Search (135 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.05
    0.047408134 = product of:
      0.09481627 = sum of:
        0.016034503 = weight(_text_:information in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016034503 = score(doc=749,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
        0.07878176 = sum of:
          0.033664808 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033664808 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047571484 = queryNorm
              0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045116954 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047571484 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.441-444
  2. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.04
    0.03939088 = product of:
      0.15756352 = sum of:
        0.15756352 = sum of:
          0.067329615 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067329615 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047571484 = queryNorm
              0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.09023391 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09023391 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047571484 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  3. Bennion, B.C.: Performance testing of a book and its index as an information retrieval system (1980) 0.03
    0.032866906 = product of:
      0.06573381 = sum of:
        0.032069005 = weight(_text_:information in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032069005 = score(doc=7763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
        0.033664808 = product of:
          0.067329615 = sum of:
            0.067329615 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067329615 = score(doc=7763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 31(1980), S.264-270
  4. Armitage, J.E.; Lynch, M.F.: Some structural characteristics of articulated subject indexes (1968) 0.03
    0.032194868 = product of:
      0.064389735 = sum of:
        0.025915671 = weight(_text_:information in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025915671 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
        0.038474064 = product of:
          0.07694813 = sum of:
            0.07694813 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07694813 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 4(1968) no.2, S.101-111
  5. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.03
    0.029054213 = product of:
      0.058108427 = sum of:
        0.019436752 = weight(_text_:information in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019436752 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
        0.038671676 = product of:
          0.07734335 = sum of:
            0.07734335 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07734335 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today / American Society of Indexers
  6. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing, teaching of, See: Information retrieval design (2002) 0.03
    0.028170511 = product of:
      0.056341022 = sum of:
        0.022676213 = weight(_text_:information in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022676213 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
        0.033664808 = product of:
          0.067329615 = sum of:
            0.067329615 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067329615 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  7. Z39.4-199X: Indexes and related information retrieval devices (1993) 0.03
    0.028170511 = product of:
      0.056341022 = sum of:
        0.022676213 = weight(_text_:information in 8518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022676213 = score(doc=8518,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 8518, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8518)
        0.033664808 = product of:
          0.067329615 = sum of:
            0.067329615 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067329615 = score(doc=8518,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 8518, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8518)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  8. Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992) 0.02
    0.024824452 = product of:
      0.049648903 = sum of:
        0.02244363 = weight(_text_:information in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02244363 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.027205272 = product of:
          0.054410543 = sum of:
            0.054410543 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054410543 = score(doc=3053,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Consideration of some of the choices for computerization of indexes, including word processing, records administration systems, and text-retrieval packages. Some of the general concepts relating to indexes are also covered, including various approaches to indexing such as subject, word, and hierarchical indexing, and the use of coordinated themes. The options available within each type of computerization of indexing are also specified
    Source
    Information management and technology. 25(1992) no.3, S.120-122
  9. Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996) 0.02
    0.023476362 = product of:
      0.046952724 = sum of:
        0.022906432 = weight(_text_:information in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022906432 = score(doc=7185,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
        0.02404629 = product of:
          0.04809258 = sum of:
            0.04809258 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04809258 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the indexing of scientific and medical periodicals, covering the need for indexes, the effect on information retrieval of the electronic revolution, types of journals and entries, the process of indexing, cumulation and publisher-indexer relations
  10. Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Constructing indices from citations in collections of research papers (1999) 0.02
    0.02230249 = product of:
      0.04460498 = sum of:
        0.027772574 = weight(_text_:information in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027772574 = score(doc=6682,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
        0.016832404 = product of:
          0.033664808 = sum of:
            0.033664808 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033664808 = score(doc=6682,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    We describe Rosetta, an indexing and retrieval system for collections of research papers. Rosetta indexes papers in a collection based on the way they have been described when referenced by other papers in the collection. With this technique, indices for papers describe information provided in the same way a query describes information needed. Using Rosetta, simple natural language queries retrieve high-precision results in which descriptions based on citations clearly summarize retrieved papers; allowing users to quickly determine which papers most closely meet their information needs
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  11. Mulvany, N.C.: Back-of-the-book indexing (2009) 0.02
    0.020840332 = product of:
      0.041680664 = sum of:
        0.02244363 = weight(_text_:information in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02244363 = score(doc=3749,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
        0.019237032 = product of:
          0.038474064 = sum of:
            0.038474064 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474064 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The book index occupies a special niche in the information retrieval world. Each index is a unique, authored work. Each book is a closed system. The text presented in a book does not change; the material is stable and fixed. Book indexers provide readers with a nonlinear way to access information in a text. Even though closed-system indexing predates the development of the printing press, a book index can be thought of as hypertext.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  12. Craven, T.C.: Adapting of string indexing systems for retrieval using proximity operators (1988) 0.02
    0.020081554 = product of:
      0.040163107 = sum of:
        0.012957836 = weight(_text_:information in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012957836 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
        0.027205272 = product of:
          0.054410543 = sum of:
            0.054410543 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054410543 = score(doc=705,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the idea of using a conventional string indexing source description, together with a special phrase generator, to generate multiple descriptor phrases for inclusion in a database record for online retrieval. For use with proximity operators, these multiple descriptor phrases should attempt to meet such objectives as bringing together groups of syntactically related words. Software for generating multiple descriptor phrases from source descriptions in a specific existing string indexing system is briefly described
    Source
    Information processing and management. 24(1988), S.133-140
  13. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.02
    0.019369476 = product of:
      0.03873895 = sum of:
        0.012957836 = weight(_text_:information in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012957836 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
        0.025781117 = product of:
          0.051562235 = sum of:
            0.051562235 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051562235 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
  14. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.02
    0.019369476 = product of:
      0.03873895 = sum of:
        0.012957836 = weight(_text_:information in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012957836 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
        0.025781117 = product of:
          0.051562235 = sum of:
            0.051562235 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051562235 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.394-398
  15. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.02
    0.01929649 = product of:
      0.03859298 = sum of:
        0.016034503 = weight(_text_:information in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016034503 = score(doc=7288,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
        0.022558477 = product of:
          0.045116954 = sum of:
            0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045116954 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
    Imprint
    Philadelphia, PA : National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services
  16. Holbert, S.: How to index Windows-based online help (2000) 0.02
    0.019116418 = product of:
      0.038232837 = sum of:
        0.023805063 = weight(_text_:information in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023805063 = score(doc=224,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
        0.014427775 = product of:
          0.02885555 = sum of:
            0.02885555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02885555 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Today, more and more software packages come with online documentation. Some have complete manuals as well. Others have basic documentation on paper and more advanced information online. I recently purchased a computer that came with 20 software programs and not one page of written documentation. More and more, users have to find information by searching online. Most documentation teams focus on writing and ignore the problems of information retrieval, making information in printed documents difficult to find, and online information impossible to find. With online Help, you cannot browse the documentation. You cannot even browse more than a couple of inches of the index at a time. If online users do not get superb guidance into the jungle of online Help, they go away like the hero of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, saying "Oh, the horror! The horror!" How does an online Help index work? The following examples are based on the Windows 95 Help-type system, but do not represent actual Help screens
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
  17. Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996) 0.02
    0.018781088 = product of:
      0.037562177 = sum of:
        0.018325146 = weight(_text_:information in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018325146 = score(doc=740,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
        0.019237032 = product of:
          0.038474064 = sum of:
            0.038474064 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474064 = score(doc=740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an experiment, conducted in Mar 95 in the context of a course at the School of Library and Information Science at the University of Montreal, which evaluates the information retrieval capabilities of a manual index and a semi automated index developed according to the Bennion method. The application of a formula developed by Bennion shows that the indexes are almost identical
  18. BIOSIS introduces new relational indexing scheme and additional information in 1998 (1998) 0.02
    0.018781088 = product of:
      0.037562177 = sum of:
        0.018325146 = weight(_text_:information in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018325146 = score(doc=2595,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
        0.019237032 = product of:
          0.038474064 = sum of:
            0.038474064 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474064 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In 1998 BIOSIS will introduce a new relational indexing system to provide more specific natural language retrieval for its electronic products. Printed publications will have a redesigned subject index to replace the KWIC index and an organism index, replacing the current generic and biosystematic indexes, will allow hierarchical access to kingdom, family and common genus species names
    Source
    Information today. 15(1998) no.4, S.11
  19. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994) 0.02
    0.01757136 = product of:
      0.03514272 = sum of:
        0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011338106 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
        0.023804612 = product of:
          0.047609225 = sum of:
            0.047609225 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047609225 = score(doc=949,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  20. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997) 0.02
    0.01757136 = product of:
      0.03514272 = sum of:
        0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011338106 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
        0.023804612 = product of:
          0.047609225 = sum of:
            0.047609225 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047609225 = score(doc=3905,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost

Years

Languages

  • e 120
  • d 14
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 115
  • m 12
  • n 4
  • s 3
  • r 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications