Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.025039895 = product of:
  0.05007979 = sum of:
    0.05007979 = product of:
      0.10015958 = sum of:
        0.10015958 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10015958 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2018 12:06:44
22. 2.2018 12:13:53

0.013743769 = product of:
  0.027487539 = sum of:
    0.027487539 = product of:
      0.054975078 = sum of:
        0.054975078 = weight(_text_:c in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054975078 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.010623528 = product of:
  0.021247055 = sum of:
    0.021247055 = product of:
      0.04249411 = sum of:
        0.04249411 = weight(_text_:22 in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04249411 = score(doc=2119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this global information age, accessing, disseminating, and controlling information is an increasingly important aspect of human life. Often, these interests are expressed in the language of human rights-for example, rights to expression, privacy, and intellectual property. As the discipline concerned with "facilitating the effective communication of desired information between human generator and human user" (Belkin, 1975, p. 22), library and information science (LIS) has a central role in facilitating communication about human rights and ensuring the respect for human rights in information services and systems. This paper surveys the literature at the intersection of LIS and human rights. To begin, an overview of human rights conventions and an introduction to human rights theory is provided. Then the intersections between LIS and human rights are considered. Three central areas of informational human rights-communication, privacy, and intellectual property-are discussed in detail. It is argued that communication rights in particular serve as a central linchpin in the system of human rights.

0.010307828 = product of:
  0.020615656 = sum of:
    0.020615656 = product of:
      0.04123131 = sum of:
        0.04123131 = weight(_text_:c in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04123131 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031284 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker

0.0075018997 = product of:
  0.015003799 = sum of:
    0.015003799 = product of:
      0.060015198 = sum of:
        0.060015198 = weight(_text_:authors in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060015198 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23830564 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

" Im Streit mit Google um Urheberrechte ist eine Gruppe von Buchautoren am Obersten US-Gericht gescheitert. Der Supreme Court lehnte es ab, die google-freundliche Entscheidung eines niederen Gerichtes zur Revision zuzulassen. In dem Fall geht es um die Online-Bibliothek "Google Books", für die der kalifornische Konzern Gerichtsunterlagen zufolge mehr als 20 Millionen Bücher digitalisiert hat. Durch das Projekt können Internet-Nutzer innerhalb der Bücher nach Stichworten suchen und die entsprechenden Textstellen lesen. Die drei zuständigen Richter entschieden einstimmig, dass in dem Fall zwar die Grenzen der Fairness ausgetestet würden, aber das Vorgehen von Google letztlich rechtens sei. Entschädigungen in Milliardenhöhe gefürchtet Die von dem Interessensverband Authors Guild angeführten Kläger sahen ihre Urheberrechte durch "Google Books" verletzt. Dazu gehörten auch prominente Künstler wie die Schriftstellerin und Dichterin Margaret Atwood. Google führte dagegen an, die Internet-Bibliothek kurbele den Bücherverkauf an, weil Leser dadurch zusätzlich auf interessante Werke aufmerksam gemacht würden. Google reagierte "dankbar" auf die Entscheidung des Supreme Court. Der Konzern hatte befürchtet, bei einer juristischen Niederlage Entschädigungen in Milliardenhöhe zahlen zu müssen."

0.005311764 = product of:
  0.010623528 = sum of:
    0.010623528 = product of:
      0.021247055 = sum of:
        0.021247055 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021247055 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18305326 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052273605 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2018 12:13:57