Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.02 
    0.024244212 = product of:
  0.048488423 = sum of:
    0.048488423 = product of:
      0.072732635 = sum of:
        0.042072058 = weight(_text_:c in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042072058 = score(doc=56,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
        0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030660577 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
  2. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.02 
    0.024164006 = product of:
  0.048328012 = sum of:
    0.048328012 = product of:
      0.07249202 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
  3. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.02 
    0.021510338 = product of:
  0.043020677 = sum of:
    0.043020677 = product of:
      0.06453101 = sum of:
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
        0.042924806 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042924806 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.87-92
  4. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.02 
    0.018437434 = product of:
  0.036874868 = sum of:
    0.036874868 = product of:
      0.0553123 = sum of:
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  5. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.01 
    0.014308269 = product of:
  0.028616538 = sum of:
    0.028616538 = product of:
      0.08584961 = sum of:
        0.08584961 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08584961 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  6. Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001) 0.01 
    0.013883069 = product of:
  0.027766138 = sum of:
    0.027766138 = product of:
      0.083298415 = sum of:
        0.083298415 = weight(_text_:c in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083298415 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01 
    0.0081761535 = product of:
  0.016352307 = sum of:
    0.016352307 = product of:
      0.04905692 = sum of:
        0.04905692 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04905692 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  8. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01 
    0.0081761535 = product of:
  0.016352307 = sum of:
    0.016352307 = product of:
      0.04905692 = sum of:
        0.04905692 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04905692 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  9. Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis : ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005 (2006) 0.01 
    0.0076673417 = product of:
  0.0153346835 = sum of:
    0.0153346835 = product of:
      0.023002025 = sum of:
        0.016828822 = weight(_text_:c in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016828822 = score(doc=5973,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.10779391 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
        0.0061732023 = weight(_text_:h in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061732023 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.05489909 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Mandl, T. u. C. Womser-Hacker
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 57(2006) H.5, S.290-291 (C. Schindler): "Weniger als ein Jahr nach dem "Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop" (HIER 2005) im Juli 2005 ist der dazugehörige Tagungsband erschienen. Eingeladen hatte die Hildesheimer Informationswissenschaft um ihre Forschungsergebnisse und die einiger externer Experten zum Thema Information Retrieval einem Fachpublikum zu präsentieren und zur Diskussion zu stellen. Unter dem Titel "Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis" sind nahezu sämtliche Beiträge des Workshops in dem nun erschienenen, 15 Beiträge umfassenden Band gesammelt. Mit dem Schwerpunkt Information Retrieval (IR) wird ein Teilgebiet der Informationswissenschaft vorgestellt, das schon immer im Zentrum informationswissenschaftlicher Forschung steht. Ob durch den Leistungsanstieg von Prozessoren und Speichermedien, durch die Verbreitung des Internet über nationale Grenzen hinweg oder durch den stetigen Anstieg der Wissensproduktion, festzuhalten ist, dass in einer zunehmend wechselseitig vernetzten Welt die Orientierung und das Auffinden von Dokumenten in großen Wissensbeständen zu einer zentralen Herausforderung geworden sind. Aktuelle Verfahrensweisen zu diesem Thema, dem Information Retrieval, präsentiert der neue Band anhand von praxisbezogenen Projekten und theoretischen Diskussionen. Das Kernthema Information Retrieval wird in dem Sammelband in die Bereiche Retrieval-Systeme, Digitale Bibliothek, Evaluierung und Multilinguale Systeme untergliedert. Die Artikel der einzelnen Sektionen sind insgesamt recht heterogen und bieten daher keine Überschneidungen inhaltlicher Art. Jedoch ist eine vollkommene thematische Abdeckung der unterschiedlichen Bereiche ebenfalls nicht gegeben, was bei der Präsentation von Forschungsergebnissen eines Institutes und seiner Kooperationspartner auch nur bedingt erwartet werden kann. So lässt sich sowohl in der Gliederung als auch in den einzelnen Beiträgen eine thematische Verdichtung erkennen, die das spezielle Profil und die Besonderheit der Hildesheimer Informationswissenschaft im Feld des Information Retrieval wiedergibt. Teil davon ist die mehrsprachige und interdisziplinäre Ausrichtung, die die Schnittstellen zwischen Informationswissenschaft, Sprachwissenschaft und Informatik in ihrer praxisbezogenen und internationalen Forschung fokussiert.
  10. Dreßler, H.: Fuzzy Information Retrieval (2008) 0.01 
    0.0072751893 = product of:
  0.014550379 = sum of:
    0.014550379 = product of:
      0.043651134 = sum of:
        0.043651134 = weight(_text_:h in 2300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043651134 = score(doc=2300,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 2300, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2300)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.6/7, S.351-352
  11. Cheng, C.-S.; Chung, C.-P.; Shann, J.J.-J.: Fast query evaluation through document identifier assignment for inverted file-based information retrieval systems (2006) 0.01 
    0.0070120096 = product of:
  0.014024019 = sum of:
    0.014024019 = product of:
      0.042072058 = sum of:
        0.042072058 = weight(_text_:c in 979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042072058 = score(doc=979,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 979, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=979)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Boughanem, M.; Chrisment, C.; Tamine, L.: On using genetic algorithms for multimodal relevance optimization in information retrieval (2002) 0.01 
    0.0069415346 = product of:
  0.013883069 = sum of:
    0.013883069 = product of:
      0.041649207 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: Probabilistic information retrieval model for a dependence structured indexing system (2005) 0.01 
    0.0069415346 = product of:
  0.013883069 = sum of:
    0.013883069 = product of:
      0.041649207 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=1004,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. López-Pujalte, C.; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya-Anegón, F. de: Genetic algorithms in relevance feedback : a second test and new contributions (2003) 0.01 
    0.0069415346 = product of:
  0.013883069 = sum of:
    0.013883069 = product of:
      0.041649207 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008) 0.01 
    0.0063004987 = product of:
  0.012600997 = sum of:
    0.012600997 = product of:
      0.03780299 = sum of:
        0.03780299 = weight(_text_:h in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03780299 = score(doc=5586,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3361869 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on the practical limitations in the content and software of the databases that are used to calculate the h-index for assessing the publishing productivity and impact of researchers. To celebrate F. W. Lancaster's biological age of seventy-five, and "scientific age" of forty-five, this paper discusses the related features of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), and demonstrates in the latter how a much more realistic and fair h-index can be computed for F. W. Lancaster than the one produced automatically. Browsing and searching the cited reference index of the 1945-2007 edition of WoS, which in my estimate has over a hundred million "orphan references" that have no counterpart master records to be attached to, and "stray references" that cite papers which do have master records but cannot be identified by the matching algorithm because of errors of omission and commission in the references of the citing works, can bring up hundreds of additional cited references given to works of an accomplished author but are ignored in the automatic process of calculating the h-index. The partially manual process doubled the h-index value for F. W. Lancaster from 13 to 26, which is a much more realistic value for an information scientist and professor of his stature.
    Object
    h-index
  16. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.01 
    0.0061321156 = product of:
  0.012264231 = sum of:
    0.012264231 = product of:
      0.03679269 = sum of:
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36
  17. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.01 
    0.0061321156 = product of:
  0.012264231 = sum of:
    0.012264231 = product of:
      0.03679269 = sum of:
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
  18. Witschel, H.F.: Global term weights in distributed environments (2008) 0.01 
    0.0061321156 = product of:
  0.012264231 = sum of:
    0.012264231 = product of:
      0.03679269 = sum of:
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.2008 9:44:22
  19. Campos, L.M. de; Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.: Implementing relevance feedback in the Bayesian network retrieval model (2003) 0.01 
    0.0061321156 = product of:
  0.012264231 = sum of:
    0.012264231 = product of:
      0.03679269 = sum of:
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:30:19
  20. Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.; Foo, S.: Organsising keywords in a Web search environment : a methodology based on co-word analysis (2000) 0.01 
    0.0059498874 = product of:
  0.011899775 = sum of:
    0.011899775 = product of:
      0.035699323 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al

Authors

Languages

  • e 38
  • d 11
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 45
  • m 4
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications