Search (68 results, page 3 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Sauperl, A.; Klasinc, J.; Luzar, S.: Components of abstracts : logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature (2008) 0.00 
    0.0010635054 = product of:
  0.0021270108 = sum of:
    0.0021270108 = product of:
      0.0042540217 = sum of:
        0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042540217 = score(doc=1961,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1420-1432
  2. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674
  3. Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.769-776
  4. Rothkegel, A.: Abstracting from the perspective of text production (1995) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.777-784
  5. O'Rourke, A.J.: Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases : a literature survey (1997) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=85,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Health informatics journal. 3(1997) no.1, S.17-20
  6. Sen, B.K.: Research articles in LISA Plus : problems of identification (1997) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Malaysian journal of library and information science. 2(1997) no.1, S.97-106
  7. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 1(1997) no.2, S.15-39
  8. Armstrong, C.J.; Wheatley, A.: Writing abstracts for online databases : results of database producers' guidelines (1998) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Program. 32(1998) no.4, S.359-371
  9. Spiteri, L.F.: Library and information science vs business : a comparison of approaches to abstracting (1997) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=3699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1997) no.4, S.197-200
  10. Bowman, J.H.: Annotation: a lost art in cataloguing (2007) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.1/2, S.95-111
  11. Koltay, T.: Abstracting: information literacy on a professional level (2009) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 3610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=3610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.841-855
  12. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarising text for intelligent communication : results of the Dagstuhl seminar (1994) 0.00 
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 8867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=8867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 8867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 21(1994) no.4, S.213-223
  13. Wheatley, A.; Armstrong, C.J.: Metadata, recall, and abstracts : can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value? (1997) 0.00 
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 49(1997) no.8, S.206-213
  14. Pinto, M.: Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments : research trends (2003) 0.00 
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.5, S.581-608
  15. Montesi, M.; Urdiciain, B.G.: Recent linguistic research into author abstracts : its value for information science (2005) 0.00 
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=4823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 32(2005) no.2, S.64-78
  16. Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences (2009) 0.00 
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.10, S.2010-2018
  17. Spina, D.; Trippas, J.R.; Cavedon, L.; Sanderson, M.: Extracting audio summaries to support effective spoken document search (2017) 0.00 
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2101-2115
  18. Hahn, U.: Abstracting - Textzusammenfassung (2023) 0.00 
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.233-244
  19. Ou, S.; Khoo, C.; Goh, D.H.; Heng, H.-Y.: Automatic discourse parsing of sociology dissertation abstracts as sentence categorization (2004) 0.00 
    8.508044E-4 = product of:
  0.0017016088 = sum of:
    0.0017016088 = product of:
      0.0034032175 = sum of:
        0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 2676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034032175 = score(doc=2676,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 2676, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2676)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.345-350
  20. Kuhlen, R.: Informationsaufbereitung III : Referieren (Abstracts - Abstracting - Grundlagen) (2004) 0.00 
    8.508044E-4 = product of:
  0.0017016088 = sum of:
    0.0017016088 = product of:
      0.0034032175 = sum of:
        0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034032175 = score(doc=2917,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Was ein Abstract (im Folgenden synonym mit Referat oder Kurzreferat gebraucht) ist, legt das American National Standards Institute in einer Weise fest, die sicherlich von den meisten Fachleuten akzeptiert werden kann: "An abstract is defined as an abbreviated, accurate representation of the contents of a document"; fast genauso die deutsche Norm DIN 1426: "Das Kurzreferat gibt kurz und klar den Inhalt des Dokuments wieder." Abstracts gehören zum wissenschaftlichen Alltag. Weitgehend allen Publikationen, zumindest in den naturwissenschaftlichen, technischen, informationsbezogenen oder medizinischen Bereichen, gehen Abstracts voran, "prefe-rably prepared by its author(s) for publication with it". Es gibt wohl keinen Wissenschaftler, der nicht irgendwann einmal ein Abstract geschrieben hätte. Gehört das Erstellen von Abstracts dann überhaupt zur dokumentarischen bzw informationswissenschaftlichen Methodenlehre, wenn es jeder kann? Was macht den informationellen Mehrwert aus, der durch Expertenreferate gegenüber Laienreferaten erzeugt wird? Dies ist nicht so leicht zu beantworten, zumal geeignete Bewertungsverfahren fehlen, die Qualität von Abstracts vergleichend "objektiv" zu messen. Abstracts werden in erheblichem Umfang von Informationsspezialisten erstellt, oft unter der Annahme, dass Autoren selber dafür weniger geeignet sind. Vergegenwärtigen wir uns, was wir über Abstracts und Abstracting wissen. Ein besonders gelungenes Abstract ist zuweilen klarer als der Ursprungstext selber, darf aber nicht mehr Information als dieser enthalten: "Good abstracts are highly structured, concise, and coherent, and are the result of a thorough analysis of the content of the abstracted materials. Abstracts may be more readable than the basis documents, but because of size constraints they rarely equal and never surpass the information content of the basic document". Dies ist verständlich, denn ein "Abstract" ist zunächst nichts anderes als ein Ergebnis des Vorgangs einer Abstraktion. Ohne uns zu sehr in die philosophischen Hintergründe der Abstraktion zu verlieren, besteht diese doch "in der Vernachlässigung von bestimmten Vorstellungsbzw. Begriffsinhalten, von welchen zugunsten anderer Teilinhalte abgesehen, abstrahiert' wird. Sie ist stets verbunden mit einer Fixierung von (interessierenden) Merkmalen durch die aktive Aufmerksamkeit, die unter einem bestimmten pragmatischen Gesichtspunkt als wesentlich' für einen vorgestellten bzw für einen unter einen Begriff fallenden Gegenstand (oder eine Mehrheit von Gegenständen) betrachtet werden". Abstracts reduzieren weniger Begriffsinhalte, sondern Texte bezüglich ihres proportionalen Gehaltes. Borko/ Bernier haben dies sogar quantifiziert; sie schätzen den Reduktionsfaktor auf 1:10 bis 1:12
    Pages
    S.189-206

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 22
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Themes