-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.06
0.06385712 = product of:
0.12771425 = sum of:
0.12771425 = sum of:
0.056769572 = weight(_text_:science in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056769572 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.070944674 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070944674 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
- Source
- Journal of education for library and information science. 36(1995) no.2, S.170-173
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.03
0.033326045 = product of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024085289 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042566802 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.03
0.033326045 = product of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024085289 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042566802 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.4, S.217-225
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.03
0.027771706 = product of:
0.05554341 = sum of:
0.05554341 = sum of:
0.020071074 = weight(_text_:science in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020071074 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.035472337 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035472337 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997)
0.02
0.017952116 = product of:
0.035904232 = sum of:
0.035904232 = product of:
0.071808465 = sum of:
0.071808465 = weight(_text_:science in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071808465 = score(doc=2749,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.52061355 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Structured abstracts have now become widespread in medical research journals. Considers whether or not such structured abstracts can be used effectively in social science journals. Reviews a a selection of studies to see if structured abstracts written for social science journals are more informative, easier to read and easier to search than their traditional equivalents. Results suggest that structured abstracts are appropriate for social science journals. Editors of social science journals should consider adopting structured abstracts
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998)
0.02
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = product of:
0.06422744 = sum of:
0.06422744 = weight(_text_:science in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06422744 = score(doc=2999,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to consider whether or not structured abstracts can be used efectively in non medical science periodicals. Reviews a selection of studies on structured abstracts from the medical and psychological literature, presents examples of structured abstracts published in non medical science periodicals and considers how original abstracts might be written in a structured form for these periodicals. Concludes that, in light of these example studies, editors of these periodicals should consider the value of adopting structured abstracts
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.359-364
-
Fraenkel, A.S.; Klein, S.T.: Information retrieval from annotated texts (1999)
0.01
0.014049753 = product of:
0.028099505 = sum of:
0.028099505 = product of:
0.05619901 = sum of:
0.05619901 = weight(_text_:science in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05619901 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.845-854
-
Sen, B.K.: Research articles in LISA Plus : problems of identification (1997)
0.01
0.009934675 = product of:
0.01986935 = sum of:
0.01986935 = product of:
0.0397387 = sum of:
0.0397387 = weight(_text_:science in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0397387 = score(doc=430,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to determine how easy and quickly research articles in library and information science could be retrieved from the LISA Plus CD-ROM database. Results show that the search with the descriptor 'research' retrieves all types of articles and it is necessary to read through every abstract to locate the research articles. The introductory sentence of a substantial number of abstracts hinder the process of identification since the sentence provides such information as the conference where the paper was presented, the special issue or the section of a periodical where the article is located; or obvious background information. Suggests measures whereby research articles can be identified easily and rapidly
- Source
- Malaysian journal of library and information science. 2(1997) no.1, S.97-106
-
Spiteri, L.F.: Library and information science vs business : a comparison of approaches to abstracting (1997)
0.01
0.009934675 = product of:
0.01986935 = sum of:
0.01986935 = product of:
0.0397387 = sum of:
0.0397387 = weight(_text_:science in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0397387 = score(doc=3699,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The library and information science (LIS) literature on abstracting makes little mention about abstracting conducted in the corporate / business environment, whereas the business literature suggests that abstarcting is a very important component of business writing. Examines a variety of publications from LIS and business in order to compare and contrast their approaches to the following aspects of abstracting: definitions of abstracts; types of abstracts; purpose of abstracts; and writing of abstracts. Summarises the results of the examination which revealed a number of similarities, differences, and inadequacies in the ways in which both fields approach abstracting. Concludes that both fields need to develop more detailed guidelines concerning the cognitive process of abstracting and suggests improvements to the training af absractors based on these findings
-
Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992)
0.01
0.00802843 = product of:
0.01605686 = sum of:
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03211372 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 14(1992) no.1, S.31-56
-
Molina, M.P.: Documentary abstracting : toward a methodological approach (1995)
0.01
0.00802843 = product of:
0.01605686 = sum of:
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 1790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03211372 = score(doc=1790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1790)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.3, S.225-234
-
Monday, I.: ¬Les processus cognitifs et la redaction de résumes (1996)
0.01
0.00802843 = product of:
0.01605686 = sum of:
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 6917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03211372 = score(doc=6917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 6917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Attempts to explain the intellectual and cognitive processes which govern the understanding and structure of a text, on the one hand, and writing a summary or abstract on the other, based on the literature of information science, education, cognitive psychology and psychiatry
-
Booth, A.; O'Rouke, A.J.: ¬The value of structured abstracts in information retrieval from MEDLINE (1997)
0.01
0.00802843 = product of:
0.01605686 = sum of:
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03211372 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a structured abstract of the actual article. Outlines the debate on the value of structured abstracts and describes a research project into their use, which investigated records of cardiovascular disease downloaded from MEDLINE and tested against clinical questions derived from a survey of CD-ROM use in 3 health science libraries. It was found that structured abstracts improve precision at the expense of recall and place heavier demands on the skills of selecting fields to search within the abstract. Indicates directions for further research
