Search (52 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.04
    0.040660214 = product of:
      0.101650536 = sum of:
        0.06324378 = weight(_text_:j in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06324378 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
        0.03840676 = product of:
          0.07681352 = sum of:
            0.07681352 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07681352 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  2. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.04
    0.039470844 = product of:
      0.06578474 = sum of:
        0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023986388 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
        0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02808165 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
        0.0137167005 = product of:
          0.027433401 = sum of:
            0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027433401 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  3. Bhogal, J.; Macfarlane, A.; Smith, P.: ¬A review of ontology based query expansion (2007) 0.03
    0.026081134 = product of:
      0.06520283 = sum of:
        0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03162189 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
        0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03358094 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  4. Lin, J.; Katz, B.: Building a reusable test collection for question answering (2006) 0.02
    0.02432098 = product of:
      0.060802452 = sum of:
        0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027104476 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
        0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033697978 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  5. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.02
    0.022866515 = product of:
      0.057166286 = sum of:
        0.040706247 = weight(_text_:u in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040706247 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.016460039 = product of:
          0.032920077 = sum of:
            0.032920077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032920077 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  6. Nie, J.-Y.: Query expansion and query translation as logical inference (2003) 0.02
    0.022355257 = product of:
      0.05588814 = sum of:
        0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027104476 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
        0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028783662 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  7. Chen, H.; Lally, A.M.; Zhu, B.; Chau, M.: HelpfulMed : Intelligent searching for medical information over the Internet (2003) 0.02
    0.020827217 = product of:
      0.05206804 = sum of:
        0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023986388 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02808165 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Fuhr, N.: Theorie des Information Retrieval I : Modelle (2004) 0.02
    0.020827217 = product of:
      0.05206804 = sum of:
        0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023986388 = score(doc=2912,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
        0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02808165 = score(doc=2912,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information-Retrieval-(IR-)Modelle spezifizieren, wie zur einer gegebenen Anfrage die Antwortdokumente aus einer Dokumentenkollektion bestimmt werden. Dabei macht jedes Modell bestimmte Annahmen über die Struktur von Dokumenten und Anfragen und definiert dann die so genannte Retrievalfunktion, die das Retrievalgewicht eines Dokumentes bezüglich einer Anfrage bestimmt - im Falle des Booleschen Retrieval etwa eines der Gewichte 0 oder 1. Die Dokumente werden dann nach fallenden Gewichten sortiert und dem Benutzer präsentiert. Zunächst sollen hier einige grundlegende Charakteristika von Retrievalmodellen beschrieben werden, bevor auf die einzelnen Modelle näher eingegangen wird. Wie eingangs erwähnt, macht jedes Modell Annahmen über die Struktur von Dokumenten und Fragen. Ein Dokument kann entweder als Menge oder Multimenge von so genannten Termen aufgefasst werden, wobei im zweiten Fall das Mehrfachvorkommen berücksichtigt wird. Dabei subsummiert 'Term' einen Suchbegriff, der ein einzelnes Wort, ein mehrgliedriger Begriff oder auch ein komplexes Freitextmuster sein kann. Diese Dokumentrepräsentation wird wiederum auf eine so genannte Dokumentbeschreibung abgebildet, in der die einzelnen Terme gewichtet sein können; dies ist Aufgabe der in Kapitel B 5 beschriebenen Indexierungsmodelle. Im Folgenden unterscheiden wir nur zwischen ungewichteter (Gewicht eines Terms ist entweder 0 oderl) und gewichteter Indexierung (das Gewicht ist eine nichtnegative reelle Zahl). Ebenso wie bei Dokumenten können auch die Terme in der Frage entweder ungewichtet oder gewichtet sein. Daneben unterscheidet man zwischen linearen (Frage als Menge von Termen, ungewichtet oder gewichtet) und Booleschen Anfragen.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  9. Quiroga, L.M.; Mostafa, J.: ¬An experiment in building profiles in information filtering : the role of context of user relevance feedback (2002) 0.02
    0.018629381 = product of:
      0.046573453 = sum of:
        0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022587063 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
        0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023986388 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  10. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.02
    0.017425805 = product of:
      0.043564513 = sum of:
        0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027104476 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
        0.016460039 = product of:
          0.032920077 = sum of:
            0.032920077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032920077 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
  11. Efthimiadis, E.N.: Interactive query expansion : a user-based evaluation in a relevance feedback environment (2000) 0.02
    0.016661773 = product of:
      0.04165443 = sum of:
        0.01918911 = weight(_text_:u in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01918911 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
        0.022465318 = weight(_text_:b in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022465318 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A user-centered investigation of interactive query expansion within the context of a relevance feedback system is presented in this article. Data were collected from 25 searches using the INSPEC database. The data collection mechanisms included questionnaires, transaction logs, and relevance evaluations. The results discuss issues that relate to query expansion, retrieval effectiveness, the correspondence of the on-line-to-off-line relevance judgments, and the selection of terms for query expansion by users (interactive query expansion). The main conclusions drawn from the results of the study are that: (1) one-third of the terms presented to users in a list of candidate terms for query expansion was identified by the users as potentially useful for query expansion. (2) These terms were mainly judged as either variant expressions (synonyms) or alternative (related) terms to the initial query terms. However, a substantial portion of the selected terms were identified as representing new ideas. (3) The relationships identified between the five best terms selected by the users for query expansion and the initial query terms were that: (a) 34% of the query expansion terms have no relationship or other type of correspondence with a query term; (b) 66% of the remaining query expansion terms have a relationship to the query terms. These relationships were: narrower term (46%), broader term (3%), related term (17%). (4) The results provide evidence for the effectiveness of interactive query expansion. The initial search produced on average three highly relevant documents; the query expansion search produced on average nine further highly relevant documents. The conclusions highlight the need for more research on: interactive query expansion, the comparative evaluation of automatic vs. interactive query expansion, the study of weighted Webbased or Web-accessible retrieval systems in operational environments, and for user studies in searching ranked retrieval systems in general
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  12. Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003) 0.02
    0.015081236 = product of:
      0.03770309 = sum of:
        0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023986388 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.0137167005 = product of:
          0.027433401 = sum of:
            0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027433401 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:35:46
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  13. Silveira, M.; Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Concept-based ranking : a case study in the juridical domain (2004) 0.01
    0.013479191 = product of:
      0.067395955 = sum of:
        0.067395955 = weight(_text_:b in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067395955 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  14. Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001) 0.01
    0.012648756 = product of:
      0.06324378 = sum of:
        0.06324378 = weight(_text_:j in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06324378 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Roh, J.-E.; Lee, J.-H.: ¬An empirical study of query expansion and cluster-based retrieval in language modeling approach (2007) 0.01
    0.008944021 = product of:
      0.044720102 = sum of:
        0.044720102 = weight(_text_:j in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044720102 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  16. Shah, B.; Raghavan, V.; Dhatric, P.; Zhao, X.: ¬A cluster-based approach for efficient content-based image retrieval using a similarity-preserving space transformation method (2006) 0.01
    0.0079426905 = product of:
      0.03971345 = sum of:
        0.03971345 = weight(_text_:b in 6118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03971345 = score(doc=6118,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 6118, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6118)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The techniques of clustering and space transformation have been successfully used in the past to solve a number of pattern recognition problems. In this article, the authors propose a new approach to content-based image retrieval (CBIR) that uses (a) a newly proposed similarity-preserving space transformation method to transform the original low-level image space into a highlevel vector space that enables efficient query processing, and (b) a clustering scheme that further improves the efficiency of our retrieval system. This combination is unique and the resulting system provides synergistic advantages of using both clustering and space transformation. The proposed space transformation method is shown to preserve the order of the distances in the transformed feature space. This strategy makes this approach to retrieval generic as it can be applied to object types, other than images, and feature spaces more general than metric spaces. The CBIR approach uses the inexpensive "estimated" distance in the transformed space, as opposed to the computationally inefficient "real" distance in the original space, to retrieve the desired results for a given query image. The authors also provide a theoretical analysis of the complexity of their CBIR approach when used for color-based retrieval, which shows that it is computationally more efficient than other comparable approaches. An extensive set of experiments to test the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach has been performed. The results show that the approach offers superior response time (improvement of 1-2 orders of magnitude compared to retrieval approaches that either use pruning techniques like indexing, clustering, etc., or space transformation, but not both) with sufficiently high retrieval accuracy.
  17. Kulyukin, V.A.; Settle, A.: Ranked retrieval with semantic networks and vector spaces (2001) 0.01
    0.007675644 = product of:
      0.03837822 = sum of:
        0.03837822 = weight(_text_:u in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03837822 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  18. Hubert, G.; Mothe, J.: ¬An adaptable search engine for multimodal information retrieval (2009) 0.01
    0.0072278604 = product of:
      0.036139302 = sum of:
        0.036139302 = weight(_text_:j in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036139302 = score(doc=2951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. Zhu, B.; Chen, H.: Validating a geographical image retrieval system (2000) 0.01
    0.0067395954 = product of:
      0.033697978 = sum of:
        0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 4769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033697978 = score(doc=4769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4769)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  20. Drucker, H.; Shahrary, B.; Gibbon, D.C.: Support vector machines : relevance feedback and information retrieval (2002) 0.01
    0.0067395954 = product of:
      0.033697978 = sum of:
        0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 2581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033697978 = score(doc=2581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2581)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    

Languages

  • e 49
  • d 3
  • More… Less…