Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

0.07871344 = product of:
  0.104951255 = sum of:
    0.024459092 = product of:
      0.073377274 = sum of:
        0.073377274 = weight(_text_:objects in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073377274 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.040414643 = weight(_text_:digital in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040414643 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
    0.040077522 = product of:
      0.080155045 = sum of:
        0.080155045 = weight(_text_:project in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080155045 = score(doc=3945,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.32310158 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Purpose - This research project aims to provide a new visual representation of the Artefacts Canada digital collection, as well as a means for users to browse this content. Artefacts Canada Humanities is a database containing approximately 3.5 million records describing the different collections of Canadian museums. Design/methodology/approach - A four-step methodology was adopted for the development of the faceted taxonomy model. First, a best practice review consisting of an extensive analysis of existing terminology standards in museum communities and public web interfaces of large cultural organizations was performed. The second step of the methodology entailed a domain analysis; this involved extracting and comparing relevant concepts from terminological authoritative sources. The third step proceeded to term clustering and entity listing,which involved the breaking-up of the taxonomy domains into potential facets. An incremental user testing was also realized in order to validate and refine the taxonomy components (facets, values, and relationships). Findings - The project resulted in a bilingual and expandable vocabulary structure that will further be used to describe the Artefacts Canada database records. The new taxonomy simplifies the representation of complex content by grouping objects into similar facets to classify all records of the Artefacts Canada database. The user-friendly bilingual taxonomy provides worldwide visitors with the means to better access Canadian virtual museum collections. Originality/value - Few methodological tools are available for museums which wish to adopt a faceted approach in the development of their web sites. For practitioners, the methodology developed within this project is a direct contribution to support web site development of large cultural organizations.

0.07765442 = product of:
  0.10353923 = sum of:
    0.030573865 = product of:
      0.091721594 = sum of:
        0.091721594 = weight(_text_:objects in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091721594 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0505183 = weight(_text_:digital in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0505183 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
    0.022447068 = weight(_text_:library in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022447068 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both

0.0746679 = product of:
  0.1493358 = sum of:
    0.06918076 = product of:
      0.20754227 = sum of:
        0.20754227 = weight(_text_:objects in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20754227 = score(doc=3477,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.080155045 = product of:
      0.16031009 = sum of:
        0.16031009 = weight(_text_:project in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16031009 = score(doc=3477,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.64620316 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Because of the individual character of museums the use of online catalogues to describe objects in the collections in the Netherlands has lagged behind that of libraries. In 1993 the MIRO (Museale Informatieverzorgingen Registratie Opleidingen) project was inaugurated to identify probllem areas and devise solutions. The project identified 4 areas for which training is required for museum staff: description of objects, compilation of indexes, automation in museums, and the use of multimedia systems. Following the project's report the Dutch government has dedicated extra funds for museum automation

0.05837322 = product of:
  0.11674644 = sum of:
    0.08203829 = product of:
      0.24611486 = sum of:
        0.24611486 = weight(_text_:objects in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24611486 = score(doc=3103,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.03470815 = product of:
      0.0694163 = sum of:
        0.0694163 = weight(_text_:project in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0694163 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In 1996, with funding from the Henry Luce Foundation, Jack Lenor Larsen and an advisory committee composed of distinguished museum and design professionals developed Objects Classified by Mediums in response to the concern that existing systems do not provide the tools for comparing information on objects. A common understanding and definitions of terms are crucial to the success of a classification project meant to cross institutional and national boundaries. Objects Classified by Mediums seeks to organize areas of study in fiber, clay, metal, wood, and so on, to allow curators and scholars to compare information on similar methods used, build a conceptual framework for the greater understanding of whole categories of objects rather than as isolated works, and provide a finding tool for cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary investigation.

0.050820265 = product of:
  0.10164053 = sum of:
    0.06354659 = product of:
      0.19063976 = sum of:
        0.19063976 = weight(_text_:objects in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19063976 = score(doc=3759,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.03809394 = weight(_text_:library in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03809394 = score(doc=3759,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The entry provides an overview of the data content standard, Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO), developed by the Visual Resources Association (VRA), and published in 2006 by the American Library Association (ALA). CCO fills a gap in the array of descriptive standards by providing guidelines for visual resources curators, museum documentation specialists, archivists, librarians, or anyone engaged in the documentation of works of art and architecture, objects of material culture, and their images. The entry begins by placing CCO within the context of object and visual image cataloging and the broader framework of data content standards. Following the organization of the guide, which is divided into three parts, General Guidelines, Elements, and Authorities, it summarizes the main features of CCO. Finally, it evaluates CCO in terms of its suitability for use by the metadata communities that form its intended audience, and its sustainability.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.044345714 = product of:
  0.08869143 = sum of:
    0.031425897 = weight(_text_:library in 3720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031425897 = score(doc=3720,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3720, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3720)
    0.057265528 = product of:
      0.114531055 = sum of:
        0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 3720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114531055 = score(doc=3720,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 3720, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3720)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The National Gallery of Canada Library and Archives functions as Canada's national art and supports research on a national and international basis. Given this important mandate and the research interest in art exhibitions, it was important to catalogue the exhibition-related material and to publicize National Gallery holdings. Describes the project of creating an online finding aid for exhibition records and other material related to more than 1900 exhibitions held between 1880 and the present at the National Gallery of Canada. Sets out the goals and many benefits of the project

0.033977814 = product of:
  0.06795563 = sum of:
    0.041019145 = product of:
      0.12305743 = sum of:
        0.12305743 = weight(_text_:objects in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12305743 = score(doc=1464,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.3939312 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026936483 = score(doc=1464,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 34(2007) no.4, S. 264-265 (L.C. Howarth): "At a time when cataloguing code revision is continuing apace with the consolidation of the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), the drafting of RDA: Resource Description and Access, and the development of common principles for an international cataloguing code (International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code [IME ICC]), the publication of a guide for cataloguing cultural objects is timely and purposeful. Compiling this data content standard on behalf of the Visual Resources Association, the five editors - with oversight from an advisory board - have divided the guide into three parts. Following a brief introduction outlining the purpose, intended audience, and scope and methodology for the publication, Part One, General Guidelines, explains both what the Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) guide is "a broad document that includes rules for formatting data, suggestions for required information, controlled vocabulary requirements, and display issues" (p. I) and is not "not a metadata element set per se" (p. 1). Part Two, Elements, is further divided into nine chapters dealing with one or more metadata elements, and describing the relationships between and among each element. Part Three, Authorities, discusses what elements to include in building authority records. A Selected Bibliography, Glossary, and Index, respectively, round out the guide.
As the editors note in their introduction, "Standards that guide data structure, data values, and data content form the basis for a set of tools that can lead to good descriptive cataloging, consistent documentation, shared records, and increased end-user access" (p. xi). The VRA Core Categories, for example, represent a set of metadata elements expressed within an XML structure (data structure). Likewise, the Art Architecture Thesaurus contains sets of terms and relationships, or defined data values. While much effort has been expended on developing both data structures and values, the editors argue, the third leg of the stool, data content, has received less attention. Unlike the library community with its Anglo-American Cataloging Rules [sic though RDA is referenced in the Selected Bibliography], or its archival equivalent, Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS), those in the domain of cultural heritage responsible for describing and documenting works of art, architecture, cultural artifacts, and their respective images, have not had the benefit of such data content standards. CCO is intended to address (or redress) that gap, emphasizing the exercise of good judgment and cataloguer discretion over the application of "rigid rules" [p. xii], and building on existing standards. ... Overall, Cataloging Cultural Objects with its attending guidelines for descriptive metadata and authority control for "one-of-a-kind cultural objects" should merit a place among the "well-established" data content standards of the library and archival communities that CCO references with obvious regard."

Imprint

Chicago, IL : American Library Association

0.030822316 = product of:
  0.061644632 = sum of:
    0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026936483 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
    0.03470815 = product of:
      0.0694163 = sum of:
        0.0694163 = weight(_text_:project in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0694163 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Library and information research news. 15(1992) no.55, S.3-8

0.025048451 = product of:
  0.100193806 = sum of:
    0.100193806 = product of:
      0.20038761 = sum of:
        0.20038761 = weight(_text_:project in 7379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20038761 = score(doc=7379,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.8077539 = fieldWeight in 7379, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Describes the Remote Access to Museum Archive project, a CEC funded project which aims to promote access to museums documentary databases in museums via telecommunications. Describes existing museum databases which are remotely accessible. The RAMA project aims to interconnect the image documentary databases of seven European museums. Describes its progress, and prospects for creation of an electronic museum

0.024459092 = product of:
  0.09783637 = sum of:
    0.09783637 = product of:
      0.2935091 = sum of:
        0.2935091 = weight(_text_:objects in 6101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2935091 = score(doc=6101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 6101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6101)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.01636158 = product of:
  0.06544632 = sum of:
    0.06544632 = product of:
      0.13089263 = sum of:
        0.13089263 = weight(_text_:project in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13089263 = score(doc=4393,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.52762264 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The head of electronic engineering at Florence's Universita degli Studi describes how the department has used digitized imaging and computer reconstructions to aid the restoration and preservation of works of art in museums such as the Uffizi. The dapertmant shares in the MAN (Metropolitan Area Network) Toscana Telecoms project, whose applications include remote access to libraries and museums; and it also takes part in the EU MUSA project, which developed the Vasari (Visual Arts Systems Archiving Retrieval Images) scanner, and in the RAMA (Remote Access to Museum Archives) scheme

0.015925879 = product of:
  0.063703515 = sum of:
    0.063703515 = product of:
      0.12740703 = sum of:
        0.12740703 = weight(_text_:22 in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12740703 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

5. 3.1999 17:40:22

0.015286933 = product of:
  0.06114773 = sum of:
    0.06114773 = product of:
      0.18344319 = sum of:
        0.18344319 = weight(_text_:objects in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18344319 = score(doc=756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This book investigates the principles of cataloguing museum objects; the main aspects discussed are record structures, terminology and conventions

0.015286933 = product of:
  0.06114773 = sum of:
    0.06114773 = product of:
      0.18344319 = sum of:
        0.18344319 = weight(_text_:objects in 4010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18344319 = score(doc=4010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 4010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4010)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.014316382 = product of:
  0.057265528 = sum of:
    0.057265528 = product of:
      0.114531055 = sum of:
        0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114531055 = score(doc=2887,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Describes a project launched in 1992 to computerize the collections of the Musée des Tissus in Lyon. Known as Système d'Organisation et d'Inventaire Étendu a la Récherche (SOIERIE), it is a tool for internal archiving and management and an image databank. Describes the background to the project, data and equipment, consultation, the users and the current situation

0.014316382 = product of:
  0.057265528 = sum of:
    0.057265528 = product of:
      0.114531055 = sum of:
        0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114531055 = score(doc=625,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

EC project PRESTO has completed a survey of the holdings and preservation status of ten major broadcast archives. These archives represent a significant portion of total European broadcast archives, including some ofthe largest individual collections.The main findings are that approximately 75% of this material is at risk or inaccessible and that the collections are growing at roughly four times the rate of current progress in preservation work. This article gives detailed results of the survey, and describes the technical developments being produced by project PRESTO to reduce the costs and improve the effectiveness of multimedia archive preservation projects.

0.012629575 = product of:
  0.0505183 = sum of:
    0.0505183 = weight(_text_:digital in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0505183 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der Bestand eines Fernseharchivs gleicht auf dem ersten Blick einem Irrgarten. Täglich werden große Mengen an audiovisuellen Informationen über den Äther geschickt und gleichzeitig für eine eventuelle Wiederverwendung digital gespeichert. Die Herausforderung für jeden Archivar besteht darin, aus Millionen von Sendeminuten auf Anfrage möglichst schnell das passende Material zusammenzustellen. Mit diesem Problem befasste sich das EU-Projekt Primavera (Personalized Retrieval und Indexing of Media Assets in Virtual Environments for Real-Time Access). Die darin entwickelte Software testet der Österreichische Rundfunk in Wien seit einem Jahr. Sie wurde vom Fraunhofer-Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme (IPSI) in Darmstadt, der tecmath AG in Kaiserslautern und dem Instituto Trentino Di Cultura (ITC) in Trient gemeinsam entworfen. Neuer Suchansatz Suchte ein Redakteur bisher in archivierten Sendungen, bestellte er schließlich mehrere, vermutlich passende Mitschnitte. Viele davon erweisen sich jedoch schnell als nutzlos. Nun kann man bereits am Bildschirm anhand von Schlüsselbildern - den Keyframes genannten Standbildern markanter Szenen - eine Vorauswahl treffen. Einzelne Zugriffe auf das System erfolgen über einen Web-Browser, wobei Suchergebnisse grafisch aufberei tet werden. Damit eine Suche erfolgreich ist, müssen die Archivbestände exakt klassifiziert sein. Mit einem Werkzeug namens Piclasso beschleunigt das Programm die Verschlagwortung von bereits vorhandenen Filmen, indem es deren Klassifizierung sozusagen lernt und auf neu hinzukommendes Material automatisch anwendet. Der Archivar hat dabei aber jederzeit die Wahl, ob er einen Vorschlag übernimmt oder nicht. Zudem kann der Nutzer nicht nurtext-, sondern auch bildbezogen suchen.

0.012229546 = product of:
  0.048918184 = sum of:
    0.048918184 = product of:
      0.14675455 = sum of:
        0.14675455 = weight(_text_:objects in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675455 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Strategies for sharing, managing and accessing cultural heritage information centred around objects, images and related data are being tested currently through a variety of initiatives and resources. These fall into 3 categories: data sharing projects; image data banks; and rights management. Describes 2 data sharing projects, the Research Libraries Group' REACH and VISIION projects, focusing on core categories, standards and interoperability, metadata, and what might be accomplished through REACH and VISIION

0.0119444085 = product of:
  0.047777634 = sum of:
    0.047777634 = product of:
      0.09555527 = sum of:
        0.09555527 = weight(_text_:22 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09555527 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier

0.011569383 = product of:
  0.04627753 = sum of:
    0.04627753 = product of:
      0.09255506 = sum of:
        0.09255506 = weight(_text_:project in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09255506 = score(doc=6100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Twenty years of experience with computers in museums has led from the original 'purely scientific' objectives to a more down-to-earth approach aimed at rationalizing repetitive procedures. Dealing with fragmentary or unclean data is of primary concern. In the 'small museums' project useful techniques from the field of thesaurus applications are customized in daily practice for this purpose