-
Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997)
0.02
0.024532227 = product of:
0.19625781 = sum of:
0.09812891 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09812891 = score(doc=701,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6877445 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.09812891 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09812891 = score(doc=701,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6877445 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
-
Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995)
0.00
0.0036108557 = product of:
0.05777369 = sum of:
0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05777369 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Compares formats and linguistic devices of German abstracts and their English equivalents, written by German medical scholars to English native speakers. The source is 20 abstracts taken from German medical journals representing different degrees of specialism. The analysis includes: the overall length of articles/abstracts; the representation/arrangement of sections; the linguistic devices. Results show no correlation between the length of articles and the length of abstracts. In contrast to native speaking author abstracts, 'background information' predominated in the structure of the studied German non-native speaker abstracts, whereas 'purpose of study' and 'conclusions' were not clearly stated. In linguistic terms, the German abstracts frequently contained lexical hegdes, complex and enumerating sentence structure; passive voice and post tense as well as various types of linking structures
-
O'Rourke, A.J.: Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases : a literature survey (1997)
0.00
0.0036108557 = product of:
0.05777369 = sum of:
0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05777369 = score(doc=85,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Clear guidelines have been provided for structuring the abstracts of original research and review articles and, in the past 10 years, several major medical periodicals have adopted the policy of including such abstracts with all their articles. A review of the literature reveals that proponents claim that structured abstracts enhance peer review, improve information retrieval, and ease critical appraisal. However, some periodicals have not adopted structured abstracts and their opponents claim that they make articles longer and harder to read and restrict author originality. Concludes that previous research on structured abstracts focused on how closely they followed prescribed structure and include salient points of the full text, rather than their role in increasing the usefulness of the article
-
Fraenkel, A.S.; Klein, S.T.: Information retrieval from annotated texts (1999)
0.00
0.003606071 = product of:
0.057697136 = sum of:
0.057697136 = weight(_text_:american in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057697136 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5273583 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.845-854
-
Tenopir, C.; Jascó, P.: Quality of abstracts (1993)
0.00
0.002060612 = product of:
0.03296979 = sum of:
0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 5026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03296979 = score(doc=5026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 5026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5026)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Abstracts enable users to judge the relevance of articles, provide a summary and may be a substitute for the original document. Defines abstracts and considers who they are written be according to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and other sources. Distinguishes between indicative and informative abstracts. Informative abstracts are preferred by ANSI and ERIC. Discusses the content and procedures for abstracting, writing style, tests of quality and readability and informativeness. Presents statistics analyzing abstracts from 3 general interest databases and on abstract length and type
-
Molina, M.P.: Documentary abstracting : toward a methodological approach (1995)
0.00
0.002060612 = product of:
0.03296979 = sum of:
0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 1790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03296979 = score(doc=1790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 1790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1790)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.3, S.225-234
-
Armstrong, C.J.; Wheatley, A.: Writing abstracts for online databases : results of database producers' guidelines (1998)
0.00
0.001934564 = product of:
0.030953024 = sum of:
0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030953024 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 11:03:13
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.00
0.0013586915 = product of:
0.021739064 = sum of:
0.021739064 = product of:
0.043478128 = sum of:
0.043478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043478128 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993)
0.00
0.0011208346 = product of:
0.017933354 = sum of:
0.017933354 = product of:
0.035866708 = sum of:
0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035866708 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- British librarianship and information work 1986-1990. Ed. by D. Bromley and A.M. Allott
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.00
8.152149E-4 = product of:
0.013043438 = sum of:
0.013043438 = product of:
0.026086876 = sum of:
0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026086876 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.00
8.152149E-4 = product of:
0.013043438 = sum of:
0.013043438 = product of:
0.026086876 = sum of:
0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026086876 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.00
6.7934574E-4 = product of:
0.010869532 = sum of:
0.010869532 = product of:
0.021739064 = sum of:
0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021739064 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
