Search (141 results, page 3 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Oberhauser, O.: Relevance Ranking in den Online-Katalogen der "nächsten Generation" (2010) 0.00
    0.0043454384 = product of:
      0.034763508 = sum of:
        0.010115947 = weight(_text_:und in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010115947 = score(doc=4308,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
        0.014531613 = weight(_text_:der in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014531613 = score(doc=4308,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
        0.010115947 = weight(_text_:und in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010115947 = score(doc=4308,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
      0.125 = coord(3/24)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen ist zwar kein neues Thema, doch liegt dazu nicht allzu viel Literatur vor, die das Prädikat "ernstzunehmen" verdient. Dies ist zum einen darin begründet, dass das Interesse an der Ausgabe ranggereihter Ergebnislisten auf Seiten aller Beteiligter (Bibliothekare, Softwarehersteller, Benutzer) traditionell gering war. Zum anderen ging die seit einigen Jahren populär gewordene Kritik an den bestehenden OPACs vielfach von einer unzureichenden Wissensbasis aus und produzierte oft nur polemische oder emotional gefärbte Beiträge, die zum Thema Ranking wenig beitrugen. ... Der hier beschriebene Test ist natürlich in keiner Weise erschöpfend oder repräsentativ. Dennoch gibt er, wie ich glaube, Anlass zu einiger Hoffnung. Er lässt vermuten, dass die "neuen" OPACs - zumindest was das Relevance Ranking betrifft - auf dem Weg in die richtige Richtung sind. Wie gut es wirklich gelingen wird, die Rankingleistung von Suchmaschinen wie Google, die unter völlig anderen Voraussetzungen arbeiten, einzuholen, wird aber erst die Zukunft zeigen.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 63(2010) H.1/2, S.25-37
  2. Berry, M.W.; Browne, M.: Understanding search engines : mathematical modeling and text retrieval (1999) 0.00
    0.003813412 = product of:
      0.030507296 = sum of:
        0.010115947 = weight(_text_:und in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010115947 = score(doc=5777,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
        0.010275402 = weight(_text_:der in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010275402 = score(doc=5777,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.20941564 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
        0.010115947 = weight(_text_:und in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010115947 = score(doc=5777,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
      0.125 = coord(3/24)
    
    Classification
    ST 230 [Informatik # Monographien # Software und -entwicklung # Software allgemein, (Einführung, Lehrbücher, Methoden der Programmierung) Software engineering, Programmentwicklungssysteme, Softwarewerkzeuge]
    RVK
    ST 230 [Informatik # Monographien # Software und -entwicklung # Software allgemein, (Einführung, Lehrbücher, Methoden der Programmierung) Software engineering, Programmentwicklungssysteme, Softwarewerkzeuge]
  3. Notess, G.R.: Search engine relevance : the never-ending quest (2000) 0.00
    0.003584227 = product of:
      0.043010723 = sum of:
        0.026057174 = weight(_text_:des in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026057174 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
        0.016953548 = weight(_text_:der in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016953548 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Abstract
    Bericht über verschiedene Relevanzverfahren der Suchdienste des Internet
  4. Ziegler, B.: ESS: ein schneller Algorithmus zur Mustersuche in Zeichenfolgen (1996) 0.00
    0.0027817436 = product of:
      0.033380922 = sum of:
        0.016690461 = weight(_text_:und in 7543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016690461 = score(doc=7543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 7543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7543)
        0.016690461 = weight(_text_:und in 7543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016690461 = score(doc=7543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 7543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7543)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Source
    Informatik: Forschung und Entwicklung. 11(1996) no.2, S.69-83
  5. Pfeifer, U.; Pennekamp, S.: Incremental processing of vague queries in interactive retrieval systems (1997) 0.00
    0.0015895677 = product of:
      0.019074813 = sum of:
        0.009537406 = weight(_text_:und in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009537406 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
        0.009537406 = weight(_text_:und in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009537406 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Source
    Hypertext - Information Retrieval - Multimedia '97: Theorien, Modelle und Implementierungen integrierter elektronischer Informationssysteme. Proceedings HIM '97. Hrsg.: N. Fuhr u.a
  6. Harper, D.J.: Relevance feedback in document retrieval (1980) 0.00
    0.0015510225 = product of:
      0.03722454 = sum of:
        0.03722454 = weight(_text_:des in 5867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03722454 = score(doc=5867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.61193633 = fieldWeight in 5867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5867)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Footnote
    Dissertation.- Darstellung des 'Harper-Algorithmus'
  7. Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023) 0.00
    0.0013562617 = product of:
      0.01627514 = sum of:
        0.0072658067 = weight(_text_:der in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072658067 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
        0.009009332 = product of:
          0.018018665 = sum of:
            0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018018665 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Date
    15. 9.2023 12:28:29
  8. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.00
    0.0013125994 = product of:
      0.015751192 = sum of:
        0.0052291043 = product of:
          0.015687313 = sum of:
            0.015687313 = weight(_text_:p in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015687313 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.010522088 = product of:
          0.021044176 = sum of:
            0.021044176 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021044176 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  9. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.00
    0.0012669344 = product of:
      0.015203213 = sum of:
        0.006274925 = product of:
          0.018824775 = sum of:
            0.018824775 = weight(_text_:p in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018824775 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008928288 = product of:
          0.017856576 = sum of:
            0.017856576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017856576 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  10. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.00
    0.0012669344 = product of:
      0.015203213 = sum of:
        0.006274925 = product of:
          0.018824775 = sum of:
            0.018824775 = weight(_text_:p in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018824775 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.008928288 = product of:
          0.017856576 = sum of:
            0.017856576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017856576 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
  11. Kleinberg, J.M.: Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment (1998) 0.00
    0.0011921758 = product of:
      0.0143061085 = sum of:
        0.0071530542 = weight(_text_:und in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071530542 = score(doc=5,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
        0.0071530542 = weight(_text_:und in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071530542 = score(doc=5,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Content
    Vorversionen auch in: Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1998, und als IBM Research Report RJ 10076, May 1997.
  12. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Fleet, C. van: Opening the black box of "relevance work" : a domain analysis (2012) 0.00
    0.0011283944 = product of:
      0.013540732 = sum of:
        0.006274925 = product of:
          0.018824775 = sum of:
            0.018824775 = weight(_text_:p in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018824775 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0072658067 = weight(_text_:der in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072658067 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Abstract
    In response to Hjørland's recent call for a reconceptualization of the foundations of relevance, we suggest that the sociocognitive aspects of intermediation by information agencies, such as archives and libraries, are a necessary and unexplored part of the infrastructure of the subject knowledge domains central to his recommended "view of relevance informed by a social paradigm" (2010, p. 217). From a comparative analysis of documents from 39 graduate-level introductory courses in archives, reference, and strategic/competitive intelligence taught in 13 American Library Association-accredited library and information science (LIS) programs, we identify four defining sociocognitive dimensions of "relevance work" in information agencies within Hjørland's proposed framework for relevance: tasks, time, systems, and assessors. This study is intended to supply sociocognitive content from within the relevance work domain to support further domain analytic research, and to emphasize the importance of intermediary relevance work for all subject knowledge domains.
  13. Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012) 0.00
    0.0010557787 = product of:
      0.012669344 = sum of:
        0.0052291043 = product of:
          0.015687313 = sum of:
            0.015687313 = weight(_text_:p in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015687313 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.00744024 = product of:
          0.01488048 = sum of:
            0.01488048 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01488048 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
    Date
    11. 6.2012 14:22:34
  14. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.00
    9.92032E-4 = product of:
      0.023808768 = sum of:
        0.023808768 = product of:
          0.047617536 = sum of:
            0.047617536 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047617536 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  15. Figuerola, C.G.; Zazo, A.F.; Berrocal, J.L.A.: ¬La interaccion con el usuario en los sistemas de cuperacion de informacion realimentacion por relecvancia (2002) 0.00
    9.306135E-4 = product of:
      0.022334723 = sum of:
        0.022334723 = weight(_text_:des in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022334723 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: User interaction in retrieval information systems through relevance feedback
  16. Archuby, C.G.: Interfaces se recuperacion para catalogos en linea con salidas ordenadas por probable relevancia (2000) 0.00
    8.848001E-4 = product of:
      0.021235202 = sum of:
        0.021235202 = product of:
          0.042470403 = sum of:
            0.042470403 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042470403 = score(doc=5727,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
    Source
    Ciencia da informacao. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-13
  17. Crestani, F.: Combination of similarity measures for effective spoken document retrieval (2003) 0.00
    8.7590737E-4 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = product of:
          0.04204355 = sum of:
            0.04204355 = weight(_text_:29 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04204355 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.2, S.87-96
  18. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.00
    8.6802803E-4 = product of:
      0.020832673 = sum of:
        0.020832673 = product of:
          0.041665345 = sum of:
            0.041665345 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041665345 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  19. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.00
    8.6802803E-4 = product of:
      0.020832673 = sum of:
        0.020832673 = product of:
          0.041665345 = sum of:
            0.041665345 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041665345 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  20. Courtois, M.P.; Berry, M.W.: Results ranking in Web search engines (1999) 0.00
    7.7551126E-4 = product of:
      0.01861227 = sum of:
        0.01861227 = weight(_text_:des in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01861227 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Abstract
    Comparaison des méthodes de classement de 5 moteurs de recherche (AltaVista, HotBot, Excie, Infoseek et Lycos). Sont testées la présence de tous les mots, la proximité et la localisation

Languages

  • e 100
  • d 38
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 121
  • x 7
  • m 5
  • el 3
  • r 3
  • s 3
  • p 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…