Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Spiteri, L.F.: Library and information science vs business : a comparison of approaches to abstracting (1997) 0.04 
    0.042791158 = product of:
  0.17116463 = sum of:
    0.17116463 = weight(_text_:fields in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17116463 = score(doc=3699,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.5415868 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The library and information science (LIS) literature on abstracting makes little mention about abstracting conducted in the corporate / business environment, whereas the business literature suggests that abstarcting is a very important component of business writing. Examines a variety of publications from LIS and business in order to compare and contrast their approaches to the following aspects of abstracting: definitions of abstracts; types of abstracts; purpose of abstracts; and writing of abstracts. Summarises the results of the examination which revealed a number of similarities, differences, and inadequacies in the ways in which both fields approach abstracting. Concludes that both fields need to develop more detailed guidelines concerning the cognitive process of abstracting and suggests improvements to the training af absractors based on these findings
  2. Booth, A.; O'Rouke, A.J.: ¬The value of structured abstracts in information retrieval from MEDLINE (1997) 0.03 
    0.03458048 = product of:
  0.13832192 = sum of:
    0.13832192 = weight(_text_:fields in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13832192 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.43766826 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a structured abstract of the actual article. Outlines the debate on the value of structured abstracts and describes a research project into their use, which investigated records of cardiovascular disease downloaded from MEDLINE and tested against clinical questions derived from a survey of CD-ROM use in 3 health science libraries. It was found that structured abstracts improve precision at the expense of recall and place heavier demands on the skills of selecting fields to search within the abstract. Indicates directions for further research
  3. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.02 
    0.02161877 = product of:
  0.08647508 = sum of:
    0.08647508 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08647508 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  4. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.01 
    0.0129712615 = product of:
  0.051885046 = sum of:
    0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051885046 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  5. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.01 
    0.0129712615 = product of:
  0.051885046 = sum of:
    0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051885046 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  6. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.01 
    0.010809385 = product of:
  0.04323754 = sum of:
    0.04323754 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04323754 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356

Authors

Themes