Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.05
    0.052867796 = product of:
      0.15860339 = sum of:
        0.15860339 = sum of:
          0.11821385 = weight(_text_:indexing in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11821385 = score(doc=7244,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.6215682 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04038954 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  2. Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993) 0.03
    0.033914097 = product of:
      0.10174229 = sum of:
        0.10174229 = product of:
          0.20348458 = sum of:
            0.20348458 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20348458 = score(doc=5540,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                1.0699216 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of UK developments in indexing and abstracting druing the period 1986-1990 covering: bibliographies of indexing and abstracting; British standards (including the revised British Standard on indexing, BS 3700); Wheatley Medal and Carey Award; a list of indexes published during this period; the role of the computer and automatic indexing; hypermedia; PRECIS; POPSI, relational indexing; thesauri; education and training; the indexing process, newspaper indexing; fiction indexes; the indexing profession; and a review of abstracting and indexing services
  3. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.03
    0.033163927 = product of:
      0.09949178 = sum of:
        0.09949178 = product of:
          0.19898356 = sum of:
            0.19898356 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19898356 = score(doc=4141,freq=34.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                1.0462552 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                    34.0 = termFreq=34.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Indexing principles, Indexing practice, Precoordinate indexes, Consistency of indexing, Quality of indexing, Abstracts: types and functions, Writing the Abstract, Evaluation aspects, Approaches used in indexing and abstracting services, Enhancing the indexing, On the indexing and abstracting of imaginative works, Indexing multimedia sources, Texte searching, Automatic indexing, automatic abstracting, and related procedures, Indexing and the Internet, The future of indexing and abstracting, exercises in indexing and abstracting
    LCSH
    Indexing
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Subject
    Indexing
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
  4. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991) 0.03
    0.028152019 = product of:
      0.08445606 = sum of:
        0.08445606 = product of:
          0.16891211 = sum of:
            0.16891211 = weight(_text_:indexing in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16891211 = score(doc=752,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.8881396 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    COMPASS
    Indexing
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: Pre-coordinate indexes; consistency of indexing: quality of indexing; abstracts: types and functions, writing the abstract, natural language in information retrieval, automatic indexing. There are exercises in both indexing and abstracting procedures
    LCSH
    Indexing
    Subject
    Indexing
    Indexing
  5. Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995) 0.02
    0.02398089 = product of:
      0.071942665 = sum of:
        0.071942665 = product of:
          0.14388533 = sum of:
            0.14388533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14388533 = score(doc=2926,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.7565488 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
  6. Cleveland, D.B.; Cleveland, A.D.: Introduction to abstracting and indexing (1990) 0.02
    0.02398089 = product of:
      0.071942665 = sum of:
        0.071942665 = product of:
          0.14388533 = sum of:
            0.14388533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14388533 = score(doc=317,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.7565488 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    LCSH
    Indexing
    RSWK
    Indexing / Abstracting (GBV)
    Subject
    Indexing / Abstracting (GBV)
    Indexing
  7. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.01
    0.011219318 = product of:
      0.033657953 = sum of:
        0.033657953 = product of:
          0.06731591 = sum of:
            0.06731591 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06731591 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  8. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.01
    0.0067315903 = product of:
      0.02019477 = sum of:
        0.02019477 = product of:
          0.04038954 = sum of:
            0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04038954 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  9. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.01
    0.005609659 = product of:
      0.016828977 = sum of:
        0.016828977 = product of:
          0.033657953 = sum of:
            0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033657953 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356