-
Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003)
0.02
0.024485704 = product of:
0.036728553 = sum of:
0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018455133 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.01827342 = product of:
0.03654684 = sum of:
0.03654684 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03654684 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 17:32:22
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.01
0.0142126605 = product of:
0.04263798 = sum of:
0.04263798 = product of:
0.08527596 = sum of:
0.08527596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08527596 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.01
0.0071063302 = product of:
0.02131899 = sum of:
0.02131899 = product of:
0.04263798 = sum of:
0.04263798 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04263798 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Internet-Suchwerkzeuge im Vergleich (IV) : Relevance Ranking nach "Popularität" von Webseiten: Google (2001)
0.01
0.006151711 = product of:
0.018455133 = sum of:
0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018455133 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Thelwall, M.: Can Google's PageRank be used to find the most important academic Web pages? (2003)
0.01
0.006151711 = product of:
0.018455133 = sum of:
0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018455133 = score(doc=4457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models (2004)
0.01
0.006151711 = product of:
0.018455133 = sum of:
0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018455133 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.; Mat-Hassan, M.: Methods for evaluating dynamic changes in search engine rankings : a case study (2006)
0.01
0.005799889 = product of:
0.017399667 = sum of:
0.017399667 = weight(_text_:m in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017399667 = score(doc=616,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.15552804 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Agosti, M.; Pretto, L.: ¬A theoretical study of a generalized version of kleinberg's HITS algorithm (2005)
0.01
0.005126426 = product of:
0.015379278 = sum of:
0.015379278 = weight(_text_:m in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015379278 = score(doc=4,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044957645 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)