-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.07
0.067112364 = product of:
0.13422473 = sum of:
0.13422473 = sum of:
0.019353455 = weight(_text_:e in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019353455 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.11487127 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11487127 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.06
0.06345472 = sum of:
0.021509495 = product of:
0.08603798 = sum of:
0.08603798 = weight(_text_:authors in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603798 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.041945226 = sum of:
0.006047955 = weight(_text_:e in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006047955 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.035897274 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035897274 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
- Abstract
- A new challenge, accessing multiple relevant entities, arises from the availability of linked heterogeneous data. In this article, we address more specifically the problem of accessing relevant entities, such as publications and authors within a bibliographic network, given an information need. We propose a novel algorithm, called BibRank, that estimates a joint relevance of documents and authors within a bibliographic network. This model ranks each type of entity using a score propagation algorithm with respect to the query topic and the structure of the underlying bi-type information entity network. Evidence sources, namely content-based and network-based scores, are both used to estimate the topical similarity between connected entities. For this purpose, authorship relationships are analyzed through a language model-based score on the one hand and on the other hand, non topically related entities of the same type are detected through marginal citations. The article reports the results of experiments using the Bibrank algorithm for an information retrieval task. The CiteSeerX bibliographic data set forms the basis for the topical query automatic generation and evaluation. We show that a statistically significant improvement over closely related ranking models is achieved.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
- Language
- e
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.06
0.058723316 = product of:
0.11744663 = sum of:
0.11744663 = sum of:
0.016934272 = weight(_text_:e in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016934272 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.10051236 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10051236 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
- Language
- e
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.06
0.058723316 = product of:
0.11744663 = sum of:
0.11744663 = sum of:
0.016934272 = weight(_text_:e in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016934272 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.10051236 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10051236 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
- Language
- e
-
Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009)
0.05
0.049838502 = sum of:
0.044706643 = product of:
0.17882657 = sum of:
0.17882657 = weight(_text_:authors in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17882657 = score(doc=3161,freq=12.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0051318603 = product of:
0.0102637205 = sum of:
0.0102637205 = weight(_text_:e in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0102637205 = score(doc=3161,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
- Language
- e
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004)
0.05
0.04614483 = sum of:
0.010646656 = product of:
0.042586625 = sum of:
0.042586625 = weight(_text_:authors in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042586625 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.035498172 = sum of:
0.010370083 = weight(_text_:e in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010370083 = score(doc=2509,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.13614988 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.02512809 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02512809 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
- Abstract
- A relevancy-ranking algorithm for a natural language interface to Boolean online public access catalogs (OPACs) was formulated and compared with that currently used in a knowledge-based search interface called the E-Referencer, being developed by the authors. The algorithm makes use of seven weIl-known ranking criteria: breadth of match, section weighting, proximity of query words, variant word forms (stemming), document frequency, term frequency and document length. The algorithm converts a natural language query into a series of increasingly broader Boolean search statements. In a small experiment with ten subjects in which the algorithm was simulated by hand, the algorithm obtained good results with a mean overall precision of 0.42 and mean average precision of 0.62, representing a 27 percent improvement in precision and 41 percent improvement in average precision compared to the E-Referencer. The usefulness of each step in the algorithm was analyzed and suggestions are made for improving the algorithm.
- Content
- "Most Web search engines accept natural language queries, perform some kind of fuzzy matching and produce ranked output, displaying first the documents that are most likely to be relevant. On the other hand, most library online public access catalogs (OPACs) an the Web are still Boolean retrieval systems that perform exact matching, and require users to express their search requests precisely in a Boolean search language and to refine their search statements to improve the search results. It is well-documented that users have difficulty searching Boolean OPACs effectively (e.g. Borgman, 1996; Ensor, 1992; Wallace, 1993). One approach to making OPACs easier to use is to develop a natural language search interface that acts as a middleware between the user's Web browser and the OPAC system. The search interface can accept a natural language query from the user and reformulate it as a series of Boolean search statements that are then submitted to the OPAC. The records retrieved by the OPAC are ranked by the search interface before forwarding them to the user's Web browser. The user, then, does not need to interact directly with the Boolean OPAC but with the natural language search interface or search intermediary. The search interface interacts with the OPAC system an the user's behalf. The advantage of this approach is that no modification to the OPAC or library system is required. Furthermore, the search interface can access multiple OPACs, acting as a meta search engine, and integrate search results from various OPACs before sending them to the user. The search interface needs to incorporate a method for converting the user's natural language query into a series of Boolean search statements, and for ranking the OPAC records retrieved. The purpose of this study was to develop a relevancyranking algorithm for a search interface to Boolean OPAC systems. This is part of an on-going effort to develop a knowledge-based search interface to OPACs called the E-Referencer (Khoo et al., 1998, 1999; Poo et al., 2000). E-Referencer v. 2 that has been implemented applies a repertoire of initial search strategies and reformulation strategies to retrieve records from OPACs using the Z39.50 protocol, and also assists users in mapping query keywords to the Library of Congress subject headings."
- Language
- e
- Object
- E-Referencer
- Source
- Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
-
Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011)
0.04
0.035241142 = sum of:
0.03161237 = product of:
0.12644948 = sum of:
0.12644948 = weight(_text_:authors in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12644948 = score(doc=4348,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0036287727 = product of:
0.0072575454 = sum of:
0.0072575454 = weight(_text_:e in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072575454 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking authors is vital for identifying a researcher's impact and standing within a scientific field. There are many different ranking methods (e.g., citations, publications, h-index, PageRank, and weighted PageRank), but most of them are topic-independent. This paper proposes topic-dependent ranks based on the combination of a topic model and a weighted PageRank algorithm. The author-conference-topic (ACT) model was used to extract topic distribution of individual authors. Two ways for combining the ACT model with the PageRank algorithm are proposed: simple combination (I_PR) or using a topic distribution as a weighted vector for PageRank (PR_t). Information retrieval was chosen as the test field and representative authors for different topics at different time phases were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the ranking difference between I_PR and PR_t.
- Language
- e
-
MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004)
0.03
0.033556182 = product of:
0.067112364 = sum of:
0.067112364 = sum of:
0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0096767275 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057435635 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992)
0.03
0.033556182 = product of:
0.067112364 = sum of:
0.067112364 = sum of:
0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0096767275 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057435635 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 5.1999 15:22:48
- Language
- e
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.03
0.033556182 = product of:
0.067112364 = sum of:
0.067112364 = sum of:
0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0096767275 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057435635 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.03
0.033556182 = product of:
0.067112364 = sum of:
0.067112364 = sum of:
0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0096767275 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057435635 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Language
- e
-
Yan, E.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.: P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2011)
0.03
0.030943252 = sum of:
0.025811393 = product of:
0.10324557 = sum of:
0.10324557 = weight(_text_:authors in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10324557 = score(doc=4349,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0051318603 = product of:
0.0102637205 = sum of:
0.0102637205 = weight(_text_:e in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0102637205 = score(doc=4349,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking scientific productivity and prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way.
- Language
- e
-
Biskri, I.; Rompré, L.: Using association rules for query reformulation (2012)
0.03
0.029440165 = sum of:
0.025811393 = product of:
0.10324557 = sum of:
0.10324557 = weight(_text_:authors in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10324557 = score(doc=92,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0036287727 = product of:
0.0072575454 = sum of:
0.0072575454 = weight(_text_:e in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072575454 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper the authors will present research on the combination of two methods of data mining: text classification and maximal association rules. Text classification has been the focus of interest of many researchers for a long time. However, the results take the form of lists of words (classes) that people often do not know what to do with. The use of maximal association rules induced a number of advantages: (1) the detection of dependencies and correlations between the relevant units of information (words) of different classes, (2) the extraction of hidden knowledge, often relevant, from a large volume of data. The authors will show how this combination can improve the process of information retrieval.
- Language
- e
-
Wei, F.; Li, W.; Liu, S.: iRANK: a rank-learn-combine framework for unsupervised ensemble ranking (2010)
0.03
0.029367622 = sum of:
0.026343646 = product of:
0.10537458 = sum of:
0.10537458 = weight(_text_:authors in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10537458 = score(doc=3472,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0030239774 = product of:
0.006047955 = sum of:
0.006047955 = weight(_text_:e in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006047955 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors address the problem of unsupervised ensemble ranking. Traditional approaches either combine multiple ranking criteria into a unified representation to obtain an overall ranking score or to utilize certain rank fusion or aggregation techniques to combine the ranking results. Beyond the aforementioned combine-then-rank and rank-then-combine approaches, the authors propose a novel rank-learn-combine ranking framework, called Interactive Ranking (iRANK), which allows two base rankers to teach each other before combination during the ranking process by providing their own ranking results as feedback to the others to boost the ranking performance. This mutual ranking refinement process continues until the two base rankers cannot learn from each other any more. The overall performance is improved by the enhancement of the base rankers through the mutual learning mechanism. The authors further design two ranking refinement strategies to efficiently and effectively use the feedback based on reasonable assumptions and rational analysis. Although iRANK is applicable to many applications, as a case study, they apply this framework to the sentence ranking problem in query-focused summarization and evaluate its effectiveness on the DUC 2005 and 2006 data sets. The results are encouraging with consistent and promising improvements.
- Language
- e
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.03
0.029361658 = product of:
0.058723316 = sum of:
0.058723316 = sum of:
0.008467136 = weight(_text_:e in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008467136 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.05025618 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05025618 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Language
- e
-
Ojala, M.: Commands that RANKle (1997)
0.03
0.029173577 = sum of:
0.024335213 = product of:
0.09734085 = sum of:
0.09734085 = weight(_text_:authors in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09734085 = score(doc=428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0048383637 = product of:
0.0096767275 = sum of:
0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0096767275 = score(doc=428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines the RANK command on DIALOG using a statistical analysis of articles in DATABASE as an example. The RANK command was used to find authors, company names, and length of articles. Use of the command revealed a number of complexities and revealed some problematic indexing on the part of the database producers. The LEXIS-NEXIS RANK command was also used, but this fulfils a different function to the command of the same name in DIALOG
- Language
- e
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.03
0.028407183 = product of:
0.056814365 = sum of:
0.056814365 = sum of:
0.006047955 = weight(_text_:e in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006047955 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.05076641 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05076641 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
- Language
- e
-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.03
0.026670225 = product of:
0.05334045 = sum of:
0.05334045 = sum of:
0.0102637205 = weight(_text_:e in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0102637205 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.043076728 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043076728 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
- Language
- e
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon
-
Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996)
0.03
0.025167137 = product of:
0.050334275 = sum of:
0.050334275 = sum of:
0.0072575454 = weight(_text_:e in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072575454 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
0.043076728 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043076728 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 9.1996 13:56:22
- Language
- e
-
Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996)
0.03
0.025167137 = product of:
0.050334275 = sum of:
0.050334275 = sum of:
0.0072575454 = weight(_text_:e in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072575454 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.043076728 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043076728 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
