Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.02
    0.0188538 = product of:
      0.0377076 = sum of:
        0.010295319 = weight(_text_:a in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010295319 = score(doc=2832,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
        0.027412282 = product of:
          0.054824565 = sum of:
            0.054824565 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054824565 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05058132 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reference librarians, who are thoroughly familiar with the purpose, scope and arrangement of abstract periodicals, are uniquely qualified for the task of writing abstracts. The procedures described here offer a relatively simple way for them to write acceptable abstracts from the outset. Although research is being conducted in the area of machine generated abstracts, there wll continue to be a role for human abstractors.
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
    Type
    a
  2. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989) 0.01
    0.010740098 = product of:
      0.021480195 = sum of:
        0.012869149 = weight(_text_:a in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012869149 = score(doc=3549,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
        0.008611047 = product of:
          0.017222093 = sum of:
            0.017222093 = weight(_text_:information in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017222093 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05058132 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a theoretical model, based on the Flower/Hayes model of expository writing, of the process involved in content analysis for abstracting and indexing.
    Source
    Information, knowledge, evolution. Proceedings of the 44th FID Congress, Helsinki, 28.8.-1.9.1988. Ed. by S. Koshiala and R. Launo
    Type
    a
  3. Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987) 0.00
    0.004203046 = product of:
      0.016812185 = sum of:
        0.016812185 = weight(_text_:a in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016812185 = score(doc=2738,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Informatics 9: Meaning: the frontier of informatics: proceedings of a conference. Ed.: K.P. Jones
    Type
    a
  4. Fidel, R.: Writing abstracts for free-text searching (1986) 0.00
    0.0029720024 = product of:
      0.0118880095 = sum of:
        0.0118880095 = weight(_text_:a in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0118880095 = score(doc=684,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of abstracting policies by producers of bibliographical databases examined abstracting guidelines which aim to enhance free- text retrieval. Of the 123 database policies examined, fifty-seven (46 per cent) included such instructions. Editors consider contents of abstracts and their language as a primary factor in retrieval enhancement. Most recommend that once abstractors decide which concepts to include in abstracts and in which form to represent them, these terms should be co-ordinated with index terms assigned from a controlled vocabulary. Guidelines about the type of abstracts, i.e., informative or indicative, and about their length are not affected by the capability of free-text retrieval
    Type
    a
  5. Kuhlen, R.: Volltextanalyse zum Zwecke des Abstracting (1983) 0.00
    0.0026005022 = product of:
      0.010402009 = sum of:
        0.010402009 = weight(_text_:a in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010402009 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Gerdel, W.: Anforderungen an Referier Regeln aus Benutzersicht (1983) 0.00
    0.0026005022 = product of:
      0.010402009 = sum of:
        0.010402009 = weight(_text_:a in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010402009 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Eimermacher, M.: Textverstehen im Projekt KIT : kognitive Verfahren zur Informationsextraktion und Zusammenfassung aus Texten (1983) 0.00
    0.0026005022 = product of:
      0.010402009 = sum of:
        0.010402009 = weight(_text_:a in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010402009 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983) 0.00
    0.0026005022 = product of:
      0.010402009 = sum of:
        0.010402009 = weight(_text_:a in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010402009 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a