Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

0.0789346 = product of:
  0.1973365 = sum of:
    0.17547186 = weight(_text_:s.e in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17547186 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28300875 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.6200227 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
    0.021864641 = product of:
      0.043729283 = sum of:
        0.043729283 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043729283 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14128053 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040344775 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

20. 1.2007 18:30:22

0.026320776 = product of:
  0.13160388 = sum of:
    0.13160388 = weight(_text_:s.e in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13160388 = score(doc=651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28300875 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.46501702 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.026029367 = product of:
  0.13014683 = sum of:
    0.13014683 = product of:
      0.26029366 = sum of:
        0.26029366 = weight(_text_:ray in 5705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26029366 = score(doc=5705,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33468774 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040344775 = queryNorm
            0.7777209 = fieldWeight in 5705, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5705)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Compression of databases not only reduces space requirements but can also reduce overall retrieval times. In text databases, compression of documents based on semistatic modeling with words has been shown to be both practical and fast. Similarly, for specific applications -such as databases of integers or scientific databases-specially designed semistatic compression schemes work well. We propose a scheme for general-purpose compression that can be applied to all types of data stored in large collections. We describe our approach -which we call RAY-in detail, and show experimentally the compression available, compression and decompression costs, and performance as a stream and random-access technique. We show that, in many cases, RAY achieves better compression than an efficient Huffman scheme and popular adaptive compression techniques, and that it can be used as an efficient general-purpose compression scheme

0.022780998 = product of:
  0.05695249 = sum of:
    0.04055401 = weight(_text_:u in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04055401 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
    0.01639848 = product of:
      0.03279696 = sum of:
        0.03279696 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03279696 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14128053 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040344775 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

16.11.2008 16:22:48

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.022136265 = product of:
  0.110681325 = sum of:
    0.110681325 = weight(_text_:t in 3907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110681325 = score(doc=3907,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15893455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.69639564 = fieldWeight in 3907, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3907)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.021933982 = product of:
  0.10966991 = sum of:
    0.10966991 = weight(_text_:s.e in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10966991 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28300875 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.3875142 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.019369232 = product of:
  0.096846156 = sum of:
    0.096846156 = weight(_text_:t in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096846156 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15893455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.015024832 = product of:
  0.03756208 = sum of:
    0.02389668 = weight(_text_:u in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02389668 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    0.0136654 = product of:
      0.0273308 = sum of:
        0.0273308 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0273308 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14128053 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040344775 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

22. 3.2003 19:35:46

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.015024832 = product of:
  0.03756208 = sum of:
    0.02389668 = weight(_text_:u in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02389668 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
    0.0136654 = product of:
      0.0273308 = sum of:
        0.0273308 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0273308 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14128053 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040344775 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

22. 7.2006 16:32:43

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.011068133 = product of:
  0.055340663 = sum of:
    0.055340663 = weight(_text_:t in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055340663 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15893455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.009782939 = product of:
  0.048914697 = sum of:
    0.048914697 = weight(_text_:t in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048914697 = score(doc=5169,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15893455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Ruthven, Mounia, and van Rijsbergen rank and select terms for query expansion using information gathered on searcher evaluation behavior. Using the TREC Financial Times and Los Angeles Times collections and search topics from TREC-6 placed in simulated work situations, six student subjects each preformed three searches on an experimental system and three on a control system with instructions to search by natural language expression in any way they found comfortable. Searching was analyzed for behavior differences between experimental and control situations, and for effectiveness and perceptions. In three experiments paired t-tests were the analysis tool with controls being a no relevance feedback system, a standard ranking for automatic expansion system, and a standard ranking for interactive expansion while the experimental systems based ranking upon user information on temporal relevance and partial relevance. Two further experiments compare using user behavior (number assessed relevant and similarity of relevant documents) to choose a query expansion technique against a non-selective technique and finally the effect of providing the user with knowledge of the process. When partial relevance data and time of assessment data are incorporated in term ranking more relevant documents were recovered in fewer iterations, however retrieval effectiveness overall was not improved. The subjects, none-the-less, rated the suggested terms as more useful and used them more heavily. Explanations of what the feedback techniques were doing led to higher use of the techniques.

0.009357535 = product of:
  0.023393838 = sum of:
    0.009558672 = weight(_text_:u in 5965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009558672 = score(doc=5965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 5965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5965)
    0.013835166 = weight(_text_:t in 5965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013835166 = score(doc=5965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15893455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.087049454 = fieldWeight in 5965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5965)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Footnote

Rez. in: nfd - Information 54(2003) H.6, S.379-380 (U. Thiel): "Kannte G. Salton bei der Entwicklung des Vektorraummodells die kybernetisch orientierten Versuche mit assoziativen Speicherstrukturen? An diese und ähnliche Vermutungen, die ich vor einigen Jahren mit Reginald Ferber und anderen Kollegen diskutierte, erinnerte mich die Thematik des vorliegenden Buches. Immerhin lässt sich feststellen, dass die Vektorrepräsentation eine genial einfache Darstellung sowohl der im Information Retrieval (IR) als grundlegende Datenstruktur benutzten "inverted files" als auch der assoziativen Speichermatrizen darstellt, die sich im Laufe der Zeit Über Perzeptrons zu Neuronalen Netzen (NN) weiterentwickelten. Dieser formale Zusammenhang stimulierte in der Folge eine Reihe von Ansätzen, die Netzwerke im Retrieval zu verwenden, wobei sich, wie auch im vorliegenden Band, hybride Ansätze, die Methoden aus beiden Disziplinen kombinieren, als sehr geeignet erweisen. Aber der Reihe nach... Das Buch wurde vom Autor als Dissertation beim Fachbereich IV "Sprachen und Technik" der Universität Hildesheim eingereicht und resultiert aus einer Folge von Forschungsbeiträgen zu mehreren Projekten, an denen der Autor in der Zeit von 1995 bis 2000 an verschiedenen Standorten beteiligt war. Dies erklärt die ungewohnte Breite der Anwendungen, Szenarien und Domänen, in denen die Ergebnisse gewonnen wurden. So wird das in der Arbeit entwickelte COSIMIR Modell (COgnitive SIMilarity learning in Information Retrieval) nicht nur anhand der klassischen Cranfield-Kollektion evaluiert, sondern auch im WING-Projekt der Universität Regensburg im Faktenretrieval aus einer Werkstoffdatenbank eingesetzt. Weitere Versuche mit der als "Transformations-Netzwerk" bezeichneten Komponente, deren Aufgabe die Abbildung von Gewichtungsfunktionen zwischen zwei Termräumen ist, runden das Spektrum der Experimente ab. Aber nicht nur die vorgestellten Resultate sind vielfältig, auch der dem Leser angebotene "State-of-the-Art"-Überblick fasst in hoch informativer Breite Wesentliches aus den Gebieten IR und NN zusammen und beleuchtet die Schnittpunkte der beiden Bereiche. So werden neben den Grundlagen des Text- und Faktenretrieval die Ansätze zur Verbesserung der Adaptivität und zur Beherrschung von Heterogenität vorgestellt, während als Grundlagen Neuronaler Netze neben einer allgemeinen Einführung in die Grundbegriffe u.a. das Backpropagation-Modell, KohonenNetze und die Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) geschildert werden. Einweiteres Kapitel stellt die bisherigen NN-orientierten Ansätze im IR vor und rundet den Abriss der relevanten Forschungslandschaft ab. Als Vorbereitung der Präsentation des COSIMIR-Modells schiebt der Autor an dieser Stelle ein diskursives Kapitel zum Thema Heterogenität im IR ein, wodurch die Ziele und Grundannahmen der Arbeit noch einmal reflektiert werden. Als Dimensionen der Heterogenität werden der Objekttyp, die Qualität der Objekte und ihrer Erschließung und die Mehrsprachigkeit genannt. Wenn auch diese Systematik im Wesentlichen die Akzente auf Probleme aus den hier tangierten Projekten legt, und weniger eine umfassende Aufbereitung z.B. der Literatur zum Problem der Relevanz anstrebt, ist sie dennoch hilfreich zum Verständnis der in den nachfolgenden Kapitel oft nur implizit angesprochenen Designentscheidungen bei der Konzeption der entwickelten Prototypen. Der Ansatz, Heterogenität durch Transformationen zu behandeln, wird im speziellen Kontext der NN konkretisiert, wobei andere Möglichkeiten, die z.B. Instrumente der Logik und Probabilistik einzusetzen, nur kurz diskutiert werden. Eine weitergehende Analyse hätte wohl auch den Rahmen der Arbeit zu weit gespannt,

0.009357535 = product of:
  0.023393838 = sum of:
    0.009558672 = weight(_text_:u in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009558672 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
    0.013835166 = weight(_text_:t in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013835166 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15893455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.087049454 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Editor

Mandl, T. u. C. Womser-Hacker

0.0083011 = product of:
  0.041505497 = sum of:
    0.041505497 = weight(_text_:t in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041505497 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15893455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.007652624 = product of:
  0.03826312 = sum of:
    0.03826312 = product of:
      0.07652624 = sum of:
        0.07652624 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07652624 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14128053 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040344775 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

25. 8.2005 17:42:22

0.007646938 = product of:
  0.03823469 = sum of:
    0.03823469 = weight(_text_:u in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03823469 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.00669107 = product of:
  0.03345535 = sum of:
    0.03345535 = weight(_text_:u in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03345535 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.005735203 = product of:
  0.028676014 = sum of:
    0.028676014 = weight(_text_:u in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028676014 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.004779336 = product of:
  0.02389668 = sum of:
    0.02389668 = weight(_text_:u in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02389668 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.004779336 = product of:
  0.02389668 = sum of:
    0.02389668 = weight(_text_:u in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02389668 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13210672 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040344775 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval