Search (33 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarizing information (1998) 0.00 
    0.0019024262 = product of:
  0.013316983 = sum of:
    0.013316983 = weight(_text_:information in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013316983 = score(doc=688,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Summarizing is the process of reducing the large information size of something like a novel or a scientific paper to a short summary or abstract comprising only the most essential points. Summarizing is frequent in everyday communication, but it is also a professional skill for journalists and others. Automated summarizing functions are urgently needed by Internet users who wish to avoid being overwhelmed by information. This book presents the state of the art and surveys related research; it deals with everyday and professional summarizing as well as computerized approaches. The author focuses in detail on the cognitive pro-cess involved in summarizing and supports this with a multimedia simulation systems on the accompanying CD-ROM
  2. Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995) 0.00 
    0.0018122118 = product of:
  0.012685482 = sum of:
    0.012685482 = weight(_text_:information in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012685482 = score(doc=3677,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Compares formats and linguistic devices of German abstracts and their English equivalents, written by German medical scholars to English native speakers. The source is 20 abstracts taken from German medical journals representing different degrees of specialism. The analysis includes: the overall length of articles/abstracts; the representation/arrangement of sections; the linguistic devices. Results show no correlation between the length of articles and the length of abstracts. In contrast to native speaking author abstracts, 'background information' predominated in the structure of the studied German non-native speaker abstracts, whereas 'purpose of study' and 'conclusions' were not clearly stated. In linguistic terms, the German abstracts frequently contained lexical hegdes, complex and enumerating sentence structure; passive voice and post tense as well as various types of linking structures
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.769-776
  3. Spiteri, L.F.: Library and information science vs business : a comparison of approaches to abstracting (1997) 0.00 
    0.0018122118 = product of:
  0.012685482 = sum of:
    0.012685482 = weight(_text_:information in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012685482 = score(doc=3699,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The library and information science (LIS) literature on abstracting makes little mention about abstracting conducted in the corporate / business environment, whereas the business literature suggests that abstarcting is a very important component of business writing. Examines a variety of publications from LIS and business in order to compare and contrast their approaches to the following aspects of abstracting: definitions of abstracts; types of abstracts; purpose of abstracts; and writing of abstracts. Summarises the results of the examination which revealed a number of similarities, differences, and inadequacies in the ways in which both fields approach abstracting. Concludes that both fields need to develop more detailed guidelines concerning the cognitive process of abstracting and suggests improvements to the training af absractors based on these findings
  4. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarising text for intelligent communication : results of the Dagstuhl seminar (1994) 0.00 
    0.0015533245 = product of:
  0.010873271 = sum of:
    0.010873271 = weight(_text_:information in 8867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010873271 = score(doc=8867,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 8867, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8867)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    As a result of the transition to full-text storage, multimedia and networking, information systems are becoming more efficient but at the same time more difficult to use, in particular because users are confronted with information volumes that increasingly exceed individual processing capacities. Consequently, there is an increase in the demand for user aids such as summarising techniques. Against this background, the interdisciplinary Dagstuhl Seminar 'Summarising Text for Intelligent Communication' (Dec. 1993) outlined the academic state of the art with regard to summarising (abstracting) and proposed future directions for research and system development. Research is currently shifting its attention from text summarising to summarising states of affairs. Recycling solutions are put forward in order to satisfy short-term needs for summarisation products. In the medium and long term, it is necessary to devise concepts and methods of intelligent summarising which have a better formal and empirical grounding and a more modular organisation
  5. Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993) 0.00 
    0.0014644885 = product of:
  0.010251419 = sum of:
    0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010251419 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    British librarianship and information work 1986-1990. Ed. by D. Bromley and A.M. Allott
  6. Molina, M.P.: Documentary abstracting : toward a methodological approach (1995) 0.00 
    0.0014644885 = product of:
  0.010251419 = sum of:
    0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 1790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010251419 = score(doc=1790,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1790, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1790)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.3, S.225-234
  7. Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995) 0.00 
    0.0014644885 = product of:
  0.010251419 = sum of:
    0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010251419 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
  8. Monday, I.: ¬Les processus cognitifs et la redaction de résumes (1996) 0.00 
    0.0014644885 = product of:
  0.010251419 = sum of:
    0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 6917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010251419 = score(doc=6917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6917)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Attempts to explain the intellectual and cognitive processes which govern the understanding and structure of a text, on the one hand, and writing a summary or abstract on the other, based on the literature of information science, education, cognitive psychology and psychiatry
  9. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998) 0.00 
    0.0014644885 = product of:
  0.010251419 = sum of:
    0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010251419 = score(doc=2999,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.359-364
  10. Cleveland, D.B.; Cleveland, A.D.: Introduction to abstracting and indexing (1990) 0.00 
    0.0014644885 = product of:
  0.010251419 = sum of:
    0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010251419 = score(doc=317,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of the American Society for information Science. 42(1991) S.532-539 (B.H. Weinberg)
  11. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995) 0.00 
    0.0012814275 = product of:
  0.0089699915 = sum of:
    0.0089699915 = weight(_text_:information in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0089699915 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674
  12. Rothkegel, A.: Abstracting from the perspective of text production (1995) 0.00 
    0.0012814275 = product of:
  0.0089699915 = sum of:
    0.0089699915 = weight(_text_:information in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0089699915 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.777-784
  13. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.00 
    0.0010983663 = product of:
  0.007688564 = sum of:
    0.007688564 = weight(_text_:information in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007688564 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.8, S.728-730 (J.-E. Mai); Indexer 21(1999) no.3, S.148 (P.F. Booth); Managing information 6(1999) no.1, S.48 (S.T. Clarke); Electronic library 17(1999) no.3, S.193 (F. Parry)

Authors

Languages

  • e 28
  • d 4
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 25
  • m 6
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications