Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.09 
    0.0884189 = product of:
  0.22104725 = sum of:
    0.15413849 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15413849 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
    0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06690876 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  2. McFadden, T.: Editors on indexes (1993) 0.03 
    0.03421662 = product of:
  0.1710831 = sum of:
    0.1710831 = weight(_text_:7 in 7633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1710831 = score(doc=7633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.73202527 = fieldWeight in 7633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7633)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Keywords. 1(1993) no.7, S.1-3
  3. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.03 
    0.030586867 = product of:
  0.15293433 = sum of:
    0.15293433 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15293433 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  4. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.03 
    0.030586867 = product of:
  0.15293433 = sum of:
    0.15293433 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15293433 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  5. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.03 
    0.030586867 = product of:
  0.15293433 = sum of:
    0.15293433 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15293433 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  6. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.03 
    0.030586867 = product of:
  0.15293433 = sum of:
    0.15293433 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15293433 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  7. Mulvany, J.D.: Teaching book indexing : a curriculum (2002) 0.03 
    0.027373297 = product of:
  0.13686648 = sum of:
    0.13686648 = weight(_text_:7 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13686648 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 23(2002) no.1, S.2-7
  8. Lipetz, B.A.: Counting heads : what is the ideal index structure? (1993) 0.03 
    0.027373297 = product of:
  0.13686648 = sum of:
    0.13686648 = weight(_text_:7 in 7565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13686648 = score(doc=7565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 7565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7565)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Keywords. 1(1993) no.7, S.8-12
  9. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  10. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  11. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  13. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  14. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  15. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  16. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  17. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.03 
    0.026763504 = product of:
  0.13381752 = sum of:
    0.13381752 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13381752 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  18. Booth, P.F.: Indexing : the manual of good practice (2001) 0.02 
    0.024459152 = product of:
  0.06114788 = sum of:
    0.04403957 = weight(_text_:objects in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04403957 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.117447585 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
    0.01710831 = weight(_text_:7 in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01710831 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.07320253 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd - Information Wissenschaft und Praxis 54(2003) H.7, S.440-442 (R. Fugmann): "Das Buch beginnt mit dem Kapitel "Myths about Indexing" und mit der Nennung von weit verbreiteten Irrtümern über das Indexieren, und zwar vorrangig über das Registermachen. Mit einem einzigen Satz ist die Problematik treffend skizziert, welcher das Buch gewidmet ist: "With the development of electronic documents, it has become possible to store very large amounts of information; but storage is not of much use without the capability to retrieve, to convert, transfer and reuse the information". Kritisiert wird die weit verbreitet anzutreffende Ansicht, das Indexieren sei lediglich eine Sache vom "picking out words from the text or naming objects in images and using those words as index headings". Eine solche Arbeitsweise führt jedoch nicht zu Registern, sondern zu Konkordanzen (d.h. zu alphabetischen Fundstellenlisten für Textwörter) und"... is entirely dependent an the words themselves and is not concerned with the ideas behind them". Das Sammeln von Information ist einfach. Aber die (Wieder-) Auffindbarkeit herzustellen muss gelernt werden, wenn mehr ermöglicht werden soll als lediglich das Wiederfinden von Texten, die man in allen Einzelheiten noch genau in Erinnerung behalten hat (known-item searches, questions of recall), die Details der sprachlichen Ausdrucksweise für die gesuchten Begriffe eingeschlossen. Die Verfasserin beschreibt aus ihrer großen praktischen Erfahrung, welche Schritte hierzu auf der gedanklichen und technischen Ebene unternommen werden müssen. Zu den erstgenannten Schritten rechnet die Abtrennung von Details, welche nicht im Index vertreten sein sollten ("unsought terms"), weil sie mit Sicherheit kein Suchziel darstellen werden und als "false friends" zur Überflutung des Suchenden mit Nebensächlichkeiten führen würden, eine Entscheidung, welche nur mit guter Sachkenntnis gefällt werden kann. All Dasjenige hingegen, was in Gegenwart und Zukunft (!) ein sinnvolles Suchziel darstellen könnte und "sufficiently informative" ist, verdient ein Schlagwort im Register. Man lernt auch durch lehrreiche Beispiele, wodurch ein Textwort unbrauchbar für das Register wird, wenn es dort als (schlechtes) Schlagwort erscheint, herausgelöst aus dem interpretierenden Zusammenhang, in welchen es im Text eingebettet gewesen ist. Auch muss die Vieldeutigkeit bereinigt werden, die fast jedem natursprachigen Wort anhaftet. Sonst wird der Suchende beim Nachschlagen allzu oft in die Irre geführt, und zwar um so öfter, je größer ein diesbezüglich unbereinigter Speicher bereits geworden ist.
  19. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing, teaching of, See: Information retrieval design (2002) 0.02 
    0.023951633 = product of:
  0.11975816 = sum of:
    0.11975816 = weight(_text_:7 in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11975816 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 23(2002) no.1, S.2-7
  20. Anker, J.: Some principles of a systematically arranged subject catalogue with an index (1956) 0.02 
    0.023951633 = product of:
  0.11975816 = sum of:
    0.11975816 = weight(_text_:7 in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11975816 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Libri. 7(1956-58) no.1, S.55-70

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 5

Types

  • a 36
  • m 10
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications