-
Bauckhage, C.: Marginalizing over the PageRank damping factor (2014)
0.01
0.005271704 = product of:
0.010543408 = sum of:
0.010543408 = product of:
0.021086816 = sum of:
0.021086816 = weight(_text_:d in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021086816 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Lewandowski, D.: How can library materials be ranked in the OPAC? (2009)
0.00
0.002635852 = product of:
0.005271704 = sum of:
0.005271704 = product of:
0.010543408 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Austin, D.: How Google finds your needle in the Web's haystack : as we'll see, the trick is to ask the web itself to rank the importance of pages... (2006)
0.00
0.0018450962 = product of:
0.0036901925 = sum of:
0.0036901925 = product of:
0.007380385 = sum of:
0.007380385 = weight(_text_:d in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007380385 = score(doc=93,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)