-
Ickler, T.: Zur Textgattung 'Abstract' (1993)
0.03
0.025284786 = product of:
0.05056957 = sum of:
0.05056957 = product of:
0.07585435 = sum of:
0.013443029 = weight(_text_:a in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013443029 = score(doc=5898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
0.062411327 = weight(_text_:h in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062411327 = score(doc=5898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.5489909 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Fachsprache. 15(1993) H.1/2, S.44-53
- Type
- a
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.02
0.02454598 = product of:
0.04909196 = sum of:
0.04909196 = product of:
0.07363794 = sum of:
0.011642005 = weight(_text_:a in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011642005 = score(doc=3061,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061995935 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses briefly the application of hypertext in library user training with particular reference to a specific hypertext based tutorial designed to teach library school students the basics knowledge of abstracts and abstracting process
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
- Type
- a
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.02
0.019636784 = product of:
0.039273567 = sum of:
0.039273567 = product of:
0.05891035 = sum of:
0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009313605 = score(doc=2832,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049596746 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reference librarians, who are thoroughly familiar with the purpose, scope and arrangement of abstract periodicals, are uniquely qualified for the task of writing abstracts. The procedures described here offer a relatively simple way for them to write acceptable abstracts from the outset. Although research is being conducted in the area of machine generated abstracts, there wll continue to be a role for human abstractors.
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
- Type
- a
-
Schott, H.; Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: ¬Ein individuelles prozedurales Modell des Abstracting (1992)
0.02
0.01769935 = product of:
0.0353987 = sum of:
0.0353987 = product of:
0.053098045 = sum of:
0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 8852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009410121 = score(doc=8852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 8852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8852)
0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 8852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043687925 = score(doc=8852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 8852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8852)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Kuhlen, R.: Volltextanalyse zum Zwecke des Abstracting (1983)
0.02
0.01769935 = product of:
0.0353987 = sum of:
0.0353987 = product of:
0.053098045 = sum of:
0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009410121 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043687925 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
- Type
- a
-
Gerdel, W.: Anforderungen an Referier Regeln aus Benutzersicht (1983)
0.02
0.01769935 = product of:
0.0353987 = sum of:
0.0353987 = product of:
0.053098045 = sum of:
0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009410121 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043687925 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
- Type
- a
-
Eimermacher, M.: Textverstehen im Projekt KIT : kognitive Verfahren zur Informationsextraktion und Zusammenfassung aus Texten (1983)
0.02
0.01769935 = product of:
0.0353987 = sum of:
0.0353987 = product of:
0.053098045 = sum of:
0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009410121 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043687925 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
- Type
- a
-
Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983)
0.02
0.01769935 = product of:
0.0353987 = sum of:
0.0353987 = product of:
0.053098045 = sum of:
0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009410121 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043687925 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
- Type
- a
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: ¬An empirical process model of abstracting (1992)
0.02
0.01628453 = product of:
0.03256906 = sum of:
0.03256906 = product of:
0.048853584 = sum of:
0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 8834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011406789 = score(doc=8834,freq=4.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 8834, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8834)
0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 8834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037446793 = score(doc=8834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 8834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8834)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
- Type
- a
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.02
0.015087794 = product of:
0.030175587 = sum of:
0.030175587 = product of:
0.04526338 = sum of:
0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008065818 = score(doc=4411,freq=8.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Structured abstracts are abstracts which include subheadings such as: background, aims, participants methods and results. These are rapidly replacing traditional abstracts in medical periodicals, but the number and detail of the subheadings used varies, and there is a range of different typographic settings. Reviews a number of studies designed to investigate readers' preferences for different typographic settings and layout. Over 400 readers took part in the study: students; postgraduates; research workers and academics in the social sciences. The most preferred version emerged from the last of 3 studies and 2 additional studies were then carried out to determine preferences for the overall position and layout of this most preferred version on a A4 page. The most preferred version for the setting of the subheadings are printed in bold capital letters
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
- Type
- a
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.01
0.014727588 = product of:
0.029455176 = sum of:
0.029455176 = product of:
0.044182763 = sum of:
0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006985203 = score(doc=7244,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Type
- a
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.01
0.014727588 = product of:
0.029455176 = sum of:
0.029455176 = product of:
0.044182763 = sum of:
0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006985203 = score(doc=2421,freq=6.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03719756 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Graph-based ranking algorithms have recently been proposed for single document summarizations and such algorithms evaluate the importance of a sentence by making use of the relationships between sentences in the document in a recursive way. In this paper, we investigate using other related or relevant documents to improve summarization of one single document based on the graph-based ranking algorithm. In addition to the within-document relationships between sentences in the specified document, the cross-document relationships between sentences in different documents are also taken into account in the proposed approach. We evaluate the performance of the proposed approach on DUC 2002 data with the ROUGE metric and results demonstrate that the cross-document relationships between sentences in different but related documents can significantly improve the performance of single document summarization.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
- Type
- a
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.01
0.012837617 = product of:
0.025675233 = sum of:
0.025675233 = product of:
0.03851285 = sum of:
0.007514882 = weight(_text_:a in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007514882 = score(doc=7673,freq=10.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997967 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of 2 studies to determine if structured abstracts offer any advantage to users in terms of whether they are easier to search. In study 1, using a specially prepared electronic database of abstracts in either their original format or the structured format, 52 users were asked to find the answers to 2 questions for each of 8 abstracts in traditional format followed by 2 questions for each of 8 abstracts set in the structured format. Time and error data were recorded automatically. In study 2, using a printed database, 56 users were asked to to find 5 abstracts that reprted a particular kind of study and then find 5 more references that reported another kind of study. In study 1 users performed significantly faster and made fewer errors with structured abstracts but there were some unexplainable practice effects. In study 2, the users again performed significantly faster and made fewer errors with structured abstracts. However, there were asymmetrical transfer effects: users who responded first to the structured abstracts responded more quickly to the following traditional abstracts than did those users who responded first to the traditional abstracts. Nevertheless, the overall findings support the hypothesis that it is easier for user to search structured abstracts than it is to search traditional abstracts
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
- Type
- a
-
Borko, H.; Chatman, S.: Criteria for acceptable abstracts : a survey of abstractors' instructions (1963)
0.01
0.011122987 = product of:
0.022245973 = sum of:
0.022245973 = product of:
0.03336896 = sum of:
0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011524997 = score(doc=687,freq=12.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021843962 = score(doc=687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The need for criteria by which to judge the adequacy of an abstract is felt most strongly when evaluating machine-produced abstracts. In order to develop a set of criteria, a survey was conducted of the instructions prepared by various scientific publications as a guide to their abstracters in the preparation of copy. One-hundred-and-thirty sets of instructions were analyzed and compared as to their function, content, and form. It was concluded that, while differences in subject matter do not necessarily require different kinds of abstracts, there are significant variations between the informative and the indicative abstract. A set of criteria for the writing of an acceptable abstract of science literature was derived. The adequacy of these criteria is still to be validated, and the athors' plans for fututre research in this area are specified
- Type
- a
-
Neumann-Duscha, I.: Über die Qualität von Referaten (1990)
0.01
0.010113914 = product of:
0.020227827 = sum of:
0.020227827 = product of:
0.03034174 = sum of:
0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053772116 = score(doc=8593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02496453 = score(doc=8593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaus. 1990, H.46, S.53-70
- Type
- a
-
Scholz, M.: Qualitätssicherung von Datenbanken : eine gemeinsame Aufgabe von Autor, Schriftleitung und Dokumentar (1994)
0.01
0.010113914 = product of:
0.020227827 = sum of:
0.020227827 = product of:
0.03034174 = sum of:
0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 8971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053772116 = score(doc=8971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 8971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8971)
0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 8971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02496453 = score(doc=8971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 8971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8971)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1994, H.50, S.24-27d
- Type
- a
-
Ruda, S.: Abstracting: eine Auswahlbibliographie (1992)
0.01
0.008849675 = product of:
0.01769935 = sum of:
0.01769935 = product of:
0.026549023 = sum of:
0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047050603 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021843962 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 43(1992) H.5, S.283-292
- Type
- a
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003)
0.01
0.007585435 = product of:
0.01517087 = sum of:
0.01517087 = product of:
0.022756305 = sum of:
0.004032909 = weight(_text_:a in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004032909 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018723397 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.1, S.144-145 (H. Saggion): "... This volume is a very valuable source of information for not only students and professionals in library and information science but also for individuals and institutions involved in knowledge management and organization activities. Because of its broad coverage of the information science topic, teachers will find the contents of this book useful for courses in the areas of information technology, digital as well as traditional libraries, and information science in general."
-
Ou, S.; Khoo, C.; Goh, D.H.; Heng, H.-Y.: Automatic discourse parsing of sociology dissertation abstracts as sentence categorization (2004)
0.01
0.0071331207 = product of:
0.014266241 = sum of:
0.014266241 = product of:
0.021399362 = sum of:
0.008917097 = weight(_text_:a in 2676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008917097 = score(doc=2676,freq=22.0), product of:
0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.16900843 = fieldWeight in 2676, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2676)
0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 2676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012482265 = score(doc=2676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2676)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We investigated an approach to automatic discourse parsing of sociology dissertation abstracts as a sentence categorization task. Decision tree induction was used for the automatic categorization. Three models were developed. Model 1 made use of word tokens found in the sentences. Model 2 made use of both word tokens and sentence position in the abstract. In addition to the attributes used in Model 2, Model 3 also considered information regarding the presence of indicator words in surrounding sentences. Model 3 obtained the highest accuracy rate of 74.5 % when applied to a test sample, compared to 71.6% for Model 2 and 60.8% for Model 1. The results indicated that information about sentence position can substantially increase the accuracy of categorization, and indicator words in earlier sentences (before the sentence being processed) also contribute to the categorization accuracy.
- Content
- 1. Introduction This paper reports our initial effort to develop an automatic method for parsing the discourse structure of sociology dissertation abstracts. This study is part of a broader study to develop a method for multi-document summarization. Accurate discourse parsing will make it easier to perform automatic multi-document summarization of dissertation abstracts. In a previous study, we determined that the macro-level structure of dissertation abstracts typically has five sections (Khoo et al., 2002). In this study, we treated discourse parsing as a text categorization problem - assigning each sentence in a dissertation abstract to one of the five predefined sections or categories. Decision tree induction, a machine-learning method, was applied to word tokens found in the abstracts to construct a decision tree model for the categorization purpose. Decision tree induction was selected primarily because decision tree models are easy to interpret and can be converted to rules that can be incorporated in other computer programs. A well-known decision-tree induction program, C5.0 (Quinlan, 1993), was used in this study.
- Type
- a
-
Borko, H.; Bernier, C.L.: Abstracting concepts and methods (1975)
0.00
0.0041607553 = product of:
0.008321511 = sum of:
0.008321511 = product of:
0.02496453 = sum of:
0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02496453 = score(doc=929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045758117 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=929)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
