Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.07
    0.068840474 = sum of:
      0.009328886 = product of:
        0.0653022 = sum of:
          0.0653022 = weight(_text_:authors in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0653022 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1833521 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040219255 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.059511587 = sum of:
        0.03226582 = weight(_text_:w in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03226582 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040219255 = queryNorm
            0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.02724577 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02724577 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040219255 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    
    Abstract
    A new challenge, accessing multiple relevant entities, arises from the availability of linked heterogeneous data. In this article, we address more specifically the problem of accessing relevant entities, such as publications and authors within a bibliographic network, given an information need. We propose a novel algorithm, called BibRank, that estimates a joint relevance of documents and authors within a bibliographic network. This model ranks each type of entity using a score propagation algorithm with respect to the query topic and the structure of the underlying bi-type information entity network. Evidence sources, namely content-based and network-based scores, are both used to estimate the topical similarity between connected entities. For this purpose, authorship relationships are analyzed through a language model-based score on the one hand and on the other hand, non topically related entities of the same type are detected through marginal citations. The article reports the results of experiments using the Bibrank algorithm for an information retrieval task. The CiteSeerX bibliographic data set forms the basis for the topical query automatic generation and evaluation. We show that a statistically significant improvement over closely related ranking models is achieved.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
  2. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.05
    0.046275675 = sum of:
      0.0046175625 = product of:
        0.032322936 = sum of:
          0.032322936 = weight(_text_:authors in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032322936 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833521 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040219255 = queryNorm
              0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.04165811 = sum of:
        0.022586072 = weight(_text_:w in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022586072 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040219255 = queryNorm
            0.14736348 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.019072037 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019072037 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040219255 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
    
    Abstract
    A relevancy-ranking algorithm for a natural language interface to Boolean online public access catalogs (OPACs) was formulated and compared with that currently used in a knowledge-based search interface called the E-Referencer, being developed by the authors. The algorithm makes use of seven weIl-known ranking criteria: breadth of match, section weighting, proximity of query words, variant word forms (stemming), document frequency, term frequency and document length. The algorithm converts a natural language query into a series of increasingly broader Boolean search statements. In a small experiment with ten subjects in which the algorithm was simulated by hand, the algorithm obtained good results with a mean overall precision of 0.42 and mean average precision of 0.62, representing a 27 percent improvement in precision and 41 percent improvement in average precision compared to the E-Referencer. The usefulness of each step in the algorithm was analyzed and suggestions are made for improving the algorithm.
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  3. Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001) 0.05
    0.045888703 = product of:
      0.09177741 = sum of:
        0.09177741 = sum of:
          0.06453164 = weight(_text_:w in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06453164 = score(doc=1753,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040219255 = queryNorm
              0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
          0.02724577 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02724577 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040219255 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    TVA (W)
    TLQ (W)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:26:32
    GHBS
    TVA (W)
    TLQ (W)
  4. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.04
    0.035706952 = product of:
      0.071413904 = sum of:
        0.071413904 = sum of:
          0.03871898 = weight(_text_:w in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03871898 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040219255 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
          0.03269492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03269492 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040219255 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  5. Wei, F.; Li, W.; Liu, S.: iRANK: a rank-learn-combine framework for unsupervised ensemble ranking (2010) 0.03
    0.027558416 = sum of:
      0.011425506 = product of:
        0.07997854 = sum of:
          0.07997854 = weight(_text_:authors in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07997854 = score(doc=3472,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.1833521 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040219255 = queryNorm
              0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.01613291 = product of:
        0.03226582 = sum of:
          0.03226582 = weight(_text_:w in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03226582 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040219255 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors address the problem of unsupervised ensemble ranking. Traditional approaches either combine multiple ranking criteria into a unified representation to obtain an overall ranking score or to utilize certain rank fusion or aggregation techniques to combine the ranking results. Beyond the aforementioned combine-then-rank and rank-then-combine approaches, the authors propose a novel rank-learn-combine ranking framework, called Interactive Ranking (iRANK), which allows two base rankers to teach each other before combination during the ranking process by providing their own ranking results as feedback to the others to boost the ranking performance. This mutual ranking refinement process continues until the two base rankers cannot learn from each other any more. The overall performance is improved by the enhancement of the base rankers through the mutual learning mechanism. The authors further design two ranking refinement strategies to efficiently and effectively use the feedback based on reasonable assumptions and rational analysis. Although iRANK is applicable to many applications, as a case study, they apply this framework to the sentence ranking problem in query-focused summarization and evaluate its effectiveness on the DUC 2005 and 2006 data sets. The results are encouraging with consistent and promising improvements.
  6. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.021796616 = product of:
      0.04359323 = sum of:
        0.04359323 = product of:
          0.08718646 = sum of:
            0.08718646 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08718646 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  7. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.019072037 = product of:
      0.038144074 = sum of:
        0.038144074 = product of:
          0.07628815 = sum of:
            0.07628815 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07628815 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  8. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.019072037 = product of:
      0.038144074 = sum of:
        0.038144074 = product of:
          0.07628815 = sum of:
            0.07628815 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07628815 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  9. Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008) 0.02
    0.018037142 = product of:
      0.036074284 = sum of:
        0.036074284 = product of:
          0.07214857 = sum of:
            0.07214857 = weight(_text_:w in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07214857 = score(doc=5586,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.4707354 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on the practical limitations in the content and software of the databases that are used to calculate the h-index for assessing the publishing productivity and impact of researchers. To celebrate F. W. Lancaster's biological age of seventy-five, and "scientific age" of forty-five, this paper discusses the related features of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), and demonstrates in the latter how a much more realistic and fair h-index can be computed for F. W. Lancaster than the one produced automatically. Browsing and searching the cited reference index of the 1945-2007 edition of WoS, which in my estimate has over a hundred million "orphan references" that have no counterpart master records to be attached to, and "stray references" that cite papers which do have master records but cannot be identified by the matching algorithm because of errors of omission and commission in the references of the citing works, can bring up hundreds of additional cited references given to works of an accomplished author but are ignored in the automatic process of calculating the h-index. The partially manual process doubled the h-index value for F. W. Lancaster from 13 to 26, which is a much more realistic value for an information scientist and professor of his stature.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'The Influence of F. W. Lancaster on Information Science and on Libraries', das als Festschrift für F.W. Lancaster deklariert ist.
  10. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.01634746 = product of:
      0.03269492 = sum of:
        0.03269492 = product of:
          0.06538984 = sum of:
            0.06538984 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06538984 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  11. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.01634746 = product of:
      0.03269492 = sum of:
        0.03269492 = product of:
          0.06538984 = sum of:
            0.06538984 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06538984 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  12. Zhang, W.; Korf, R.E.: Performance of linear-space search algorithms (1995) 0.02
    0.01613291 = product of:
      0.03226582 = sum of:
        0.03226582 = product of:
          0.06453164 = sum of:
            0.06453164 = weight(_text_:w in 4744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06453164 = score(doc=4744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 4744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Fuhr, N.: Modelle im Information Retrieval (2013) 0.02
    0.01613291 = product of:
      0.03226582 = sum of:
        0.03226582 = product of:
          0.06453164 = sum of:
            0.06453164 = weight(_text_:w in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06453164 = score(doc=724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  14. Harman, D.; Fox, E.; Baeza-Yates, R.; Lee, W.: Inverted files (1992) 0.01
    0.012906328 = product of:
      0.025812656 = sum of:
        0.025812656 = product of:
          0.05162531 = sum of:
            0.05162531 = weight(_text_:w in 3497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05162531 = score(doc=3497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 3497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Goffman, W.: ¬A searching procedure for information retrieval (1964) 0.01
    0.012906328 = product of:
      0.025812656 = sum of:
        0.025812656 = product of:
          0.05162531 = sum of:
            0.05162531 = weight(_text_:w in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05162531 = score(doc=5281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Liddy, E.D.; Paik, W.; McKenna, M.; Yu, E.S.: ¬A natural language text retrieval system with relevance feedback (1995) 0.01
    0.011293036 = product of:
      0.022586072 = sum of:
        0.022586072 = product of:
          0.045172144 = sum of:
            0.045172144 = weight(_text_:w in 3131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045172144 = score(doc=3131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 3131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Ning, X.; Jin, H.; Jia, W.; Yuan, P.: Practical and effective IR-style keyword search over semantic web (2009) 0.01
    0.011293036 = product of:
      0.022586072 = sum of:
        0.022586072 = product of:
          0.045172144 = sum of:
            0.045172144 = weight(_text_:w in 4213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045172144 = score(doc=4213,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 4213, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.010898308 = product of:
      0.021796616 = sum of:
        0.021796616 = product of:
          0.04359323 = sum of:
            0.04359323 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04359323 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  19. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01
    0.010898308 = product of:
      0.021796616 = sum of:
        0.021796616 = product of:
          0.04359323 = sum of:
            0.04359323 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04359323 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  20. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.010898308 = product of:
      0.021796616 = sum of:
        0.021796616 = product of:
          0.04359323 = sum of:
            0.04359323 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04359323 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14084098 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040219255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23

Years

Languages

  • e 56
  • d 5

Types

  • a 54
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…