Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Hartmann, K.: PDS: Retrievalsoftware für die Pressedatenbank (1984) 0.02
    0.022975491 = product of:
      0.045950983 = sum of:
        0.045950983 = product of:
          0.091901965 = sum of:
            0.091901965 = weight(_text_:g in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091901965 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.46949342 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die PDS - Pressedatenbank Retrieval Software - ist eine neue Informationsdatenbank-Software. Sie ist einsatzfähig für Literaturhinweise und Volltextspeicherung. Sie läuft auf IBM-kompatiblem Rechnern. Sie wurde auf dem Hintergrund zehnjähriger Erfahrung im Umgang mit Datenbanken entworfen. PDS verfügt über eine einzigartige phonetische Abfragemöglichkeit, über ein Programm zur Herstellung gedruckter Register und eine Schnittstelle zu dem elektronischen Massenspeicher MEGADOC von Philips. In der G+J Pressedatenbank sind derzeit mehr als 1,4 Mio Datensätze gespeichert. Die G+J Dokumentation versorgt mehr als 800 Redakteure mit Textinformation und Bildern
  2. Anderson, J.D.; Radford, G.: Back-of-the-book indexing with the nested phrase indexing system (NEPHIS) (1988) 0.02
    0.016246125 = product of:
      0.03249225 = sum of:
        0.03249225 = product of:
          0.0649845 = sum of:
            0.0649845 = weight(_text_:g in 653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0649845 = score(doc=653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.331982 = fieldWeight in 653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=653)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Bradley, P.: Indexes to works of fiction : the views of producers and users on the need for them (1989) 0.01
    0.01196698 = product of:
      0.02393396 = sum of:
        0.02393396 = product of:
          0.09573584 = sum of:
            0.09573584 = weight(_text_:authors in 5816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09573584 = score(doc=5816,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5816, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5816)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Over many years there have been occasionally items in The Indexer on the question of whatever fiction needs to be indexed. An attempt is made here to bring together the views of authors, publishers, reviewers, readers, literary societies and indexers in order to see what the various groups of fiction users think of the matter

Languages