-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.04
0.03898394 = product of:
0.07796788 = sum of:
0.07796788 = sum of:
0.042571977 = weight(_text_:5 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042571977 = score(doc=7673,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.27921307 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.03539591 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03539591 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of 2 studies to determine if structured abstracts offer any advantage to users in terms of whether they are easier to search. In study 1, using a specially prepared electronic database of abstracts in either their original format or the structured format, 52 users were asked to find the answers to 2 questions for each of 8 abstracts in traditional format followed by 2 questions for each of 8 abstracts set in the structured format. Time and error data were recorded automatically. In study 2, using a printed database, 56 users were asked to to find 5 abstracts that reprted a particular kind of study and then find 5 more references that reported another kind of study. In study 1 users performed significantly faster and made fewer errors with structured abstracts but there were some unexplainable practice effects. In study 2, the users again performed significantly faster and made fewer errors with structured abstracts. However, there were asymmetrical transfer effects: users who responded first to the structured abstracts responded more quickly to the following traditional abstracts than did those users who responded first to the traditional abstracts. Nevertheless, the overall findings support the hypothesis that it is easier for user to search structured abstracts than it is to search traditional abstracts
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Summarizing text : [Themenheft] (1995)
0.02
0.019663153 = product of:
0.039326306 = sum of:
0.039326306 = product of:
0.07865261 = sum of:
0.07865261 = weight(_text_:5 in 3872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07865261 = score(doc=3872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.515852 = fieldWeight in 3872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-784
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.02
0.017697955 = product of:
0.03539591 = sum of:
0.03539591 = product of:
0.07079182 = sum of:
0.07079182 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07079182 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Heinrich, G.: ¬Die "Allzweck-Annotation" und der annotierte Katalogzetteldienst : offene Fragen und mögliche Alternativen (1971)
0.02
0.017205259 = product of:
0.034410518 = sum of:
0.034410518 = product of:
0.068821035 = sum of:
0.068821035 = weight(_text_:5 in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068821035 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.45137048 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 10:32:28
-
Hartley, J.: Do structured abstracts take more space? : And does it matter? (2002)
0.02
0.017205259 = product of:
0.034410518 = sum of:
0.034410518 = product of:
0.068821035 = sum of:
0.068821035 = weight(_text_:5 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068821035 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.45137048 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.5, S.417-422
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: ¬An empirical process model of abstracting (1992)
0.01
0.014747365 = product of:
0.02949473 = sum of:
0.02949473 = product of:
0.05898946 = sum of:
0.05898946 = weight(_text_:5 in 8834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05898946 = score(doc=8834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.38688898 = fieldWeight in 8834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.01
0.0141583625 = product of:
0.028316725 = sum of:
0.028316725 = product of:
0.05663345 = sum of:
0.05663345 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05663345 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998)
0.01
0.013903949 = product of:
0.027807899 = sum of:
0.027807899 = product of:
0.055615798 = sum of:
0.055615798 = weight(_text_:5 in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055615798 = score(doc=2999,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.36476243 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 4.1996 20:01:47
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.359-364
-
Ruda, S.: Abstracting: eine Auswahlbibliographie (1992)
0.01
0.012165956 = product of:
0.024331912 = sum of:
0.024331912 = product of:
0.048663825 = sum of:
0.048663825 = weight(_text_:5 in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048663825 = score(doc=6603,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.31916714 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die vorliegende Auswahlbibliographie ist in 9 Themenbereiche unterteilt. Der erste Abschnitt enthält Literatur, in der auf Abstracts und Abstracting-Verfahren allgemein eingegangen und ein Überblick über den Stand der Forschung gegeben wird. Im nächsten Abschnitt werden solche Aufsätze referiert, die die historische Entwicklung des Abstracting beschreiben. Im dritten Teil sind Abstracting-Richtlinien verschiedener Institutionen aufgelistet. Lexikalische, syntaktische und semantische Textkondensierungsverfahren sind das Thema der in Abschnitt 4 präsentierten Arbeiten. Textstrukturen von Abstracts werden unter Punkt 5 betrachtet, und die Arbeiten des nächsten Themenbereiches befassen sich mit dem Problem des Schreibens von Abstracts. Der siebte Abschnitt listet sog. 'maschinelle' und maschinen-unterstützte Abstracting-Methoden auf. Anschließend werden 'maschinelle' und maschinenunterstützte Abstracting-Verfahren, Abstracts im Vergleich zu ihren Primärtexten sowie Abstracts im allgemeien bewertet. Den Abschluß bilden Bibliographien
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 43(1992) H.5, S.283-292
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.010618771 = product of:
0.021237543 = sum of:
0.021237543 = product of:
0.042475086 = sum of:
0.042475086 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042475086 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.01
0.010618771 = product of:
0.021237543 = sum of:
0.021237543 = product of:
0.042475086 = sum of:
0.042475086 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042475086 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.01
0.010618771 = product of:
0.021237543 = sum of:
0.021237543 = product of:
0.042475086 = sum of:
0.042475086 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042475086 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Wheatley, A.; Armstrong, C.J.: Metadata, recall, and abstracts : can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value? (1997)
0.01
0.010427962 = product of:
0.020855924 = sum of:
0.020855924 = product of:
0.04171185 = sum of:
0.04171185 = weight(_text_:5 in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04171185 = score(doc=824,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.27357182 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Abstracts from 7 Internet subject trees (Euroferret, Excite, Infoseek, Lycos Top 5%, Magellan, WebCrawler, Yahoo!), 5 Internet subject gateways (ADAM, EEVL, NetFirst, OMNI, SOSIG), and 3 online databases (ERIC, ISI, LISA) were examined for their subject content, treatment of various enriching features, physical properties such as overall length, anf their readability. Considerable differences were measured, and consistent similarities among abstracts from each type of source were demonstrated. Internet subject tree abstracts were generally the shortest, and online database abstracts the longest. Subject tree and online database abstracts were the most informative, but the level of coverage of document features such as tables, bibliographies, and geographical constraints were disappointingly poor. On balance, the Internet gateways appeared to be providing the most satisfactory abstracts. The authors discuss the continuing role in networked information retrieval of abstracts and their functional analoques such as metadata
-
Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996)
0.01
0.009831577 = product of:
0.019663153 = sum of:
0.019663153 = product of:
0.039326306 = sum of:
0.039326306 = weight(_text_:5 in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039326306 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.257926 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 36(1996) no.5, S.1050 (V.K. Raman); Information processing and management 33(1997) no.4, S.573 (H.R. Tibbo)
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995)
0.01
0.008602629 = product of:
0.017205259 = sum of:
0.017205259 = product of:
0.034410518 = sum of:
0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034410518 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674
-
Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995)
0.01
0.008602629 = product of:
0.017205259 = sum of:
0.017205259 = product of:
0.034410518 = sum of:
0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034410518 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.769-776
-
Rothkegel, A.: Abstracting from the perspective of text production (1995)
0.01
0.008602629 = product of:
0.017205259 = sum of:
0.017205259 = product of:
0.034410518 = sum of:
0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034410518 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.777-784
-
Bowman, J.H.: Annotation: a lost art in cataloguing (2007)
0.01
0.008602629 = product of:
0.017205259 = sum of:
0.017205259 = product of:
0.034410518 = sum of:
0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034410518 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 6.2001 12:25:05
-
Koltay, T.: Abstracting: information literacy on a professional level (2009)
0.01
0.008602629 = product of:
0.017205259 = sum of:
0.017205259 = product of:
0.034410518 = sum of:
0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 3610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034410518 = score(doc=3610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 3610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.841-855
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998)
0.01
0.0073736827 = product of:
0.014747365 = sum of:
0.014747365 = product of:
0.02949473 = sum of:
0.02949473 = weight(_text_:5 in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02949473 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.052250203 = queryNorm
0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Isbn
- 1-85604-268-5
