Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Schamber, L.; Bateman, J.: Relevance criteria uses and importance : progress in development of a measurement scale (1999) 0.04 
    0.036013078 = product of:
  0.14405231 = sum of:
    0.14405231 = weight(_text_:assess in 6691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14405231 = score(doc=6691,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.39077166 = fieldWeight in 6691, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6691)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The criteria employed by end-users in making relevance judgments can be powerful and useful indicators of the values users ascribe to a variety of factors in their information seeking and use situations. This paper describes intermediate results in a long-term project intended to develop a measurement scale based on users' relevance criteria. The five tests that are reported here have involved 350 users in an effort to progressively refine and validate the scale content. The range of research questions and types of users and information environments have gradually been expanded to assess the adaptability and transferability of the instrument. The instrument provides quantitative data, notably criterion importance ratings that can be analyzed using several techniques. The substantive findings confirm those of previous studies on relevance evaluation behavior
  2. Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.; Mat-Hassan, M.: Methods for evaluating dynamic changes in search engine rankings : a case study (2006) 0.03 
    0.033953458 = product of:
  0.13581383 = sum of:
    0.13581383 = weight(_text_:assess in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13581383 = score(doc=616,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.36842304 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The objective of this paper is to characterize the changes in the rankings of the top ten results of major search engines over time and to compare the rankings between these engines. Design/methodology/approach - The papers compare rankings of the top-ten results of the search engines Google and AlltheWeb on ten identical queries over a period of three weeks. Only the top-ten results were considered, since users do not normally inspect more than the first results page returned by a search engine. The experiment was repeated twice, in October 2003 and in January 2004, in order to assess changes to the top-ten results of some of the queries during the three months interval. In order to assess the changes in the rankings, three measures were computed for each data collection point and each search engine. Findings - The findings in this paper show that the rankings of AlltheWeb were highly stable over each period, while the rankings of Google underwent constant yet minor changes, with occasional major ones. Changes over time can be explained by the dynamic nature of the web or by fluctuations in the search engines' indexes. The top-ten results of the two search engines had surprisingly low overlap. With such small overlap, the task of comparing the rankings of the two engines becomes extremely challenging. Originality/value - The paper shows that because of the abundance of information on the web, ranking search results is of extreme importance. The paper compares several measures for computing the similarity between rankings of search tools, and shows that none of the measures is fully satisfactory as a standalone measure. It also demonstrates the apparent differences in the ranking algorithms of two widely used search engines.
  3. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03 
    0.033891086 = product of:
  0.13556434 = sum of:
    0.13556434 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13556434 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  4. Silva, R.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Veloso, A.: ¬A Two-stage active learning method for learning to rank (2014) 0.03 
    0.030010901 = product of:
  0.120043606 = sum of:
    0.120043606 = weight(_text_:assess in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.120043606 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.32564306 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Learning to rank (L2R) algorithms use a labeled training set to generate a ranking model that can later be used to rank new query results. These training sets are costly and laborious to produce, requiring human annotators to assess the relevance or order of the documents in relation to a query. Active learning algorithms are able to reduce the labeling effort by selectively sampling an unlabeled set and choosing data instances that maximize a learning function's effectiveness. In this article, we propose a novel two-stage active learning method for L2R that combines and exploits interesting properties of its constituent parts, thus being effective and practical. In the first stage, an association rule active sampling algorithm is used to select a very small but effective initial training set. In the second stage, a query-by-committee strategy trained with the first-stage set is used to iteratively select more examples until a preset labeling budget is met or a target effectiveness is achieved. We test our method with various LETOR benchmarking data sets and compare it with several baselines to show that it achieves good results using only a small portion of the original training sets.
  5. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.03 
    0.029654698 = product of:
  0.118618794 = sum of:
    0.118618794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.118618794 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  6. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.03 
    0.029654698 = product of:
  0.118618794 = sum of:
    0.118618794 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.118618794 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  7. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.03 
    0.025418311 = product of:
  0.101673245 = sum of:
    0.101673245 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101673245 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  8. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.03 
    0.025418311 = product of:
  0.101673245 = sum of:
    0.101673245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101673245 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  9. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.02 
    0.016945543 = product of:
  0.06778217 = sum of:
    0.06778217 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06778217 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  10. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.02 
    0.016945543 = product of:
  0.06778217 = sum of:
    0.06778217 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06778217 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  11. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.02 
    0.016945543 = product of:
  0.06778217 = sum of:
    0.06778217 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06778217 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  12. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.02 
    0.016945543 = product of:
  0.06778217 = sum of:
    0.06778217 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06778217 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  13. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.02 
    0.016945543 = product of:
  0.06778217 = sum of:
    0.06778217 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06778217 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  14. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.01 
    0.0149778845 = product of:
  0.059911538 = sum of:
    0.059911538 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059911538 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  15. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01 
    0.014827349 = product of:
  0.059309397 = sum of:
    0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059309397 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  16. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.01 
    0.014827349 = product of:
  0.059309397 = sum of:
    0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059309397 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  17. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.01 
    0.012709156 = product of:
  0.050836623 = sum of:
    0.050836623 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050836623 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  18. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.01 
    0.012709156 = product of:
  0.050836623 = sum of:
    0.050836623 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050836623 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  19. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.01 
    0.012709156 = product of:
  0.050836623 = sum of:
    0.050836623 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050836623 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36
  20. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.01 
    0.012709156 = product of:
  0.050836623 = sum of:
    0.050836623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050836623 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062536046 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 28
  • d 4

Types

  • a 30
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications