Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Lee, J.; Min, J.-K.; Oh, A.; Chung, C.-W.: Effective ranking and search techniques for Web resources considering semantic relationships (2014) 0.06
    0.060883917 = product of:
      0.09132587 = sum of:
        0.075279765 = weight(_text_:resources in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075279765 = score(doc=2670,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.40330917 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
        0.016046109 = product of:
          0.032092217 = sum of:
            0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032092217 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    On the Semantic Web, the types of resources and the semantic relationships between resources are defined in an ontology. By using that information, the accuracy of information retrieval can be improved. In this paper, we present effective ranking and search techniques considering the semantic relationships in an ontology. Our technique retrieves top-k resources which are the most relevant to query keywords through the semantic relationships. To do this, we propose a weighting measure for the semantic relationship. Based on this measure, we propose a novel ranking method which considers the number of meaningful semantic relationships between a resource and keywords as well as the coverage and discriminating power of keywords. In order to improve the efficiency of the search, we prune the unnecessary search space using the length and weight thresholds of the semantic relationship path. In addition, we exploit Threshold Algorithm based on an extended inverted index to answer top-k results efficiently. The experimental results using real data sets demonstrate that our retrieval method using the semantic information generates accurate results efficiently compared to the traditional methods.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.1, S.132-155
  2. Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012) 0.03
    0.030074967 = product of:
      0.0902249 = sum of:
        0.0902249 = sum of:
          0.055585355 = weight(_text_:management in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055585355 = score(doc=241,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    We address how individuals' (workers) knowledge needs influence the design of knowledge management systems (KMS), enabling knowledge creation and utilization. It is evident that KMS technologies and activities are indiscriminately deployed in most organizations with little regard to the actual context of their adoption. Moreover, it is apparent that the extant literature pertaining to knowledge management projects is frequently deficient in identifying the variety of factors indicative for successful KMS. This presents an obvious business practice and research gap that requires a critical analysis of the necessary intervention that will actually improve how workers can leverage and form organization-wide knowledge. This research involved an extensive review of the literature, a grounded theory methodological approach and rigorous data collection and synthesis through an empirical case analysis (Parsons Brinckerhoff and Samsung). The contribution of this study is the formulation of a model for designing KMS based upon the design science paradigm, which aspires to create artifacts that are interdependent of people and organizations. The essential proposition is that KMS design and implementation must be contextualized in relation to knowledge needs and that these will differ for various organizational settings. The findings present valuable insights and further understanding of the way in which KMS design efforts should be focused.
    Date
    11. 6.2012 14:22:34
  3. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.03
    0.027026644 = product of:
      0.08107993 = sum of:
        0.08107993 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.048987713 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048987713 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.700-714
  4. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.009237211 = product of:
      0.027711634 = sum of:
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  5. Jindal, V.; Bawa, S.; Batra, S.: ¬A review of ranking approaches for semantic search on Web (2014) 0.01
    0.0064184438 = product of:
      0.01925533 = sum of:
        0.01925533 = product of:
          0.03851066 = sum of:
            0.03851066 = weight(_text_:management in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851066 = score(doc=2799,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.2, S.416-425
  6. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.01
    0.0057732575 = product of:
      0.017319772 = sum of:
        0.017319772 = product of:
          0.034639545 = sum of:
            0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034639545 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
  7. Liu, X.; Zheng, W.; Fang, H.: ¬An exploration of ranking models and feedback method for related entity finding (2013) 0.01
    0.005348703 = product of:
      0.016046109 = sum of:
        0.016046109 = product of:
          0.032092217 = sum of:
            0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 2714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032092217 = score(doc=2714,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2714, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2714)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.5, S.995-1007
  8. Karisani, P.; Rahgozar, M.; Oroumchian, F.: Transforming LSA space dimensions into a rubric for an automatic assessment and feedback system (2016) 0.01
    0.005348703 = product of:
      0.016046109 = sum of:
        0.016046109 = product of:
          0.032092217 = sum of:
            0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 2970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032092217 = score(doc=2970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.3, S.478-489
  9. Hubert, G.; Pitarch, Y.; Pinel-Sauvagnat, K.; Tournier, R.; Laporte, L.: TournaRank : when retrieval becomes document competition (2018) 0.01
    0.005348703 = product of:
      0.016046109 = sum of:
        0.016046109 = product of:
          0.032092217 = sum of:
            0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032092217 = score(doc=5087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.2, S.252-272
  10. Dadashkarimia, J.; Shakery, A.; Failia, H.; Zamani, H.: ¬An expectation-maximization algorithm for query translation based on pseudo-relevant documents (2017) 0.00
    0.0042789625 = product of:
      0.0128368875 = sum of:
        0.0128368875 = product of:
          0.025673775 = sum of:
            0.025673775 = weight(_text_:management in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025673775 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 53(2017) no.2, S.371-387