Search (34 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Jacucci, G.; Barral, O.; Daee, P.; Wenzel, M.; Serim, B.; Ruotsalo, T.; Pluchino, P.; Freeman, J.; Gamberini, L.; Kaski, S.; Blankertz, B.: Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval (2019) 0.00
    0.0042151418 = product of:
      0.0084302835 = sum of:
        0.0084302835 = product of:
          0.02529085 = sum of:
            0.02529085 = weight(_text_:j in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02529085 = score(doc=5356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013) 0.00
    0.004123085 = product of:
      0.00824617 = sum of:
        0.00824617 = product of:
          0.02473851 = sum of:
            0.02473851 = weight(_text_:h in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02473851 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 16(2013) H.3, S.190-200
  3. Behnert, C.; Borst, T.: Neue Formen der Relevanz-Sortierung in bibliothekarischen Informationssystemen : das DFG-Projekt LibRank (2015) 0.00
    0.004123085 = product of:
      0.00824617 = sum of:
        0.00824617 = product of:
          0.02473851 = sum of:
            0.02473851 = weight(_text_:h in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02473851 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 39(2015) H.3, S.384-393
  4. Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018) 0.00
    0.0036076994 = product of:
      0.007215399 = sum of:
        0.007215399 = product of:
          0.021646196 = sum of:
            0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021646196 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Perspektive Bibliothek. 7(2018) H.2, S.2-23
  5. Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019) 0.00
    0.0036076994 = product of:
      0.007215399 = sum of:
        0.007215399 = product of:
          0.021646196 = sum of:
            0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021646196 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 70(2019) H.1, S.14-23
  6. Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing als Re-Ranking-Ansatz in Literaturinformationssystemen (2011) 0.00
    0.0030923137 = product of:
      0.0061846273 = sum of:
        0.0061846273 = product of:
          0.018553881 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.1, S.3-10
  7. Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing mit Katalogdaten : Alternative Sicht auf Suchergebnisse und Publikationsquellen durch Re-Ranking (2010) 0.00
    0.0030923137 = product of:
      0.0061846273 = sum of:
        0.0061846273 = product of:
          0.018553881 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    BuB. 62(2010) H.1, S.61-63
  8. Oberhauser, O.: Relevance Ranking in den Online-Katalogen der "nächsten Generation" (2010) 0.00
    0.0030923137 = product of:
      0.0061846273 = sum of:
        0.0061846273 = product of:
          0.018553881 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 63(2010) H.1/2, S.25-37
  9. Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011) 0.00
    0.0030923137 = product of:
      0.0061846273 = sum of:
        0.0061846273 = product of:
          0.018553881 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ranking authors is vital for identifying a researcher's impact and standing within a scientific field. There are many different ranking methods (e.g., citations, publications, h-index, PageRank, and weighted PageRank), but most of them are topic-independent. This paper proposes topic-dependent ranks based on the combination of a topic model and a weighted PageRank algorithm. The author-conference-topic (ACT) model was used to extract topic distribution of individual authors. Two ways for combining the ACT model with the PageRank algorithm are proposed: simple combination (I_PR) or using a topic distribution as a weighted vector for PageRank (PR_t). Information retrieval was chosen as the test field and representative authors for different topics at different time phases were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the ranking difference between I_PR and PR_t.
  10. Liu, X.; Turtle, H.: Real-time user interest modeling for real-time ranking (2013) 0.00
    0.0030923137 = product of:
      0.0061846273 = sum of:
        0.0061846273 = product of:
          0.018553881 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=1035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Tsai, C.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Y.: Factors affecting rocchio-based pseudorelevance feedback in image retrieval (2015) 0.00
    0.0025769281 = product of:
      0.0051538562 = sum of:
        0.0051538562 = product of:
          0.015461569 = sum of:
            0.015461569 = weight(_text_:h in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015461569 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Bhansali, D.; Desai, H.; Deulkar, K.: ¬A study of different ranking approaches for semantic search (2015) 0.00
    0.0025769281 = product of:
      0.0051538562 = sum of:
        0.0051538562 = product of:
          0.015461569 = sum of:
            0.015461569 = weight(_text_:h in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015461569 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Liu, X.; Zheng, W.; Fang, H.: ¬An exploration of ranking models and feedback method for related entity finding (2013) 0.00
    0.0025769281 = product of:
      0.0051538562 = sum of:
        0.0051538562 = product of:
          0.015461569 = sum of:
            0.015461569 = weight(_text_:h in 2714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015461569 = score(doc=2714,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2714, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2714)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Xu, B.; Lin, H.; Lin, Y.: Assessment of learning to rank methods for query expansion (2016) 0.00
    0.0025769281 = product of:
      0.0051538562 = sum of:
        0.0051538562 = product of:
          0.015461569 = sum of:
            0.015461569 = weight(_text_:h in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015461569 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 9

Types

  • a 32
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…