-
Jindal, V.; Bawa, S.; Batra, S.: ¬A review of ranking approaches for semantic search on Web (2014)
0.03
0.027100323 = product of:
0.10840129 = sum of:
0.10840129 = weight(_text_:engines in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10840129 = score(doc=2799,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.47632706 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- With ever increasing information being available to the end users, search engines have become the most powerful tools for obtaining useful information scattered on the Web. However, it is very common that even most renowned search engines return result sets with not so useful pages to the user. Research on semantic search aims to improve traditional information search and retrieval methods where the basic relevance criteria rely primarily on the presence of query keywords within the returned pages. This work is an attempt to explore different relevancy ranking approaches based on semantics which are considered appropriate for the retrieval of relevant information. In this paper, various pilot projects and their corresponding outcomes have been investigated based on methodologies adopted and their most distinctive characteristics towards ranking. An overview of selected approaches and their comparison by means of the classification criteria has been presented. With the help of this comparison, some common concepts and outstanding features have been identified.
-
Bhansali, D.; Desai, H.; Deulkar, K.: ¬A study of different ranking approaches for semantic search (2015)
0.02
0.022583602 = product of:
0.09033441 = sum of:
0.09033441 = weight(_text_:engines in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09033441 = score(doc=2696,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.39693922 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Search Engines have become an integral part of our day to day life. Our reliance on search engines increases with every passing day. With the amount of data available on Internet increasing exponentially, it becomes important to develop new methods and tools that help to return results relevant to the queries and reduce the time spent on searching. The results should be diverse but at the same time should return results focused on the queries asked. Relation Based Page Rank [4] algorithms are considered to be the next frontier in improvement of Semantic Web Search. The probability of finding relevance in the search results as posited by the user while entering the query is used to measure the relevance. However, its application is limited by the complexity of determining relation between the terms and assigning explicit meaning to each term. Trust Rank is one of the most widely used ranking algorithms for semantic web search. Few other ranking algorithms like HITS algorithm, PageRank algorithm are also used for Semantic Web Searching. In this paper, we will provide a comparison of few ranking approaches.
-
Liu, X.; Zheng, W.; Fang, H.: ¬An exploration of ranking models and feedback method for related entity finding (2013)
0.02
0.015969018 = product of:
0.06387607 = sum of:
0.06387607 = weight(_text_:engines in 2714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06387607 = score(doc=2714,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2806784 = fieldWeight in 2714, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2714)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Most existing search engines focus on document retrieval. However, information needs are certainly not limited to finding relevant documents. Instead, a user may want to find relevant entities such as persons and organizations. In this paper, we study the problem of related entity finding. Our goal is to rank entities based on their relevance to a structured query, which specifies an input entity, the type of related entities and the relation between the input and related entities. We first discuss a general probabilistic framework, derive six possible retrieval models to rank the related entities, and then compare these models both analytically and empirically. To further improve performance, we study the problem of feedback in the context of related entity finding. Specifically, we propose a mixture model based feedback method that can utilize the pseudo feedback entities to estimate an enriched model for the relation between the input and related entities. Experimental results over two standard TREC collections show that the derived relation generation model combined with a relation feedback method performs better than other models.
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.01
0.010620093 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = product of:
0.084960744 = sum of:
0.084960744 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084960744 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.0053100465 = product of:
0.021240186 = sum of:
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.00
0.0045514684 = product of:
0.018205874 = sum of:
0.018205874 = product of:
0.036411747 = sum of:
0.036411747 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036411747 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995)
0.00
0.0037928906 = product of:
0.015171562 = sum of:
0.015171562 = product of:
0.030343125 = sum of:
0.030343125 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030343125 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 13:14:10
-
Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003)
0.00
0.0037928906 = product of:
0.015171562 = sum of:
0.015171562 = product of:
0.030343125 = sum of:
0.030343125 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030343125 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:35:46
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006)
0.00
0.0037928906 = product of:
0.015171562 = sum of:
0.015171562 = product of:
0.030343125 = sum of:
0.030343125 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030343125 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:43
