) on a PC. This was then used for an experimental Windows based OPAC, to evaluate the overall success of the idea and any problem areas identified with a view to a more substantial study. The project also aimed to test whether intelligent and responsive software, using a graphic user interface and based on sets of manifestations, could provide a better route to information than a display based on a single work