-
Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009)
0.09
0.09036308 = sum of:
0.047314003 = product of:
0.18925601 = sum of:
0.18925601 = weight(_text_:authors in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18925601 = score(doc=3161,freq=12.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
-
Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011)
0.08
0.076505125 = sum of:
0.033456054 = product of:
0.13382421 = sum of:
0.13382421 = weight(_text_:authors in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13382421 = score(doc=4348,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking authors is vital for identifying a researcher's impact and standing within a scientific field. There are many different ranking methods (e.g., citations, publications, h-index, PageRank, and weighted PageRank), but most of them are topic-independent. This paper proposes topic-dependent ranks based on the combination of a topic model and a weighted PageRank algorithm. The author-conference-topic (ACT) model was used to extract topic distribution of individual authors. Two ways for combining the ACT model with the PageRank algorithm are proposed: simple combination (I_PR) or using a topic distribution as a weighted vector for PageRank (PR_t). Information retrieval was chosen as the test field and representative authors for different topics at different time phases were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the ranking difference between I_PR and PR_t.
-
Yan, E.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.: P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2011)
0.07
0.07036583 = sum of:
0.027316753 = product of:
0.10926701 = sum of:
0.10926701 = weight(_text_:authors in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10926701 = score(doc=4349,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=4349,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking scientific productivity and prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way.
-
Zhang, D.; Dong, Y.: ¬An effective algorithm to rank Web resources (2000)
0.05
0.050223917 = product of:
0.10044783 = sum of:
0.10044783 = product of:
0.20089567 = sum of:
0.20089567 = weight(_text_:y in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20089567 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.7443802 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Okada, M.; Ando, K.; Lee, S.S.; Hayashi, Y.; Aoe, J.I.: ¬An efficient substring search method by using delayed keyword extraction (2001)
0.04
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = product of:
0.1721963 = sum of:
0.1721963 = weight(_text_:y in 6415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1721963 = score(doc=6415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.6380402 = fieldWeight in 6415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.04
0.04175939 = sum of:
0.022763962 = product of:
0.09105585 = sum of:
0.09105585 = weight(_text_:authors in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09105585 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.018995428 = product of:
0.037990857 = sum of:
0.037990857 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037990857 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new challenge, accessing multiple relevant entities, arises from the availability of linked heterogeneous data. In this article, we address more specifically the problem of accessing relevant entities, such as publications and authors within a bibliographic network, given an information need. We propose a novel algorithm, called BibRank, that estimates a joint relevance of documents and authors within a bibliographic network. This model ranks each type of entity using a score propagation algorithm with respect to the query topic and the structure of the underlying bi-type information entity network. Evidence sources, namely content-based and network-based scores, are both used to estimate the topical similarity between connected entities. For this purpose, authorship relationships are analyzed through a language model-based score on the one hand and on the other hand, non topically related entities of the same type are detected through marginal citations. The article reports the results of experiments using the Bibrank algorithm for an information retrieval task. The CiteSeerX bibliographic data set forms the basis for the topical query automatic generation and evaluation. We show that a statistically significant improvement over closely related ranking models is achieved.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.03
0.030392684 = product of:
0.060785368 = sum of:
0.060785368 = product of:
0.121570736 = sum of:
0.121570736 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.121570736 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.03
0.026593598 = product of:
0.053187195 = sum of:
0.053187195 = product of:
0.10637439 = sum of:
0.10637439 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10637439 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.03
0.026593598 = product of:
0.053187195 = sum of:
0.053187195 = product of:
0.10637439 = sum of:
0.10637439 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10637439 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Tsai, C.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Y.: Factors affecting rocchio-based pseudorelevance feedback in image retrieval (2015)
0.03
0.02536691 = product of:
0.05073382 = sum of:
0.05073382 = product of:
0.10146764 = sum of:
0.10146764 = weight(_text_:y in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10146764 = score(doc=1607,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004)
0.02
0.024564385 = sum of:
0.011267586 = product of:
0.045070343 = sum of:
0.045070343 = weight(_text_:authors in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045070343 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.013296799 = product of:
0.026593598 = sum of:
0.026593598 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026593598 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A relevancy-ranking algorithm for a natural language interface to Boolean online public access catalogs (OPACs) was formulated and compared with that currently used in a knowledge-based search interface called the E-Referencer, being developed by the authors. The algorithm makes use of seven weIl-known ranking criteria: breadth of match, section weighting, proximity of query words, variant word forms (stemming), document frequency, term frequency and document length. The algorithm converts a natural language query into a series of increasingly broader Boolean search statements. In a small experiment with ten subjects in which the algorithm was simulated by hand, the algorithm obtained good results with a mean overall precision of 0.42 and mean average precision of 0.62, representing a 27 percent improvement in precision and 41 percent improvement in average precision compared to the E-Referencer. The usefulness of each step in the algorithm was analyzed and suggestions are made for improving the algorithm.
- Source
- Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.022794513 = product of:
0.045589026 = sum of:
0.045589026 = product of:
0.09117805 = sum of:
0.09117805 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09117805 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.022794513 = product of:
0.045589026 = sum of:
0.045589026 = product of:
0.09117805 = sum of:
0.09117805 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09117805 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
-
Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Houston, A.L.: Semantic indexing and searching using a Hopfield net (1998)
0.02
0.021524537 = product of:
0.043049075 = sum of:
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.; Foo, S.: Organsising keywords in a Web search environment : a methodology based on co-word analysis (2000)
0.02
0.021524537 = product of:
0.043049075 = sum of:
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nie, J.-Y.: Query expansion and query translation as logical inference (2003)
0.02
0.021524537 = product of:
0.043049075 = sum of:
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Xu, Y.; Wang, D.: Order effect in relevance judgment : mediation and causality (2008)
0.02
0.021524537 = product of:
0.043049075 = sum of:
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=1877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023)
0.02
0.021524537 = product of:
0.043049075 = sum of:
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of intelligent information systems [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-023-00815-y]
-
Wei, F.; Li, W.; Lu, Q.; He, Y.: Applying two-level reinforcement ranking in query-oriented multidocument summarization (2009)
0.02
0.017937114 = product of:
0.03587423 = sum of:
0.03587423 = product of:
0.07174846 = sum of:
0.07174846 = weight(_text_:y in 3120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07174846 = score(doc=3120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 3120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Liu, R.-L.; Huang, Y.-C.: Ranker enhancement for proximity-based ranking of biomedical texts (2011)
0.02
0.017937114 = product of:
0.03587423 = sum of:
0.03587423 = product of:
0.07174846 = sum of:
0.07174846 = weight(_text_:y in 4947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07174846 = score(doc=4947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 4947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4947)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
