-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.09
0.092520505 = product of:
0.27756152 = sum of:
0.27756152 = sum of:
0.16901751 = weight(_text_:index in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16901751 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.108544 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108544 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.08
0.080955446 = product of:
0.24286632 = sum of:
0.24286632 = sum of:
0.14789033 = weight(_text_:index in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14789033 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.09497599 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09497599 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.08
0.080955446 = product of:
0.24286632 = sum of:
0.24286632 = sum of:
0.14789033 = weight(_text_:index in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14789033 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.09497599 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09497599 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.08
0.080955446 = product of:
0.24286632 = sum of:
0.24286632 = sum of:
0.14789033 = weight(_text_:index in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14789033 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.09497599 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09497599 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.08
0.080955446 = product of:
0.24286632 = sum of:
0.24286632 = sum of:
0.14789033 = weight(_text_:index in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14789033 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.09497599 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09497599 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007)
0.07
0.06688183 = product of:
0.20064548 = sum of:
0.20064548 = sum of:
0.14637348 = weight(_text_:index in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14637348 = score(doc=737,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.6689808 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.054272 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054272 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Recycling eines Buchregisters Eine Index-Revision liegt dann vor, wenn das Register zu einer vorhergehenden Auflage eines Buches für die Neuauflage überarbeitet wird. Es gibt Vor- und Nachteile beim Versuch, einen Index zu überarbeiten - sowie verschiedene Erfolgsmaßstäbe. Eine detaillierte Fallstudie wir vorgestellt und die benutzte Software-Methode beschrieben.
- Date
- 8.12.2007 18:41:22
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.06
0.057887748 = product of:
0.17366324 = sum of:
0.17366324 = sum of:
0.13974324 = weight(_text_:index in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13974324 = score(doc=5775,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.63867813 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.03392 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03392 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
-
Dienelt, O.: ¬Ein Workshop über Indexing (2003)
0.04
0.04277275 = product of:
0.12831825 = sum of:
0.12831825 = sum of:
0.104574256 = weight(_text_:index in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104574256 = score(doc=1502,freq=16.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.023743998 = weight(_text_:22 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023743998 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Unter der Leitung von Frank Merrett von der Socieryy of Indexers (www.indexers.org.uk), die in Sheffield ihren Hauptsitz hat, fand am 22. Januar in London ein Workshop statt, in dem Einblicke in das Indexing (Registererstellung) ermöglicht wurden. SechsTeilnehmerinnen und drei Teilnehmer (Bibliothekare, Katalogisierer, angehende Indexer, Benutzer von Indices) bekamen durch Merrett neben den grundlegenden Dingen auch ein wenig Einblick in die Berufswirklichkeit eines Indexers vermittelt. Zunächst wurden einige Definitionen dessen, was ein Index ist, angesprochen: Ein Index (Register) ist eine systematische Anordnung von Eintragungen, die es dem Benutzer ermöglichen, Informationen in einem Dokument zu finden (nach Norm BS ISO 999,1996). Auch andere Definitionen besagen, dass die im Hauptteil eines Dokuments enthaltenen Informationen so herausgefiltert werden sollen, dass durch die Benutzung des Registers ein möglichst benutzerfreundlicher Zugang zum Hauptteil erfolgen kann. Ein Index soll den einen Benutzer entscheiden lassen, ob ein Dokument etwas für ihn Interessantes enthält. Dem anderen soll es dazu dienen, das Gelesene wieder aufzufrischen. Ein Index muss beiden gerecht werden. Nach Eintreffen des Materials vom Verlag (sehr oft als Papierausdruck) beginnt der erste Schritt, der vom persönlichen Arbeitsstil des Indexers abhängt. Manche beginnen sofort beim Lesen mit dem Niederschreiben von Begriffen, oft unter Verwendung von Software (Macrex, Cindex), andere markieren oder unterstreichen zunächst die relevanten Begriffe. Hier beginnt die eigentliche Arbeit, die darin besteht, wichtige Informationen aus dem Text herauszufiltern und so aufzubereiten, dass ein Buchleser zu Wichtigem hingeführt wird. Dazu gehören Entscheidungen wie zum Beispiel »was ist wichtig«, »was kann/ muss weggelassen werden«, »wo müssen Siehe- beziehungsweise Siehe-auch-Verweise eingebrachtwerden«. Bibliothekarisch gesehen, ist dies Sacherschließung und zugleich formale Erfassung, letztlich das Aufbauen eines Kreuzkatalogs. So wie ein Sacherschließer muss auch ein Indexer ständig überlegen, mit welchen Begriffen er dem Benutzer des Registers einen guten Zugang zur Information verschaffen kann. Ein gutes Verständnis des Faches, das in der Vorlage behandelt wird, ist deshalb unbedingt notwendig. Das wurde anhand einiger Seiten geübt, genauso wie das Aufbe-reiten des Index. Äußerste Genauigkeit ist hier nötig. Anhand eines fertigen Index mit eingebauten Ungenauigkeiten wurde geübt, sehr genau hinzuschauen und kleinste Ungenauigkeiten zu erkennen. Merrett sagte, dass ein gut geschriebenes Buch besser zu bearbeiten sei als eines, das einen weniger guten Hauptteil hat. Oft hat ein Indexer nur zwei Wochen Zeit für die Erstellung eines Registers. Die wenigsten dürften allerdings ständig von morgens bis abends an einem Index arbeiten, und nur sehr wenige verdienen ausschließlich mit dem Erstellen von Registern ihren Lebensunterhalt. Meistens ist dies ein Nebenjob. Nach Frank Merrett sind die Verhandlungen mit einem Verlag über einen zu erstellenden Index recht vorsichtig zu führen. Insbesondere über die Termine (Eintreffen des Manuskripts, Abliefern des Produkts) sowie die Form der Vorlage (welches Format, welcher Umfang) muss sich ein Indexer absichern, um keine Überraschungen zu erleben. So kann es sein, dass die Vorlage nicht als Buch, sondern als ein Stapel von Druckbogen, ungefalzt und unsortiert, ankommt. Auch das Honorar muß vom Indexer in Anbetracht des zu erwartenden Aufwandes verhandelt werden. Indexer ist keine geschützte Bezeichnung, deshalb kann sich jeder so nennen. Die Prüfungen, die man bei der Sociery of Indexers ablegen kann, sind aber ein Qualitätsnachweis. Die Society kann durch das Aufführen der Namen und Spezialgebiete auf der Homepage beziehungsweise in einem Verzeichnis einiges für die Mitglieder tun. Die Sociery legt auf das Kontakthalten mit Verlegern großen Wert, um dort auf die Dienste der Indexer hinzuweisen. Um Aufträge muß sich aber jeder selbst kümmern.
-
Van der Meij, H.: Styling the index : is it time for a change? (2002)
0.02
0.024648389 = product of:
0.073945165 = sum of:
0.073945165 = product of:
0.14789033 = sum of:
0.14789033 = weight(_text_:index in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14789033 = score(doc=3822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Mulvany, N.C.: Back-of-the-book indexing (2009)
0.02
0.024395581 = product of:
0.07318674 = sum of:
0.07318674 = product of:
0.14637348 = sum of:
0.14637348 = weight(_text_:index in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14637348 = score(doc=3749,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.6689808 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The book index occupies a special niche in the information retrieval world. Each index is a unique, authored work. Each book is a closed system. The text presented in a book does not change; the material is stable and fixed. Book indexers provide readers with a nonlinear way to access information in a text. Even though closed-system indexing predates the development of the printing press, a book index can be thought of as hypertext.
-
Bosschieter, P.: Translate the index or index the translation? (2007)
0.02
0.019918907 = product of:
0.05975672 = sum of:
0.05975672 = product of:
0.11951344 = sum of:
0.11951344 = weight(_text_:index in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11951344 = score(doc=736,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Hedden, H.: Book-style indexes for websites (2007)
0.02
0.019918907 = product of:
0.05975672 = sum of:
0.05975672 = product of:
0.11951344 = sum of:
0.11951344 = weight(_text_:index in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11951344 = score(doc=746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Site-Indexe entsprechen Buchregistern mit Hyperlink-Einträgen und sind eine nützliche Methode zur Informationssuche innerhalb einer Website. Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Arten von Websites, für die sich ein Site-Index am besten eignet, und vergleicht Site-Indexe mit Buchregistern bezüglich Struktur, Fundstellenangaben, Untereinträgen und Querverweisen. Bestimmte Modifikationen sind nötig, um einen Index den Erfordernissen von Websites anzupassen Obwohl es nicht schwierig ist, einen Webindex aufzubauen, ist die fortlaufende Aktualisierung eine Kernfrage. Site-Indexe werden nicht so häufig eingesetzt, wie sie könnten
-
Hedden, H.: Creating an index for your Web site to make info easier to see (2006)
0.02
0.019918907 = product of:
0.05975672 = sum of:
0.05975672 = product of:
0.11951344 = sum of:
0.11951344 = weight(_text_:index in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11951344 = score(doc=2189,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Most libraries have long had their own Web sites. The longer a library has had a Web site the more likely it is that the number of pages, and the amount of information within those pages, has grown beyond what users can find simply with the navigation menu. Building a site index is a great way to help seekers find all those bits of data they might otherwise miss.
-
Hert, C.A.; Jacob, E.K.; Dawson, P.: ¬A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment (2000)
0.02
0.019684099 = product of:
0.059052292 = sum of:
0.059052292 = product of:
0.118104585 = sum of:
0.118104585 = weight(_text_:index in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118104585 = score(doc=5158,freq=10.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5397815 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Usability of Web sites has become an increasingly important area of research as Web sites proliferate and problems with use are noted. Generally, aspects of Web sites that have been investigated focus on such areas as overall design and navigation. The exploratory study reported on here investigates one specific component of a Web site-the index structure. By employing index usability metrics developed by Liddy and Jörgensen (1993; Jörgensen & Liddy, 1996) and modified to accommodate a hypertext environment, the study compared the effectiveness and efficiency of 20 subjects who used one existing index (the A-Z index on the FedStats Web site at http://www.fedstats.gov) and three experimental variants to complete five researcher-generated tasks. User satisfaction with the indexes was also evaluated. The findings indicate that a hypertext index with multiple access points for each concept, all linked to the same resource, led to greater effectiveness and efficiency of retrieval on almost all measures. Satisfaction measures were more variable. The study offers insight into potential improvements in the design of Web-based indexes and provides preliminary assessment of the validity of the measures employed
-
Holbert, S.: How to index Windows-based online help (2000)
0.02
0.018296685 = product of:
0.05489005 = sum of:
0.05489005 = product of:
0.1097801 = sum of:
0.1097801 = weight(_text_:index in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1097801 = score(doc=224,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.50173557 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Today, more and more software packages come with online documentation. Some have complete manuals as well. Others have basic documentation on paper and more advanced information online. I recently purchased a computer that came with 20 software programs and not one page of written documentation. More and more, users have to find information by searching online. Most documentation teams focus on writing and ignore the problems of information retrieval, making information in printed documents difficult to find, and online information impossible to find. With online Help, you cannot browse the documentation. You cannot even browse more than a couple of inches of the index at a time. If online users do not get superb guidance into the jungle of online Help, they go away like the hero of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, saying "Oh, the horror! The horror!" How does an online Help index work? The following examples are based on the Windows 95 Help-type system, but do not represent actual Help screens
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.02
0.018090667 = product of:
0.054272 = sum of:
0.054272 = product of:
0.108544 = sum of:
0.108544 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108544 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.02
0.018090667 = product of:
0.054272 = sum of:
0.054272 = product of:
0.108544 = sum of:
0.108544 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108544 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.02
0.018090667 = product of:
0.054272 = sum of:
0.054272 = product of:
0.108544 = sum of:
0.108544 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108544 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Rowland, M.J.: Plunging in : creating a Web site index for an online newsletter (2000)
0.02
0.017605992 = product of:
0.052817974 = sum of:
0.052817974 = product of:
0.10563595 = sum of:
0.10563595 = weight(_text_:index in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10563595 = score(doc=221,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Creating an online index for a Web site is not a job for the timid. Those contemplating this form of Web indexing should already be accomplished indexers and should have strong experience in Web page creation. Knowledge of HTML is essential. In fact, depending on the nature of a Web indexing job, you may find that it requires more HTML knowledge than indexing skill. Like embedded indexing, Web site indexing is far more work than traditional indexing: the choice of terms is constrained, and the indexing process itself is slower and more challenging. Entries must be carefully chosen because the editing process can be tedious and time-consuming, sometimes more time-consuming than making the original entries. Hypertext links and anchors must be added, and the index itself must be tested to make sure that links work as intended. Adequate compensation for your project is imperative. Web indexing does have its rewards, though, especially for indexers who are intrigued by the Web and Web page design, for those who like a challenge, and, of course, for those who like to have their work online for all the world to see. This article provides a look at the process of creating a Web index for an online newsletter. It is also applicable to other forms of Web site indexing, and should give the beginning Web site indexer an idea of what to expect on that first job
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.015829332 = product of:
0.047487997 = sum of:
0.047487997 = product of:
0.09497599 = sum of:
0.09497599 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09497599 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050071523 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
