Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994) 0.01 
    0.005061713 = product of:
  0.040493704 = sum of:
    0.0071252417 = weight(_text_:information in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071252417 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
    0.033368465 = product of:
      0.06673693 = sum of:
        0.06673693 = weight(_text_:engineering in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06673693 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16061439 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  2. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997) 0.01 
    0.005061713 = product of:
  0.040493704 = sum of:
    0.0071252417 = weight(_text_:information in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071252417 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
    0.033368465 = product of:
      0.06673693 = sum of:
        0.06673693 = weight(_text_:engineering in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06673693 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16061439 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  3. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.00 
    0.004564658 = product of:
  0.036517262 = sum of:
    0.0122147 = weight(_text_:information in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0122147 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
    0.02430256 = product of:
      0.04860512 = sum of:
        0.04860512 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04860512 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today / American Society of Indexers
  4. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.00 
    0.0030431054 = product of:
  0.024344843 = sum of:
    0.0081431335 = weight(_text_:information in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0081431335 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
    0.016201708 = product of:
      0.032403417 = sum of:
        0.032403417 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032403417 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
  5. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.00 
    0.0030316385 = product of:
  0.024253108 = sum of:
    0.010076613 = weight(_text_:information in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010076613 = score(doc=7288,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
    0.014176494 = product of:
      0.028352989 = sum of:
        0.028352989 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028352989 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
    Imprint
    Philadelphia, PA : National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services
  6. Chisman, J.K.: Creating keyword indexes using PC-File Plus (1991) 0.00 
    0.002979327 = product of:
  0.047669232 = sum of:
    0.047669232 = product of:
      0.095338464 = sum of:
        0.095338464 = weight(_text_:engineering in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095338464 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16061439 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.5935861 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Describes the work undertaken at the Owen Science and Engineering Library, Washington State University, to create a keyword index to the National Library of Medicine's Quick Bibliographic Series using the PC-File Plus software
  7. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.00 
    0.00151891 = product of:
  0.02430256 = sum of:
    0.02430256 = product of:
      0.04860512 = sum of:
        0.04860512 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04860512 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  8. Wittmann, C.: Limitations of indexing modules in word-processing software (1991) 0.00 
    0.0014420971 = product of:
  0.023073554 = sum of:
    0.023073554 = weight(_text_:der in 8076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023073554 = score(doc=8076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 8076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8076)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Eigenschaften und Grenzen einer Registerherstellung mit Standardmodulen der Textverarbeitung
  9. Diesing, K.: Register zu Büchern : Bedeutung, Beschaffenheit, Evaluation. Dargestellt an ausgewählten Beispielen aus dem Bereich der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1997) 0.00 
    0.0014420971 = product of:
  0.023073554 = sum of:
    0.023073554 = weight(_text_:der in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023073554 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
  10. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.00 
    0.0014320422 = product of:
  0.022912676 = sum of:
    0.022912676 = product of:
      0.04582535 = sum of:
        0.04582535 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04582535 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  11. Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Constructing indices from citations in collections of research papers (1999) 0.00 
    0.0010908253 = product of:
  0.017453205 = sum of:
    0.017453205 = weight(_text_:information in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017453205 = score(doc=6682,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    We describe Rosetta, an indexing and retrieval system for collections of research papers. Rosetta indexes papers in a collection based on the way they have been described when referenced by other papers in the collection. With this technique, indices for papers describe information provided in the same way a query describes information needed. Using Rosetta, simple natural language queries retrieve high-precision results in which descriptions based on citations clearly summarize retrieved papers; allowing users to quickly determine which papers most closely meet their information needs
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  12. Liddy, E.C.; Jorgensen, C.L.: Reality check! : Book index characteristics that ficilitate information access (1993) 0.00 
    0.0010796371 = product of:
  0.017274193 = sum of:
    0.017274193 = weight(_text_:information in 7769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017274193 = score(doc=7769,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 7769, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7769)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
  13. Kunze, H.: Über das Registermachen (1992) 0.00 
    0.0010197167 = product of:
  0.016315468 = sum of:
    0.016315468 = weight(_text_:der in 212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016315468 = score(doc=212,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 212, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=212)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Classification
    AK 39580 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Technik der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit / Abfassen schriftlicher Arbeiten
    RVK
    AK 39580 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Technik der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit / Abfassen schriftlicher Arbeiten
  14. Williams, P.L.; Bakewell, K.G.B.: Indexing children's information books (1999) 0.00 
    0.0010178917 = product of:
  0.016286267 = sum of:
    0.016286267 = weight(_text_:information in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016286267 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
  15. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.00 
    0.0010126068 = product of:
  0.016201708 = sum of:
    0.016201708 = product of:
      0.032403417 = sum of:
        0.032403417 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032403417 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  16. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.00 
    0.0010126068 = product of:
  0.016201708 = sum of:
    0.016201708 = product of:
      0.032403417 = sum of:
        0.032403417 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032403417 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  17. Jörgensen, C.; Liddy, E.D.: Information access or information anxiety? : an explanatory evaluation of book index features (1996) 0.00 
    8.996976E-4 = product of:
  0.0143951615 = sum of:
    0.0143951615 = weight(_text_:information in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0143951615 = score(doc=6855,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
  18. Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996) 0.00 
    8.996976E-4 = product of:
  0.0143951615 = sum of:
    0.0143951615 = weight(_text_:information in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0143951615 = score(doc=7185,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Considers the indexing of scientific and medical periodicals, covering the need for indexes, the effect on information retrieval of the electronic revolution, types of journals and entries, the process of indexing, cumulation and publisher-indexer relations
  19. Liddy, E.D.; Jorgensen, C.: Modelling information seeking behaviours in index use (1993) 0.00 
    8.906552E-4 = product of:
  0.014250483 = sum of:
    0.014250483 = weight(_text_:information in 7920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014250483 = score(doc=7920,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7920, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7920)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Part of a larger study which aims to: empirically investigate book-index usage, behaviours, and the extent to which specific print index features affect a user's search for information; and to examine these features in an electronic environment and to determine the optimum specifications for indexes in electronic texts by gathering evidence from a controlled user study. Provides an overview of the research project, focusing on a subset of the results from the study of hard-copy book indexes. Describes observable behaviours of a sample of users when consulting different variations of a hard copy book index. Suggests a preliminary model at 3 levels of abstraction repressing users' behaviours when using a book index
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
    Source
    Integrating technologies - converging professions: proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, OH, 24-28 October 1993. Ed.: S. Bonzi
  20. Z39.4-199X: Indexes and related information retrieval devices (1993) 0.00 
    8.906552E-4 = product of:
  0.014250483 = sum of:
    0.014250483 = weight(_text_:information in 8518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014250483 = score(doc=8518,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 8518, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8518)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Authors

Languages

  • e 52
  • d 2
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 44
  • m 6
  • r 2
  • n 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications