-
Mandl, T.: Web- und Multimedia-Dokumente : Neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen (2003)
0.03
0.030210808 = product of:
0.12084323 = sum of:
0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028013978 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.021417862 = weight(_text_:und in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021417862 = score(doc=1734,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.47985753 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028013978 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.015383439 = weight(_text_:der in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015383439 = score(doc=1734,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028013978 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- Die Menge an Daten im Internet steigt weiter rapide an. Damit wächst auch der Bedarf an qualitativ hochwertigen Information Retrieval Diensten zur Orientierung und problemorientierten Suche. Die Entscheidung für die Benutzung oder Beschaffung von Information Retrieval Software erfordert aussagekräftige Evaluierungsergebnisse. Dieser Beitrag stellt neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen vor und zeigt den Trend zu Spezialisierung und Diversifizierung von Evaluierungsstudien, die den Realitätsgrad derErgebnisse erhöhen. DerSchwerpunkt liegt auf dem Retrieval von Fachtexten, Internet-Seiten und Multimedia-Objekten.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.4, S.203-210
-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.03
0.027929602 = product of:
0.09309867 = sum of:
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.013251626 = weight(_text_:und in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013251626 = score(doc=3276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.0134605095 = weight(_text_:der in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0134605095 = score(doc=3276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.006366401 = product of:
0.019099202 = sum of:
0.019099202 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019099202 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des klassischen Information Retrieval wurden verschiedene Verfahren für das Ranking sowie die Suche in einer homogenen strukturlosen Dokumentenmenge entwickelt. Die Erfolge der Suchmaschine Google haben gezeigt dass die Suche in einer zwar inhomogenen aber zusammenhängenden Dokumentenmenge wie dem Internet unter Berücksichtigung der Dokumentenverbindungen (Links) sehr effektiv sein kann. Unter den von der Suchmaschine Google realisierten Konzepten ist ein Verfahren zum Ranking von Suchergebnissen (PageRank), das in diesem Artikel kurz erklärt wird. Darüber hinaus wird auf die Konzepte eines Systems namens CiteSeer eingegangen, welches automatisch bibliographische Angaben indexiert (engl. Autonomous Citation Indexing, ACI). Letzteres erzeugt aus einer Menge von nicht vernetzten wissenschaftlichen Dokumenten eine zusammenhängende Dokumentenmenge und ermöglicht den Einsatz von Banking-Verfahren, die auf den von Google genutzten Verfahren basieren.
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.87-92
-
Nagelschmidt, M.: Verfahren zur Anfragemodifikation im Information Retrieval (2008)
0.02
0.023312055 = product of:
0.09324822 = sum of:
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.020737756 = weight(_text_:und in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020737756 = score(doc=2774,freq=20.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.021064643 = weight(_text_:der in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021064643 = score(doc=2774,freq=20.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- Für das Modifizieren von Suchanfragen kennt das Information Retrieval vielfältige Möglichkeiten. Nach einer einleitenden Darstellung der Wechselwirkung zwischen Informationsbedarf und Suchanfrage wird eine konzeptuelle und typologische Annäherung an Verfahren zur Anfragemodifikation gegeben. Im Anschluss an eine kurze Charakterisierung des Fakten- und des Information Retrieval, sowie des Vektorraum- und des probabilistischen Modells, werden intellektuelle, automatische und interaktive Modifikationsverfahren vorgestellt. Neben klassischen intellektuellen Verfahren, wie der Blockstrategie und der "Citation Pearl Growing"-Strategie, umfasst die Darstellung der automatischen und interaktiven Verfahren Modifikationsmöglichkeiten auf den Ebenen der Morphologie, der Syntax und der Semantik von Suchtermen. Darüber hinaus werden das Relevance Feedback, der Nutzen informetrischer Analysen und die Idee eines assoziativen Retrievals auf der Basis von Clustering- und terminologischen Techniken, sowie zitationsanalytischen Verfahren verfolgt. Ein Eindruck für die praktischen Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der behandelten Verfahren soll abschließend durch fünf Anwendungsbeispiele vermittelt werden.
- Date
- 23. 2.2005 10:27:09
-
Archuby, C.G.: Interfaces se recuperacion para catalogos en linea con salidas ordenadas por probable relevancia (2000)
0.02
0.021042258 = product of:
0.10521129 = sum of:
0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028581016 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028581016 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028581016 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.019468237 = product of:
0.038936473 = sum of:
0.038936473 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038936473 = score(doc=5727,freq=4.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 18:23:13
- Source
- Ciencia da informacao. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-13
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.02
0.015174066 = product of:
0.07587033 = sum of:
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.007275887 = product of:
0.02182766 = sum of:
0.02182766 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02182766 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
-
Weinstein, A.: Hochprozentig : Tipps and tricks für ein Top-Ranking (2002)
0.01
0.012861458 = product of:
0.08574305 = sum of:
0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028581016 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028581016 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028581016 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 23. 8.2002 9:48:37
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006)
0.01
0.011414727 = product of:
0.057073634 = sum of:
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.0045474293 = product of:
0.013642288 = sum of:
0.013642288 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013642288 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:43
-
Berry, M.W.; Browne, M.: Understanding search engines : mathematical modeling and text retrieval (2005)
0.01
0.010917367 = product of:
0.07278245 = sum of:
0.024260817 = weight(_text_:software in 7) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024260817 = score(doc=7,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3036718 = fieldWeight in 7, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7)
0.024260817 = weight(_text_:software in 7) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024260817 = score(doc=7,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3036718 = fieldWeight in 7, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7)
0.024260817 = weight(_text_:software in 7) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024260817 = score(doc=7,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3036718 = fieldWeight in 7, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- The second edition of Understanding Search Engines: Mathematical Modeling and Text Retrieval follows the basic premise of the first edition by discussing many of the key design issues for building search engines and emphasizing the important role that applied mathematics can play in improving information retrieval. The authors discuss important data structures, algorithms, and software as well as user-centered issues such as interfaces, manual indexing, and document preparation. Significant changes bring the text up to date on current information retrieval methods: for example the addition of a new chapter on link-structure algorithms used in search engines such as Google. The chapter on user interface has been rewritten to specifically focus on search engine usability. In addition the authors have added new recommendations for further reading and expanded the bibliography, and have updated and streamlined the index to make it more reader friendly.
- Content
- Inhalt: Introduction Document File Preparation - Manual Indexing - Information Extraction - Vector Space Modeling - Matrix Decompositions - Query Representations - Ranking and Relevance Feedback - Searching by Link Structure - User Interface - Book Format Document File Preparation Document Purification and Analysis - Text Formatting - Validation - Manual Indexing - Automatic Indexing - Item Normalization - Inverted File Structures - Document File - Dictionary List - Inversion List - Other File Structures Vector Space Models Construction - Term-by-Document Matrices - Simple Query Matching - Design Issues - Term Weighting - Sparse Matrix Storage - Low-Rank Approximations Matrix Decompositions QR Factorization - Singular Value Decomposition - Low-Rank Approximations - Query Matching - Software - Semidiscrete Decomposition - Updating Techniques Query Management Query Binding - Types of Queries - Boolean Queries - Natural Language Queries - Thesaurus Queries - Fuzzy Queries - Term Searches - Probabilistic Queries Ranking and Relevance Feedback Performance Evaluation - Precision - Recall - Average Precision - Genetic Algorithms - Relevance Feedback Searching by Link Structure HITS Method - HITS Implementation - HITS Summary - PageRank Method - PageRank Adjustments - PageRank Implementation - PageRank Summary User Interface Considerations General Guidelines - Search Engine Interfaces - Form Fill-in - Display Considerations - Progress Indication - No Penalties for Error - Results - Test and Retest - Final Considerations Further Reading
- Series
- Software, environments, tools; 17
-
Mayr, P.: Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing für die verteilte Suche in Digitalen Bibliotheken (2009)
0.01
0.01060489 = product of:
0.07069927 = sum of:
0.03955271 = weight(_text_:monographien in 4302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03955271 = score(doc=4302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13425075 = queryWeight, product of:
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2946182 = fieldWeight in 4302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4302)
0.01576312 = weight(_text_:und in 4302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01576312 = score(doc=4302,freq=26.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3531656 = fieldWeight in 4302, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4302)
0.015383439 = weight(_text_:der in 4302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015383439 = score(doc=4302,freq=24.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 4302, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4302)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- Trotz großer Dokumentmengen für datenbankübergreifende Literaturrecherchen erwarten akademische Nutzer einen möglichst hohen Anteil an relevanten und qualitativen Dokumenten in den Trefferergebnissen. Insbesondere die Reihenfolge und Struktur der gelisteten Ergebnisse (Ranking) spielt, neben dem direkten Volltextzugriff auf die Dokumente, inzwischen eine entscheidende Rolle beim Design von Suchsystemen. Nutzer erwarten weiterhin flexible Informationssysteme, die es unter anderem zulassen, Einfluss auf das Ranking der Dokumente zu nehmen bzw. alternative Rankingverfahren zu verwenden. In dieser Arbeit werden zwei Mehrwertverfahren für Suchsysteme vorgestellt, die die typischen Probleme bei der Recherche nach wissenschaftlicher Literatur behandeln und damit die Recherchesituation messbar verbessern können. Die beiden Mehrwertdienste semantische Heterogenitätsbehandlung am Beispiel Crosskonkordanzen und Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing, die in unterschiedlichen Phasen der Suche zum Einsatz kommen, werden hier ausführlich beschrieben und im empirischen Teil der Arbeit bzgl. der Effektivität für typische fachbezogene Recherchen evaluiert. Vorrangiges Ziel der Promotion ist es, zu untersuchen, ob das hier vorgestellte alternative Re-Rankingverfahren Bradfordizing im Anwendungsbereich bibliographischer Datenbanken zum einen operabel ist und zum anderen voraussichtlich gewinnbringend in Informationssystemen eingesetzt und dem Nutzer angeboten werden kann. Für die Tests wurden Fragestellungen und Daten aus zwei Evaluationsprojekten (CLEF und KoMoHe) verwendet. Die intellektuell bewerteten Dokumente stammen aus insgesamt sieben wissenschaftlichen Fachdatenbanken der Fächer Sozialwissenschaften, Politikwissenschaft, Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Psychologie und Medizin. Die Evaluation der Crosskonkordanzen (insgesamt 82 Fragestellungen) zeigt, dass sich die Retrievalergebnisse signifikant für alle Crosskonkordanzen verbessern; es zeigt sich zudem, dass interdisziplinäre Crosskonkordanzen den stärksten (positiven) Effekt auf die Suchergebnisse haben. Die Evaluation des Re-Ranking nach Bradfordizing (insgesamt 164 Fragestellungen) zeigt, dass die Dokumente der Kernzone (Kernzeitschriften) für die meisten Testreihen eine signifikant höhere Precision als Dokumente der Zone 2 und Zone 3 (Peripheriezeitschriften) ergeben. Sowohl für Zeitschriften als auch für Monographien kann dieser Relevanzvorteil nach Bradfordizing auf einer sehr breiten Basis von Themen und Fragestellungen an zwei unabhängigen Dokumentkorpora empirisch nachgewiesen werden.
- Footnote
- Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) eingereicht an der Philosophischen Fakultät I
- Imprint
- Berlin : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin / Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
-
Computational information retrieval (2001)
0.01
0.009454718 = product of:
0.06303145 = sum of:
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- This volume contains selected papers that focus on the use of linear algebra, computational statistics, and computer science in the development of algorithms and software systems for text retrieval. Experts in information modeling and retrieval share their perspectives on the design of scalable but precise text retrieval systems, revealing many of the challenges and obstacles that mathematical and statistical models must overcome to be viable for automated text processing. This very useful proceedings is an excellent companion for courses in information retrieval, applied linear algebra, and applied statistics. Computational Information Retrieval provides background material on vector space models for text retrieval that applied mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists may not be familiar with. For graduate students in these areas, several research questions in information modeling are exposed. In addition, several case studies concerning the efficacy of the popular Latent Semantic Analysis (or Indexing) approach are provided.
-
Henzinger, M.R.: Link analysis in Web information retrieval (2000)
0.01
0.009428329 = product of:
0.04714164 = sum of:
0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0114324065 = score(doc=801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=801)
0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0114324065 = score(doc=801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=801)
0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0114324065 = score(doc=801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=801)
0.012844422 = product of:
0.025688844 = sum of:
0.025688844 = weight(_text_:engineering in 801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025688844 = score(doc=801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23743443 = fieldWeight in 801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=801)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Source
- IEEE data engineering bulletin. 23(2000) no.3, S.3-8
-
Schaefer, A.; Jordan, M.; Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.: Active support for query formulation in virtual digital libraries : a case study with DAFFODIL (2005)
0.01
0.009094424 = product of:
0.06062949 = sum of:
0.02020983 = weight(_text_:23 in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02020983 = score(doc=4296,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
0.02020983 = weight(_text_:23 in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02020983 = score(doc=4296,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
0.02020983 = weight(_text_:23 in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02020983 = score(doc=4296,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 16.11.2008 17:23:50
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 9th European conference, ECDL 2005, Vienna, Austria, September 18-23, 2005 ; proceedings / Andreas Rauber ... (eds.)
-
Klein, S.T.: On the use of negation in Boolean IR queries. (2009)
0.01
0.009003021 = product of:
0.060020134 = sum of:
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 23. 1.2011 13:59:51
-
Ning, X.; Jin, H.; Jia, W.; Yuan, P.: Practical and effective IR-style keyword search over semantic web (2009)
0.01
0.009003021 = product of:
0.060020134 = sum of:
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=4213,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4213, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4213)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=4213,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4213, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4213)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=4213,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4213, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4213)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 23. 1.2011 13:55:17
-
García Cumbreras, M.A.; Perea-Ortega, J.M.; García Vega, M.; Ureña López, L.A.: Information retrieval with geographical references : relevant documents filtering vs. query expansion (2009)
0.01
0.009003021 = product of:
0.060020134 = sum of:
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=4222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4222)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=4222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4222)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=4222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4222)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 23. 1.2011 14:19:08
-
Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008)
0.01
0.007878931 = product of:
0.052526206 = sum of:
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=5586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=5586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=5586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the practical limitations in the content and software of the databases that are used to calculate the h-index for assessing the publishing productivity and impact of researchers. To celebrate F. W. Lancaster's biological age of seventy-five, and "scientific age" of forty-five, this paper discusses the related features of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), and demonstrates in the latter how a much more realistic and fair h-index can be computed for F. W. Lancaster than the one produced automatically. Browsing and searching the cited reference index of the 1945-2007 edition of WoS, which in my estimate has over a hundred million "orphan references" that have no counterpart master records to be attached to, and "stray references" that cite papers which do have master records but cannot be identified by the matching algorithm because of errors of omission and commission in the references of the citing works, can bring up hundreds of additional cited references given to works of an accomplished author but are ignored in the automatic process of calculating the h-index. The partially manual process doubled the h-index value for F. W. Lancaster from 13 to 26, which is a much more realistic value for an information scientist and professor of his stature.
-
Nie, J.-Y.: Query expansion and query translation as logical inference (2003)
0.01
0.007716874 = product of:
0.051445827 = sum of:
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 23. 3.2003 8:33:49
-
Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003)
0.01
0.0064965123 = product of:
0.04331008 = sum of:
0.010819908 = weight(_text_:und in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010819908 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.021499714 = product of:
0.042999428 = sum of:
0.042999428 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042999428 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10581345 = queryWeight, product of:
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.40637016 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0109904595 = weight(_text_:der in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0109904595 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- Bekanntlich führen Suchmaschinen wie Google &Co. beider Auflistung der Suchergebnisse ein "Ranking" nach "Relevanz" durch, d.h. die Dokumente werden in absteigender Reihenfolge entsprechend ihrer Erfüllung von Relevanzkriterien ausgeben. In Online-Katalogen (OPACs) ist derlei noch nicht allgemein übliche Praxis, doch bietet etwa das im Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund eingesetzte System Aleph 500 tatsächlich eine solche Ranking-Option an (die im Verbundkatalog auch implementiert ist). Bislang liegen allerdings kaum Informationen zur Funktionsweise dieses Features, insbesondere auch im Hinblick auf eine Hilfestellung für Benutzer, vor. Daher möchten wir mit diesem Beitrag versuchen, den in unserem Verbund bestehenden Informationsstand zum Thema "Relevance Ranking" zu erweitern. Sowohl die Verwendung einer Ranking-Option in OPACs generell als auch die sich unter Aleph 500 konkret bietenden Möglichkeiten sollen im folgenden näher betrachtet werden.
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 56(2003) H.3/4, S.49-63
-
Picard, J.; Savoy, J.: Enhancing retrieval with hyperlinks : a general model based on propositional argumentation systems (2003)
0.01
0.006430729 = product of:
0.042871524 = sum of:
0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014290508 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014290508 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014290508 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 23. 3.2003 8:36:41
-
Ruthven, T.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, K.van: Incorporating user research behavior into relevance feedback (2003)
0.01
0.006430729 = product of:
0.042871524 = sum of:
0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014290508 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014290508 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014290508 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 8. 7.2006 14:47:23
