Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.032427978 = product of:
  0.08106994 = sum of:
    0.036139302 = weight(_text_:j in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036139302 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
    0.044930637 = weight(_text_:b in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044930637 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Angesichts der wachsenden Zahl von Fachbüchern, die entweder gar kein Sachregister haben oder deren Register nur von schlechter bis indiskutabeler Qualität sind - z. B. automatisch erzeugte Konkordanzen oder eingebettete Register (Index-Marken im Text mit oft übersehenen Nachteilen für die Qualität) -, sieht sich das Deutsche Netzwerk der Indexer zu einem Plädoyer für gute Register veranlasst.

0.0149035035 = product of:
  0.03725876 = sum of:
    0.018069651 = weight(_text_:j in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018069651 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
    0.01918911 = weight(_text_:u in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01918911 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Footnote

Rez. in: IWP 64(2013) H.6, S.373-374 (J. Fassbender)

Theme

Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur