Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.05
    0.04742858 = product of:
      0.09485716 = sum of:
        0.07665128 = weight(_text_:engines in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07665128 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
        0.018205874 = product of:
          0.036411747 = sum of:
            0.036411747 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036411747 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  2. Berry, M.W.; Browne, M.: Understanding search engines : mathematical modeling and text retrieval (1999) 0.04
    0.03832564 = product of:
      0.15330257 = sum of:
        0.15330257 = weight(_text_:engines in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15330257 = score(doc=5777,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.67362815 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book discusses many of the key design issues for building search engines and emphazises the important role that applied mathematics can play in improving information retrieval. The authors discuss not only important data structures, algorithms, and software but also user-centered issues such as interfaces, manual indexing, and document preparation. They also present some of the current problems in information retrieval that many not be familiar to applied mathematicians and computer scientists and some of the driving computational methods (SVD, SDD) for automated conceptual indexing
    LCSH
    Web search engines
    Subject
    Web search engines
  3. Smith, M.; Smith, M.P.; Wade, S.J.: Applying genetic programming to the problem of term weight algorithms (1995) 0.04
    0.0368329 = product of:
      0.1473316 = sum of:
        0.1473316 = product of:
          0.2946632 = sum of:
            0.2946632 = weight(_text_:programming in 5803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2946632 = score(doc=5803,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.29361802 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                1.0035596 = fieldWeight in 5803, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5803)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the results of an initial study on the application of Genetic Programming (GP) to the production of term weighting algorithms in relevance feedback systems within information retrieval systems. Compares Porter, wpq and GP algorithms with user rankings. Offers a backgroud to term weighting alsgorithms and Genetic Programming
  4. Courtois, M.P.; Berry, M.W.: Results ranking in Web search engines (1999) 0.03
    0.031938035 = product of:
      0.12775214 = sum of:
        0.12775214 = weight(_text_:engines in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12775214 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.5613568 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Evans, R.: Beyond Boolean : relevance ranking, natural language and the new search paradigm (1994) 0.03
    0.027100323 = product of:
      0.10840129 = sum of:
        0.10840129 = weight(_text_:engines in 8578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10840129 = score(doc=8578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.47632706 = fieldWeight in 8578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8578)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    New full-text search engines that employ relevance ranking have become available online services. These software tools provide increased ease of use by making natural language queries possible, and deliver superior recall. Even inexperienced end users can execute searchers with good results. For experienced database searchers, the ranked search engines offer a technology that is complementary to structured Boolean strategy, not necessarily a replacement. Even traditional Boolean queries become useful when the results are ranked by probable relevance, such ranking can free users from overwhelming output. Relevance ranking also permits the use of statistical inference methods to find related terms. using such tools to their best advantage requires rethinking some basic techniques, such as progressively narrowing queries until the retrieved set is small enough. users should broaden their search to maximize recall, then browse retrieved documents or pare the set down from the top
  6. Tenopir, C.: Online databases : natural language searching with WIN (1993) 0.03
    0.025550429 = product of:
      0.102201715 = sum of:
        0.102201715 = weight(_text_:engines in 7038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102201715 = score(doc=7038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.44908544 = fieldWeight in 7038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7038)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    WESTLAW is one of the first major commercial online systems to embrace both natural language input and partial match searching. Provides a backgroud to WESTLAW. Explains how the WESTLAW Is Natural (WIN) search engine works. Some searchers find that when searching with commands and Boolean logic, results differ drastically from those produces by searching with WIN. Discusses exact match Boolean logic search engines
  7. O'Leary, M.: DIALOG TARGET's new age searching (1993) 0.03
    0.025550429 = product of:
      0.102201715 = sum of:
        0.102201715 = weight(_text_:engines in 7951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102201715 = score(doc=7951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.44908544 = fieldWeight in 7951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7951)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance search engines, which measure the occurrence of search terms in a group of retrieved records and rank them accordingly, often produce better results than refined Boolean searches. Relevance searching has emerged from the research stage to be on the verge of becoming the standard retrieval method. Describes and evaluates the operation of DIALOG's TARGET, a major accomplishment, despite some rough edges
  8. Brenner, E.H.: Beyond Boolean : new approaches in information retrieval; the quest for intuitive online search systems past, present & future (1995) 0.02
    0.022356624 = product of:
      0.089426495 = sum of:
        0.089426495 = weight(_text_:engines in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089426495 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    (1) The Boolean world; (2) The Non-Boolean picture; (3) The commercial search engines: Personal Librarian, CLARIT, ConQuest, DR-LINK, InQuizit, InTEXT, TOPIC, WIN, TARGET, FREESTYLE, InfoSeek; (4) Wiedergabe von 8 Aufsätzen aus 'Monitor'
  9. Paris, L.A.H.; Tibbo, H.R.: Freestyle vs. Boolean : a comparison of partial and exact match retrieval systems (1998) 0.02
    0.022356624 = product of:
      0.089426495 = sum of:
        0.089426495 = weight(_text_:engines in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089426495 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Compares the performance of partial match options, LEXIS/NEXIS's Freestyle, with that of traditional Boolean retrieval. Defines natural language and the natural language search engines currently available. Although the Boolean searches had better results more often than the Freestyle searches, neither mechanism demonstrated superior performance for every query. These results do not in any way prove the superiority of partial match techniques or exact match techniques, but they do suggest that different queries demand different techniques. Further study and analysis are needed to determine which elements of a query make it best suited for partial match or exact match retrieval
  10. Davis, C.H.; McKim, G.W.: Systematic weighting and ranking : cutting the Gordian knot (1999) 0.02
    0.022356624 = product of:
      0.089426495 = sum of:
        0.089426495 = weight(_text_:engines in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089426495 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A powers-of-two algorithm is described that automatically creates discrete, well-defined, and unique result sets, displaying them in decreasing order of likely relevance. All computations are transparent, and a simple query form allows the searcher to focus on the choice of terms and their sequence - an implicit indicator of their relative importance. The program can be used with traditional databases or with search engines designed for the WWW. It also can be used with an intelligent agent to search the Web with a pushdown store, returning only those items that best reflect the searcher's stated interests
  11. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01
    0.0060686246 = product of:
      0.024274498 = sum of:
        0.024274498 = product of:
          0.048548996 = sum of:
            0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048548996 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  12. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.0053100465 = product of:
      0.021240186 = sum of:
        0.021240186 = product of:
          0.042480372 = sum of:
            0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042480372 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  13. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.00
    0.0045514684 = product of:
      0.018205874 = sum of:
        0.018205874 = product of:
          0.036411747 = sum of:
            0.036411747 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036411747 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  14. Burgin, R.: ¬The retrieval effectiveness of 5 clustering algorithms as a function of indexing exhaustivity (1995) 0.00
    0.0037928906 = product of:
      0.015171562 = sum of:
        0.015171562 = product of:
          0.030343125 = sum of:
            0.030343125 = weight(_text_:22 in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030343125 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 11:20:06
  15. Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995) 0.00
    0.0037928906 = product of:
      0.015171562 = sum of:
        0.015171562 = product of:
          0.030343125 = sum of:
            0.030343125 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030343125 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10