Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rswk_00%3a%22Naturwissenschaften %2f kritik%22 5

Oberhauser, O.: Relevance Ranking in den Online-Katalogen der "nächsten Generation" (2010) 0.02
```
0.020914737 = product of:
  0.06274421 = sum of:
    0.06274421 = product of:
      0.12548842 = sum of:
        0.12548842 = weight(_text_:kritik in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12548842 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29538116 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.42483553 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen ist zwar kein neues Thema, doch liegt dazu nicht allzu viel Literatur vor, die das Prädikat "ernstzunehmen" verdient. Dies ist zum einen darin begründet, dass das Interesse an der Ausgabe ranggereihter Ergebnislisten auf Seiten aller Beteiligter (Bibliothekare, Softwarehersteller, Benutzer) traditionell gering war. Zum anderen ging die seit einigen Jahren populär gewordene Kritik an den bestehenden OPACs vielfach von einer unzureichenden Wissensbasis aus und produzierte oft nur polemische oder emotional gefärbte Beiträge, die zum Thema Ranking wenig beitrugen. ... Der hier beschriebene Test ist natürlich in keiner Weise erschöpfend oder repräsentativ. Dennoch gibt er, wie ich glaube, Anlass zu einiger Hoffnung. Er lässt vermuten, dass die "neuen" OPACs - zumindest was das Relevance Ranking betrifft - auf dem Weg in die richtige Richtung sind. Wie gut es wirklich gelingen wird, die Rankingleistung von Suchmaschinen wie Google, die unter völlig anderen Voraussetzungen arbeiten, einzuholen, wird aber erst die Zukunft zeigen.

Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01

0.0083262995 = product of:
  0.024978898 = sum of:
    0.024978898 = product of:
      0.049957797 = sum of:
        0.049957797 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049957797 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 22. 8.2014 17:05:18

Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.01

0.007359478 = product of:
  0.022078434 = sum of:
    0.022078434 = product of:
      0.044156868 = sum of:
        0.044156868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044156868 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56

Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012) 0.01

0.005203937 = product of:
  0.015611812 = sum of:
    0.015611812 = product of:
      0.031223623 = sum of:
        0.031223623 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031223623 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 11. 6.2012 14:22:34

Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.01

0.005203937 = product of:
  0.015611812 = sum of:
    0.015611812 = product of:
      0.031223623 = sum of:
        0.031223623 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031223623 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16140361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046091225 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 22. 3.2013 19:34:49

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Languages

Themes