Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.10

0.09923969 = product of:
  0.19847938 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract: The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
Date: 9. 4.2000 17:22:00

Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.02

0.024275057 = product of:
  0.09710023 = sum of:
    0.09710023 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09710023 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
Source: Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22

Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.02
```
0.017165057 = product of:
  0.06866023 = sum of:
    0.06866023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06866023 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.02
```
0.017165057 = product of:
  0.06866023 = sum of:
    0.06866023 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06866023 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings

Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.02

0.017165057 = product of:
  0.06866023 = sum of:
    0.06866023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06866023 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors