Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Archuby, C.G.: Interfaces se recuperacion para catalogos en linea con salidas ordenadas por probable relevancia (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026845555 = product of:
  0.021476444 = sum of:
    0.021476444 = product of:
      0.06442933 = sum of:
        0.06442933 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06442933 = score(doc=5727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
    Source
    Ciencia da informacao. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-13
  2. Crestani, F.: Combination of similarity measures for effective spoken document retrieval (2003) 0.00 
    0.0026575741 = product of:
  0.021260593 = sum of:
    0.021260593 = product of:
      0.063781776 = sum of:
        0.063781776 = weight(_text_:29 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063781776 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.2, S.87-96
  3. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026336676 = product of:
  0.02106934 = sum of:
    0.02106934 = product of:
      0.06320802 = sum of:
        0.06320802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06320802 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  4. Okada, M.; Ando, K.; Lee, S.S.; Hayashi, Y.; Aoe, J.I.: ¬An efficient substring search method by using delayed keyword extraction (2001) 0.00 
    0.002277921 = product of:
  0.018223368 = sum of:
    0.018223368 = product of:
      0.0546701 = sum of:
        0.0546701 = weight(_text_:29 in 6415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0546701 = score(doc=6415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6415)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 3.2002 17:24:03
  5. Lanvent, A.: Licht im Daten Chaos (2004) 0.00 
    0.0019121271 = product of:
  0.015297017 = sum of:
    0.015297017 = product of:
      0.06118807 = sum of:
        0.06118807 = weight(_text_:recherche in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06118807 = score(doc=2806,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18062086 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.33876523 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    "Bitte suchen Sie alle Unterlagen, die im PC zum Ibelshäuser-Vertrag in Sprockhövel gespeichert sind. Finden Sie alles, was wir haben - Dokumente, Tabellen, Präsentationen, Scans, E-Mails. Und erledigen Sie das gleich! « Wer diese Aufgabe an das Windows-eigene Suchmodul vergibt, wird zwangsläufig enttäuscht. Denn das Betriebssystem beherrscht weder die formatübergreifende Recherche noch die Kontextsuche, die für solche komplexen Aufträge nötig sind. Professionelle Desktop-Suchmaschinen erledigen Aufgaben dieser Art jedoch im Handumdrehen - genauer gesagt in einer einzigen Sekunde. Spitzenprogramme wie Global Brain benötigen dafür nicht einmal umfangreiche Abfrageformulare. Es genügt, einen Satz im Eingabefeld zu formulieren, der das Thema der gewünschten Dokumente eingrenzt. Dabei suchen die Programme über alle Laufwerke, die sich auf dem System einbinden lassen - also auch im Netzwerk-Ordner (Shared Folder), sofern dieser freigegeben wurde. Allen Testkandidaten - mit Ausnahme von Search 32 - gemeinsam ist, dass sie weitaus bessere Rechercheergebnisse abliefern als Windows, deutlich schneller arbeiten und meist auch in den Online-Postfächern stöbern. Wer schon öfter vergeblich über die Windows-Suche nach wichtigen Dokumenten gefahndet hat, kommt angesichts der Qualität der Search-Engines kaum mehr um die Anschaffung eines Desktop-Suchtools herum. Aber Microsoft will nachbessern. Für den Windows-XP-Nachfolger Longhorn wirbt der Hersteller vor allem mit dem Hinweis auf das neue Dateisystem WinFS, das sämtliche Files auf der Festplatte über Meta-Tags indiziert und dem Anwender damit lange Suchläufe erspart. So sollen sich anders als bei Windows XP alle Dateien zu bestimmten Themen in wenigen Sekunden auflisten lassen - unabhängig vom Format und vom physikalischen Speicherort der Files. Für die Recherche selbst ist dann weder der Dateiname noch das Erstelldatum ausschlaggebend. Anhand der kontextsensitiven Suche von WinFS kann der Anwender einfach einen Suchbefehl wie »Vertragsabschluss mit Firma XYZ, Neunkirchen/Saar« eingeben, der dann ohne Umwege zum Ziel führt."
  6. Lanvent, A.: Know-how - Suchverfahren : Intelligente Suchmaschinen erzielen mit assoziativen und linguistischen Verfahren beste Ergebnisse. (2004) 0.00 
    0.0016900975 = product of:
  0.01352078 = sum of:
    0.01352078 = product of:
      0.05408312 = sum of:
        0.05408312 = weight(_text_:recherche in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05408312 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18062086 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.29942897 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    "Die einfachste Form der Volltextsuche ist die Phrasensuche. Hierbei gilt es, den eingegebenen Text in der exakten Schreibweise in sämtlichen relevanten Dokumenten zu finden. Anhand von Joker-Zeichen wie Stern und Fragezeichen kann der Anwender diese Art der Suche erweitern. Boole'sche Parameter verknüpfen einen, zwei oder mehrere Begriffe zu einem Suchstring. Die häufigsten Parameter lauten UND, ODER und NICHT. So lassen sich auch komplexe Anfragen starten, etwa sollen alle Dokumente gefunden werden, die die Begriffe »Schröder« oder »Schroeder«, aber nicht »Bundeskanzler« enthalten. Kennt der Anwender nicht die exakte Schreibweise oder kommen unterschiedliche Ausprägungen eines Wortes in den gesuchten Dokumenten vor, wie Deklinationen, muss er auf fehlertolerante oder linguistische Verfahren zurückgreifen. Einige Tools wie etwa Dt Search und Findword arbeiten mit Wörterbüchern, die auch Flexionen enthalten. Sucht der Nutzer etwa nach »Baum«, findet das Tool auch »Bäume« oder etwa »Baumstamm«. Bei der phonetischen Suche setzen Programme wie Documind Pro und Findword auf einen Algorithmus, der nach dem ähnlichen Klang der Wörter recherchiert. Solche Verfahren sind demnach sprachenabhängig. Sie nehmen den Suchstring »Meier« zum Anlass, auch »Mayer« oder »Meier« nachzuschlagen. Fuzzy Logic ist ein verwandtes Verfahren, das alternative Schreibweisen oder Tippfehler verzeiht. Dieses Verfahren berücksichtigt auch Abweichungen und stellt dabei fest, dass ein bestimmter Begriff zu einem Wortstamm gehört. Eine solche Methode liefert eine größere Trefferliste und findet bei Eingabe von »Microsoft« auch Dokumente mit »Mircosoft« und »Microaoft«. Die Königsdisziplin ist die Assoziative Suche, die die Recherche nach Eingabe eines beliebigen Satzes in der natürlichen Sprache startet. Das Suchkommando »Die Meistertitel von Borussia Mönchengladbach« findet im Idealfall Texte zu den Themen Fußball, Bundesliga und Netzer."
  7. Thompson, P.: Looking back: on relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval (2008) 0.00 
    0.0015186139 = product of:
  0.012148911 = sum of:
    0.012148911 = product of:
      0.03644673 = sum of:
        0.03644673 = weight(_text_:29 in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03644673 = score(doc=2074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 19:58:29
  8. Vechtomova, O.; Karamuftuoglu, M.: Lexical cohesion and term proximity in document ranking (2008) 0.00 
    0.0015186139 = product of:
  0.012148911 = sum of:
    0.012148911 = product of:
      0.03644673 = sum of:
        0.03644673 = weight(_text_:29 in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03644673 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:29:05
  9. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.00 
    0.0015049529 = product of:
  0.012039623 = sum of:
    0.012039623 = product of:
      0.03611887 = sum of:
        0.03611887 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03611887 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  10. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.00 
    0.0015049529 = product of:
  0.012039623 = sum of:
    0.012039623 = product of:
      0.03611887 = sum of:
        0.03611887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03611887 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  11. Otterbacher, J.; Erkan, G.; Radev, D.R.: Biased LexRank : passage retrieval using random walks with question-based priors (2009) 0.00 
    0.0013287871 = product of:
  0.010630297 = sum of:
    0.010630297 = product of:
      0.031890888 = sum of:
        0.031890888 = weight(_text_:29 in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031890888 = score(doc=2450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22.11.2008 17:11:29
  12. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.00 
    0.0013168338 = product of:
  0.01053467 = sum of:
    0.01053467 = product of:
      0.03160401 = sum of:
        0.03160401 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160401 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  13. Cannane, A.; Williams, H.E.: General-purpose compression for efficient retrieval (2001) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 5705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=5705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5705)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 13:59:55
  14. Kaszkiel, M.; Zobel, J.: Effective ranking with arbitrary passages (2001) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 5764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=5764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5764)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:00:39
  15. Bodoff, D.; Enache, D.; Kambil, A.; Simon, G.; Yukhimets, A.: ¬A unified maximum likelihood approach to document retrieval (2001) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 17:52:51
  16. Drucker, H.; Shahrary, B.; Gibbon, D.C.: Support vector machines : relevance feedback and information retrieval (2002) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 2581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=2581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2581)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    15. 8.2004 18:55:29
  17. Käki, M.: fKWIC: frequency-based Keyword-in-Context Index for filtering Web search results (2006) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=6112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Enormous Web search engine databases combined with short search queries result in large result sets that are often difficult to access. Result ranking works fairly well, but users need help when it fails. For these situations, we propose a filtering interface that is inspired by keyword-in-context (KWIC) indices. The user interface lists the most frequent keyword contexts (fKWIC). When a context is selected, the corresponding results are displayed in the result list, allowing users to concentrate on the specific context. We compared the keyword context index user interface to the rank order result listing in an experiment with 36 participants. The results show that the proposed user interface was 29% faster in finding relevant results, and the precision of the selected results was 19% higher. In addition, participants showed positive attitudes toward the system.
  18. Kekäläinen, J.: Binary and graded relevance in IR evaluations : comparison of the effects on ranking of IR systems (2005) 0.00 
    0.0011389605 = product of:
  0.009111684 = sum of:
    0.009111684 = product of:
      0.02733505 = sum of:
        0.02733505 = weight(_text_:29 in 1036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733505 = score(doc=1036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1036)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    26.12.2007 20:29:18
  19. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.00 
    0.0011287146 = product of:
  0.009029717 = sum of:
    0.009029717 = product of:
      0.02708915 = sum of:
        0.02708915 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02708915 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36
  20. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.00 
    0.0011287146 = product of:
  0.009029717 = sum of:
    0.009029717 = product of:
      0.02708915 = sum of:
        0.02708915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02708915 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06

Authors

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 4
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Themes