Search (68 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Reischer, J.; Lottes, D.; Meier, F.; Stirner, M.: Evaluation von Summarizing-Systemen : Kommerzielle und freie Systeme im Vergleich (2010) 0.01 
    0.00849965 = product of:
  0.0169993 = sum of:
    0.0169993 = product of:
      0.02549895 = sum of:
        0.0207044 = weight(_text_:d in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0207044 = score(doc=492,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.237484 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Pages
    S.298-308
  2. Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993) 0.01 
    0.0064782575 = product of:
  0.012956515 = sum of:
    0.012956515 = product of:
      0.019434772 = sum of:
        0.014640221 = weight(_text_:d in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014640221 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.212-225
    Source
    British librarianship and information work 1986-1990. Ed. by D. Bromley and A.M. Allott
  3. Neumann-Duscha, I.: Über die Qualität von Referaten (1990) 0.01 
    0.0064782575 = product of:
  0.012956515 = sum of:
    0.012956515 = product of:
      0.019434772 = sum of:
        0.014640221 = weight(_text_:d in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014640221 = score(doc=8593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=8593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaus. 1990, H.46, S.53-70
  4. Scholz, M.: Qualitätssicherung von Datenbanken : eine gemeinsame Aufgabe von Autor, Schriftleitung und Dokumentar (1994) 0.01 
    0.0064782575 = product of:
  0.012956515 = sum of:
    0.012956515 = product of:
      0.019434772 = sum of:
        0.014640221 = weight(_text_:d in 8971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014640221 = score(doc=8971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 8971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8971)
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 8971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=8971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 8971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8971)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1994, H.50, S.24-27d
  5. Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995) 0.01 
    0.0064782575 = product of:
  0.012956515 = sum of:
    0.012956515 = product of:
      0.019434772 = sum of:
        0.014640221 = weight(_text_:d in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014640221 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Source
    Indexer. 19(1995) no.4, S.243-247
  6. Ruda, S.: Abstracting: eine Auswahlbibliographie (1992) 0.01 
    0.0062477156 = product of:
  0.012495431 = sum of:
    0.012495431 = product of:
      0.018743146 = sum of:
        0.012810193 = weight(_text_:d in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012810193 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
        0.005932954 = weight(_text_:s in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005932954 = score(doc=6603,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 43(1992) H.5, S.283-292
  7. Spina, D.; Trippas, J.R.; Cavedon, L.; Sanderson, M.: Extracting audio summaries to support effective spoken document search (2017) 0.00 
    0.004858693 = product of:
  0.009717386 = sum of:
    0.009717386 = product of:
      0.014576078 = sum of:
        0.010980166 = weight(_text_:d in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010980166 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
        0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035959128 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2101-2115
  8. Hahn, U.: Abstracting - Textzusammenfassung (2023) 0.00 
    0.004858693 = product of:
  0.009717386 = sum of:
    0.009717386 = product of:
      0.014576078 = sum of:
        0.010980166 = weight(_text_:d in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010980166 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
        0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035959128 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Pages
    S.233-244
  9. Kuhlen, R.: Informationsaufbereitung III : Referieren (Abstracts - Abstracting - Grundlagen) (2004) 0.00 
    0.00458082 = product of:
  0.00916164 = sum of:
    0.00916164 = product of:
      0.013742459 = sum of:
        0.0103522 = weight(_text_:d in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0103522 = score(doc=2917,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.118742 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
        0.0033902593 = weight(_text_:s in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033902593 = score(doc=2917,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Was ein Abstract (im Folgenden synonym mit Referat oder Kurzreferat gebraucht) ist, legt das American National Standards Institute in einer Weise fest, die sicherlich von den meisten Fachleuten akzeptiert werden kann: "An abstract is defined as an abbreviated, accurate representation of the contents of a document"; fast genauso die deutsche Norm DIN 1426: "Das Kurzreferat gibt kurz und klar den Inhalt des Dokuments wieder." Abstracts gehören zum wissenschaftlichen Alltag. Weitgehend allen Publikationen, zumindest in den naturwissenschaftlichen, technischen, informationsbezogenen oder medizinischen Bereichen, gehen Abstracts voran, "prefe-rably prepared by its author(s) for publication with it". Es gibt wohl keinen Wissenschaftler, der nicht irgendwann einmal ein Abstract geschrieben hätte. Gehört das Erstellen von Abstracts dann überhaupt zur dokumentarischen bzw informationswissenschaftlichen Methodenlehre, wenn es jeder kann? Was macht den informationellen Mehrwert aus, der durch Expertenreferate gegenüber Laienreferaten erzeugt wird? Dies ist nicht so leicht zu beantworten, zumal geeignete Bewertungsverfahren fehlen, die Qualität von Abstracts vergleichend "objektiv" zu messen. Abstracts werden in erheblichem Umfang von Informationsspezialisten erstellt, oft unter der Annahme, dass Autoren selber dafür weniger geeignet sind. Vergegenwärtigen wir uns, was wir über Abstracts und Abstracting wissen. Ein besonders gelungenes Abstract ist zuweilen klarer als der Ursprungstext selber, darf aber nicht mehr Information als dieser enthalten: "Good abstracts are highly structured, concise, and coherent, and are the result of a thorough analysis of the content of the abstracted materials. Abstracts may be more readable than the basis documents, but because of size constraints they rarely equal and never surpass the information content of the basic document". Dies ist verständlich, denn ein "Abstract" ist zunächst nichts anderes als ein Ergebnis des Vorgangs einer Abstraktion. Ohne uns zu sehr in die philosophischen Hintergründe der Abstraktion zu verlieren, besteht diese doch "in der Vernachlässigung von bestimmten Vorstellungsbzw. Begriffsinhalten, von welchen zugunsten anderer Teilinhalte abgesehen, abstrahiert' wird. Sie ist stets verbunden mit einer Fixierung von (interessierenden) Merkmalen durch die aktive Aufmerksamkeit, die unter einem bestimmten pragmatischen Gesichtspunkt als wesentlich' für einen vorgestellten bzw für einen unter einen Begriff fallenden Gegenstand (oder eine Mehrheit von Gegenständen) betrachtet werden". Abstracts reduzieren weniger Begriffsinhalte, sondern Texte bezüglich ihres proportionalen Gehaltes. Borko/ Bernier haben dies sogar quantifiziert; sie schätzen den Reduktionsfaktor auf 1:10 bis 1:12
    Language
    d
    Pages
    S.189-206
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  10. Brintzinger, K.-R.: Abstracts im Verbund : Von der bibliothekarischen zur nutzerorientierten Erschließung. ein Versuch des Juristischen Seminars der Universität Tübingen (2003) 0.00 
    0.004249825 = product of:
  0.00849965 = sum of:
    0.00849965 = product of:
      0.012749475 = sum of:
        0.0103522 = weight(_text_:d in 1548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0103522 = score(doc=1548,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.118742 = fieldWeight in 1548, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1548)
        0.0023972753 = weight(_text_:s in 1548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023972753 = score(doc=1548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 1548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1548)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Pages
    S.11-14
  11. Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987) 0.00 
    0.0015981835 = product of:
  0.003196367 = sum of:
    0.003196367 = product of:
      0.009589101 = sum of:
        0.009589101 = weight(_text_:s in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009589101 = score(doc=2738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S. - .
  12. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989) 0.00 
    0.0014126081 = product of:
  0.0028252162 = sum of:
    0.0028252162 = product of:
      0.008475648 = sum of:
        0.008475648 = weight(_text_:s in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008475648 = score(doc=3549,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.103-112
    Source
    Information, knowledge, evolution. Proceedings of the 44th FID Congress, Helsinki, 28.8.-1.9.1988. Ed. by S. Koshiala and R. Launo
  13. Fraenkel, A.S.; Klein, S.T.: Information retrieval from annotated texts (1999) 0.00 
    0.0013984106 = product of:
  0.0027968213 = sum of:
    0.0027968213 = product of:
      0.008390464 = sum of:
        0.008390464 = weight(_text_:s in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008390464 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.845-854
  14. Pinto, M.; Lancaster, F.W.: Abstracts and abstracting in knowledge discovery (1999) 0.00 
    0.0013984106 = product of:
  0.0027968213 = sum of:
    0.0027968213 = product of:
      0.008390464 = sum of:
        0.008390464 = weight(_text_:s in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008390464 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.234-248
  15. Hartley, J.: Do structured abstracts take more space? : And does it matter? (2002) 0.00 
    0.0013984106 = product of:
  0.0027968213 = sum of:
    0.0027968213 = product of:
      0.008390464 = sum of:
        0.008390464 = weight(_text_:s in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008390464 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.5, S.417-422
  16. Borko, H.; Chatman, S.: Criteria for acceptable abstracts : a survey of abstractors' instructions (1963) 0.00 
    9.888257E-4 = product of:
  0.0019776514 = sum of:
    0.0019776514 = product of:
      0.005932954 = sum of:
        0.005932954 = weight(_text_:s in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005932954 = score(doc=687,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    American documentation. 14(1963), S.149-160
  17. Fidel, R.: Writing abstracts for free-text searching (1986) 0.00 
    7.9909177E-4 = product of:
  0.0015981835 = sum of:
    0.0015981835 = product of:
      0.0047945506 = sum of:
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 42(1986), S.11-21
  18. Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992) 0.00 
    7.9909177E-4 = product of:
  0.0015981835 = sum of:
    0.0015981835 = product of:
      0.0047945506 = sum of:
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library and information science research. 14(1992) no.1, S.31-56
  19. Tenopir, C.; Jascó, P.: Quality of abstracts (1993) 0.00 
    7.9909177E-4 = product of:
  0.0015981835 = sum of:
    0.0015981835 = product of:
      0.0047945506 = sum of:
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 5026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=5026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5026)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online. 17(1993) no.3, S.44-55
  20. Molina, M.P.: Documentary abstracting : toward a methodological approach (1995) 0.00 
    7.9909177E-4 = product of:
  0.0015981835 = sum of:
    0.0015981835 = product of:
      0.0047945506 = sum of:
        0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 1790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047945506 = score(doc=1790,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045888513 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1790, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1790)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.3, S.225-234

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 22
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Themes