Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Objektdokumentation"
  1. Meyer, U.: Entwurf und Realisierung eines Hypermediasystems : vernetzte Informationen zu ausgewählten Bauplastiken in Hannover (1993) 0.01
    0.01102042 = product of:
      0.1102042 = sum of:
        0.052639864 = weight(_text_:medien in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052639864 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.62401694 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
        0.036031697 = weight(_text_:u in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036031697 = score(doc=362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.6139583 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
        0.021532632 = product of:
          0.03229895 = sum of:
            0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003159283 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
            0.029139664 = weight(_text_:22 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029139664 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
    Type
    a
  2. Maier, G.: Neue Zugänge zu Archivgut über das Internet : Das BSZ als Dienstleister für die Staatliche Archivverwaltung Baden-Württemberg (2003) 0.01
    0.009566567 = product of:
      0.07174925 = sum of:
        0.04025766 = weight(_text_:neue in 1549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04025766 = score(doc=1549,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.55130947 = fieldWeight in 1549, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1549)
        0.021933276 = weight(_text_:medien in 1549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021933276 = score(doc=1549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.26000705 = fieldWeight in 1549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1549)
        0.009119529 = product of:
          0.018239059 = sum of:
            0.018239059 = weight(_text_:online in 1549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018239059 = score(doc=1549,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 1549, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        4.3878925E-4 = product of:
          0.0013163678 = sum of:
            0.0013163678 = weight(_text_:a in 1549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0013163678 = score(doc=1549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1549)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Elektronische Technologien durchdringen zunehmend alle Lebens- und Arbeitsbereiche wie Politik, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Kultur. Vor allem durch die breite Nutzung des Internets formiert sich die so genannte Informationsgesellschaft. Innerhalb dieser haben Archive zusammen mit Bibliotheken und Museen für die Sicherung und Bereitstellung des Kulturerbes einen bedeutenden Stellenwert. Im Zeitalter globaler Kommunikation treten so neben konventionelle Formen des Informationsangebots zunehmend auch neue Wege der Informationsvermittlung. Die Staatliche Archivverwaltung Baden-Württemberg als traditioneller Dienstleister für Verwaltung und Forschung entwickelt sich in den letzten Jahren verstärkt zu einem öffentlichen Informationsdienstleister. Dabei werden auch neue Kooperationsformen eingeschlagen, wozu auch die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ) gehört. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Entwicklung eines kundenorientierten, mehrstufigen Internetangebots, das bis zur Präsentation von digitalisiertem Archivgut auf der untersten Stufe reicht. So wurden in den letzten Jahren neue Lösungen für Online-Findmittel mit Präsentationsmodulen für digitalisiertes Archivgut entwickelt, die die Basis für die Teilnahme an verschiedenen Portal-Projekten bilden. Durch die Digitalisierung von Archivgut besteht die Möglichkeit, interessierten Bürgern, Wissenschaftlern, Studenten und Schülern den Zugang zu den Quellen über Online-Medien wie dem Internet zu ermöglichen. Dadurch können einerseits die wertvollen Originale und Unikate geschützt werden, andererseits erhält der Nutzer unabhängig von Ort und Zeit völlig neue Zugriffsmöglichkeiten auf Archivgut. In diesem Beitrag werden verschiedene Internet-Angebote und Technologien der Staatlichen Archivverwaltung Baden-Württemberg vorgestellt, die neue Möglichkeiten des Zugangs zu Archivgut bilden. Dabei werden folgende Themenbereiche angesprochen: - Abbildung archivischer Information im Internet - Mehrdimensionaler Zugang zu Archivinformationen durch Internet-Portale - Online-Findmittel und digitalisierte Archivalien im Internet - Technologien für Online-Angebote
    Type
    a
  3. Steffens, M.: Bibliothek im Museum : Bibliothekarisch orientierte Sammlungsverwaltung mit dem Datenbanksystem Allegro/HANS (1995) 0.00
    0.0032365387 = product of:
      0.04854808 = sum of:
        0.019602783 = product of:
          0.039205566 = sum of:
            0.039205566 = weight(_text_:29 in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039205566 = score(doc=5393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028945295 = product of:
          0.04341794 = sum of:
            0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004212377 = score(doc=5393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
            0.039205566 = weight(_text_:29 in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039205566 = score(doc=5393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.1, S.51-57
    Type
    a
  4. Saltzman, A.B.: Art slide sets : online access (1998) 0.00
    0.0028852064 = product of:
      0.028852064 = sum of:
        0.008576217 = product of:
          0.017152434 = sum of:
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0063836705 = product of:
          0.012767341 = sum of:
            0.012767341 = weight(_text_:online in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012767341 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013892177 = product of:
          0.020838264 = sum of:
            0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00368583 = score(doc=5188,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Ellender Memorial Library at Nicholls State University, Louisiana has a slide collection including 10,000 slides in 60 sets devoted to art. Describes how the cataloguer solved the problem of entering sufficiently detailed records of this part of the collection on the OPAC of a small college library, using the OCLC authority file for artists' names and NUTPLUS which offers access via any combination of 15 data elements including e.g., aspects of the subject, call and item numbers and location of the works of art. NUTPLUS is now available in a new version, called Ultra-Plus Advanced, from Fairhaven Software of Stoughton, Massachusetts
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:54:29
    Type
    a
  5. Aha, S.: Arbeitsplatz Museum : Grundlagen der Digitalisierung von Arbeitsvorgängen an Beispielen aus der Museumspraxis in Berlin-Brandenburg (1996) 0.00
    0.0026998254 = product of:
      0.04049738 = sum of:
        0.039444286 = weight(_text_:neue in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039444286 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.5401707 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
        0.0010530944 = product of:
          0.003159283 = sum of:
            0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003159283 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Die digitale Revolution: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1996, Neue Universität Heidelberg, 24.-26.9.1996. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
    Type
    a
  6. Schweibenz, W.: Museumsinformation im Internet am Beispiel der Webseiten zweier Kunstmuseen in den USA (1998) 0.00
    0.0026117163 = product of:
      0.03917574 = sum of:
        0.021231882 = weight(_text_:u in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021231882 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
        0.017943861 = product of:
          0.02691579 = sum of:
            0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026327355 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
            0.024283055 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024283055 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
    Type
    a
  7. Im Dickicht der Fernseharchive : Ein neues Archivsystem unterstützt TV-Redakteure bei der zeitsparenden Zusammenstellung ihrer Beiträge (2003) 0.00
    0.0023158782 = product of:
      0.03473817 = sum of:
        0.03429938 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03429938 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10548963 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3251446 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
        4.3878925E-4 = product of:
          0.0013163678 = sum of:
            0.0013163678 = weight(_text_:a in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0013163678 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Der Bestand eines Fernseharchivs gleicht auf dem ersten Blick einem Irrgarten. Täglich werden große Mengen an audiovisuellen Informationen über den Äther geschickt und gleichzeitig für eine eventuelle Wiederverwendung digital gespeichert. Die Herausforderung für jeden Archivar besteht darin, aus Millionen von Sendeminuten auf Anfrage möglichst schnell das passende Material zusammenzustellen. Mit diesem Problem befasste sich das EU-Projekt Primavera (Personalized Retrieval und Indexing of Media Assets in Virtual Environments for Real-Time Access). Die darin entwickelte Software testet der Österreichische Rundfunk in Wien seit einem Jahr. Sie wurde vom Fraunhofer-Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme (IPSI) in Darmstadt, der tecmath AG in Kaiserslautern und dem Instituto Trentino Di Cultura (ITC) in Trient gemeinsam entworfen. Neuer Suchansatz Suchte ein Redakteur bisher in archivierten Sendungen, bestellte er schließlich mehrere, vermutlich passende Mitschnitte. Viele davon erweisen sich jedoch schnell als nutzlos. Nun kann man bereits am Bildschirm anhand von Schlüsselbildern - den Keyframes genannten Standbildern markanter Szenen - eine Vorauswahl treffen. Einzelne Zugriffe auf das System erfolgen über einen Web-Browser, wobei Suchergebnisse grafisch aufberei tet werden. Damit eine Suche erfolgreich ist, müssen die Archivbestände exakt klassifiziert sein. Mit einem Werkzeug namens Piclasso beschleunigt das Programm die Verschlagwortung von bereits vorhandenen Filmen, indem es deren Klassifizierung sozusagen lernt und auf neu hinzukommendes Material automatisch anwendet. Der Archivar hat dabei aber jederzeit die Wahl, ob er einen Vorschlag übernimmt oder nicht. Zudem kann der Nutzer nicht nurtext-, sondern auch bildbezogen suchen.
    Type
    a
  8. Wunderlich, B.: ¬Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung von Bekleidung mit systematischen Ordnungssystemen im musealen Kontext : Wie bekommt man Hemd und Hose in die Datenbank? (2005) 0.00
    0.0023102104 = product of:
      0.034653153 = sum of:
        0.020791892 = product of:
          0.041583784 = sum of:
            0.041583784 = weight(_text_:29 in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041583784 = score(doc=4173,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013861261 = product of:
          0.041583784 = sum of:
            0.041583784 = weight(_text_:29 in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041583784 = score(doc=4173,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    28.11.1999 13:32:29
    27. 9.2005 14:29:52
  9. Frese, K.: Papierarchiv ade! : Großunternehmen der Chemie im Informationsverbund (1994) 0.00
    0.0021190997 = product of:
      0.031786494 = sum of:
        0.031172188 = product of:
          0.062344376 = sum of:
            0.062344376 = weight(_text_:industrie in 8785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062344376 = score(doc=8785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12019911 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7064548 = idf(docFreq=146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.51867586 = fieldWeight in 8785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7064548 = idf(docFreq=146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        6.14305E-4 = product of:
          0.001842915 = sum of:
            0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 8785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.001842915 = score(doc=8785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 8785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8785)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Das kommt in allen Unternehmen vor: Bei der morgendlichen Lektüre der Tageszeitung oder dem späteren Studium der Fachzeitschriften springt dem geneigten Leser ein Artikel mit Informationen ins Auge, die es wert wären, für später (oder den Sankt Nimmerleinstag) aufgehoben zu werden. Was passiert? Man eilt zum Kopierer oder greift ohne Umweg zu Schere, Kleber und Ordner - und ist den Artikel erst einmal los. Später findet man ihn unter Umständen unter einem mehr oder weniger zutreffenden Stichwort noch einmal wieder. Oder auch nicht. Diese Vorgehensweise mag für's Privatarchiv gerade noch überschaubar sein. Große Unternehmen mit umfangreichen Dokumentationen gehen jedoch mehr und mehr dazu über, das klassische Papierarchiv durch elektronische Informationssysteme zu ersetzen. Vorgestellt wird ein Beispiel aus der chemischen Industrie
    Type
    a
  10. Leuchte, U.; Schirmbeck, H.-J.: BIADOK: das Projekt eines automatisierten und rechnergestützten Kunst- und Informationszentrums in Berlin (1992) 0.00
    0.0020635498 = product of:
      0.030953245 = sum of:
        0.029724635 = weight(_text_:u in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029724635 = score(doc=936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
        0.00122861 = product of:
          0.00368583 = sum of:
            0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00368583 = score(doc=936,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Ménard, E.; Mas, S.; Alberts, I.: Faceted classification for museum artefacts : a methodology to support web site development of large cultural organizations (2010) 0.00
    0.0017411247 = product of:
      0.017411247 = sum of:
        0.0049006958 = product of:
          0.0098013915 = sum of:
            0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0098013915 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0036478117 = product of:
          0.0072956234 = sum of:
            0.0072956234 = weight(_text_:online in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0072956234 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00886274 = product of:
          0.01329411 = sum of:
            0.0034927188 = weight(_text_:a in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034927188 = score(doc=3945,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.16900843 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
            0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0098013915 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This research project aims to provide a new visual representation of the Artefacts Canada digital collection, as well as a means for users to browse this content. Artefacts Canada Humanities is a database containing approximately 3.5 million records describing the different collections of Canadian museums. Design/methodology/approach - A four-step methodology was adopted for the development of the faceted taxonomy model. First, a best practice review consisting of an extensive analysis of existing terminology standards in museum communities and public web interfaces of large cultural organizations was performed. The second step of the methodology entailed a domain analysis; this involved extracting and comparing relevant concepts from terminological authoritative sources. The third step proceeded to term clustering and entity listing,which involved the breaking-up of the taxonomy domains into potential facets. An incremental user testing was also realized in order to validate and refine the taxonomy components (facets, values, and relationships). Findings - The project resulted in a bilingual and expandable vocabulary structure that will further be used to describe the Artefacts Canada database records. The new taxonomy simplifies the representation of complex content by grouping objects into similar facets to classify all records of the Artefacts Canada database. The user-friendly bilingual taxonomy provides worldwide visitors with the means to better access Canadian virtual museum collections. Originality/value - Few methodological tools are available for museums which wish to adopt a faceted approach in the development of their web sites. For practitioners, the methodology developed within this project is a direct contribution to support web site development of large cultural organizations.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:31:55
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Type
    a
  12. Rauprich, S.: Wissen durch Informationsstrukturierung : Über die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der Informatik in der Kunstgeschichte (1998) 0.00
    0.0015748984 = product of:
      0.023623474 = sum of:
        0.023009168 = weight(_text_:neue in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023009168 = score(doc=2143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3150996 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
        6.14305E-4 = product of:
          0.001842915 = sum of:
            0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.001842915 = score(doc=2143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Das starke Anwachsen neuer und die Inkonsistenz vorhandener Informationen fordert auch im Bereich der Kunstgeschichte, über neue Verfahren zur Informationsbeherrschung nachzudenken. Information kann nur beherrscht werden, wenn ihre Strukturierung gelingt. Nach einer Übersicht über die klassischen Verfahren zur Beschriebung kunstgeschichtlicher Objekte und ihre bislang praktizierten Dokumentationsverfahren wird ein ganzheitliches Informationsmodell auf der Basis objektorientierter Attributierung vorgeschlagen, wobei die kunstgeschichtlichen Objekte aller Gattungen selbst den Kern des Modells darstellen. Die Taxonomie der Objekteigenschaften wird dabei aus dem Entstehungsprinzip der kunstgeschichtlichen Objekte hergeleitet. Je nach gewählter Sicht werden durch die Bildung generischer Klassen die an sich beliebig vielfältigen Attribute auf ein praktikables Maß komprimiert. Die objektorientierte Attributierung kann so alle Dokumentationsaufgaben, die für die Zwecke der Kunstobjektlogistik bis hin zur kunstwissenschaftlichen Analytik notwendig sind, auf effiziente Art unterstützen
    Type
    a
  13. Donnellier, C.: Micromusee : la base images des collections specialisees de l'ENSBA (1998) 0.00
    0.0014159856 = product of:
      0.021239784 = sum of:
        0.008576217 = product of:
          0.017152434 = sum of:
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 2225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=2225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012663566 = product of:
          0.018995348 = sum of:
            0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 2225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.001842915 = score(doc=2225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2225)
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 2225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=2225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2225)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Type
    a
  14. Küster-Heise, K.; Mitschke, S.: Terminologie in der Museumsarbeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Aspekts der Textilterminologie (2009) 0.00
    0.0012137021 = product of:
      0.018205531 = sum of:
        0.0073510436 = product of:
          0.014702087 = sum of:
            0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014702087 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010854486 = product of:
          0.01628173 = sum of:
            0.0015796415 = weight(_text_:a in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0015796415 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
            0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014702087 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    10. 5.2009 17:29:18
    Type
    a
  15. Wolters, C.: Object databases and thesauri for small museums (1991) 0.00
    0.0011985583 = product of:
      0.017978372 = sum of:
        0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016985506 = score(doc=6100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
        9.928669E-4 = product of:
          0.0029786006 = sum of:
            0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029786006 = score(doc=6100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Twenty years of experience with computers in museums has led from the original 'purely scientific' objectives to a more down-to-earth approach aimed at rationalizing repetitive procedures. Dealing with fragmentary or unclean data is of primary concern. In the 'small museums' project useful techniques from the field of thesaurus applications are customized in daily practice for this purpose
    Source
    Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization: models and methods with applications. Proc. of the 14th annual conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Univ. of Marburg, 12.-14.3.1990. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. P. Ihm
    Type
    a
  16. Cataloging culutural objects : a guide to describing cultural works and their images (2003) 0.00
    0.0010699236 = product of:
      0.016048854 = sum of:
        0.00612587 = product of:
          0.01225174 = sum of:
            0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01225174 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009922984 = product of:
          0.014884476 = sum of:
            0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026327355 = score(doc=2398,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
            0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01225174 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both
    Date
    2.12.2015 11:29:57
  17. Kampffmeyer, U.; Klönne, K.-H.: Moderne Informationsverarbeitung im Büro : elektronische Archivierung und Vorgangsbearbeitung (1993) 0.00
    0.0010317749 = product of:
      0.015476623 = sum of:
        0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 8786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014862318 = score(doc=8786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 8786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8786)
        6.14305E-4 = product of:
          0.001842915 = sum of:
            0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 8786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.001842915 = score(doc=8786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 8786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8786)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Blummer, T.: Objektverwalter : Objektdatenbanken - High Tech Spielzeuge oder Zukunftsmodell? (1997) 0.00
    9.570059E-4 = product of:
      0.028710175 = sum of:
        0.028710175 = product of:
          0.04306526 = sum of:
            0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004212377 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
            0.038852885 = weight(_text_:22 in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038852885 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    5. 3.1999 17:40:22
    Type
    a
  19. Smiraglia, R.P.: Knowledge sharing and content genealogy : extensing the "works" model as a metaphor for non-documentary artefacts with case studies of Etruscan artefacts (2004) 0.00
    8.861628E-4 = product of:
      0.013292441 = sum of:
        0.0049006958 = product of:
          0.0098013915 = sum of:
            0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0098013915 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008391745 = product of:
          0.012587617 = sum of:
            0.0027862256 = weight(_text_:a in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0027862256 = score(doc=2671,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.13482209 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
            0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0098013915 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 19:05:56
    Type
    a
  20. Kemmerling, A.: ¬Het MIRO-project : kennisachterstand in museale informatieverzorging structureel aangepakt (1994) 0.00
    5.525661E-4 = product of:
      0.008288491 = sum of:
        0.0072956234 = product of:
          0.014591247 = sum of:
            0.014591247 = weight(_text_:online in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014591247 = score(doc=3477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        9.928669E-4 = product of:
          0.0029786006 = sum of:
            0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029786006 = score(doc=3477,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Because of the individual character of museums the use of online catalogues to describe objects in the collections in the Netherlands has lagged behind that of libraries. In 1993 the MIRO (Museale Informatieverzorgingen Registratie Opleidingen) project was inaugurated to identify probllem areas and devise solutions. The project identified 4 areas for which training is required for museum staff: description of objects, compilation of indexes, automation in museums, and the use of multimedia systems. Following the project's report the Dutch government has dedicated extra funds for museum automation
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 27
  • d 26
  • f 3
  • nl 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 50
  • m 6
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…