-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.04
0.038733326 = sum of:
0.021114388 = product of:
0.084457554 = sum of:
0.084457554 = weight(_text_:authors in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084457554 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01761894 = product of:
0.03523788 = sum of:
0.03523788 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03523788 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new challenge, accessing multiple relevant entities, arises from the availability of linked heterogeneous data. In this article, we address more specifically the problem of accessing relevant entities, such as publications and authors within a bibliographic network, given an information need. We propose a novel algorithm, called BibRank, that estimates a joint relevance of documents and authors within a bibliographic network. This model ranks each type of entity using a score propagation algorithm with respect to the query topic and the structure of the underlying bi-type information entity network. Evidence sources, namely content-based and network-based scores, are both used to estimate the topical similarity between connected entities. For this purpose, authorship relationships are analyzed through a language model-based score on the one hand and on the other hand, non topically related entities of the same type are detected through marginal citations. The article reports the results of experiments using the Bibrank algorithm for an information retrieval task. The CiteSeerX bibliographic data set forms the basis for the topical query automatic generation and evaluation. We show that a statistically significant improvement over closely related ranking models is achieved.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
-
Liddy, E.D.; Diamond, T.; McKenna, M.: DR-LINK in TIPSTER (2000)
0.04
0.03567564 = product of:
0.07135128 = sum of:
0.07135128 = product of:
0.14270256 = sum of:
0.14270256 = weight(_text_:t in 3907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14270256 = score(doc=3907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.69639564 = fieldWeight in 3907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3907)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Niemi, T.; Junkkari, M.; Järvelin, K.; Viita, S.: Advanced query language for manipulating complex entities (2004)
0.03
0.031216186 = product of:
0.06243237 = sum of:
0.06243237 = product of:
0.12486474 = sum of:
0.12486474 = weight(_text_:t in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12486474 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.03
0.028190302 = product of:
0.056380603 = sum of:
0.056380603 = product of:
0.11276121 = sum of:
0.11276121 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11276121 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.02
0.024666514 = product of:
0.04933303 = sum of:
0.04933303 = product of:
0.09866606 = sum of:
0.09866606 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09866606 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.02
0.024666514 = product of:
0.04933303 = sum of:
0.04933303 = product of:
0.09866606 = sum of:
0.09866606 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09866606 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004)
0.02
0.022784345 = sum of:
0.010451089 = product of:
0.041804355 = sum of:
0.041804355 = weight(_text_:authors in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041804355 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012333257 = product of:
0.024666514 = sum of:
0.024666514 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024666514 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A relevancy-ranking algorithm for a natural language interface to Boolean online public access catalogs (OPACs) was formulated and compared with that currently used in a knowledge-based search interface called the E-Referencer, being developed by the authors. The algorithm makes use of seven weIl-known ranking criteria: breadth of match, section weighting, proximity of query words, variant word forms (stemming), document frequency, term frequency and document length. The algorithm converts a natural language query into a series of increasingly broader Boolean search statements. In a small experiment with ten subjects in which the algorithm was simulated by hand, the algorithm obtained good results with a mean overall precision of 0.42 and mean average precision of 0.62, representing a 27 percent improvement in precision and 41 percent improvement in average precision compared to the E-Referencer. The usefulness of each step in the algorithm was analyzed and suggestions are made for improving the algorithm.
- Source
- Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
-
Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.: Selective relevance feedback using term characteristics (1999)
0.02
0.022297276 = product of:
0.044594552 = sum of:
0.044594552 = product of:
0.089189105 = sum of:
0.089189105 = weight(_text_:t in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089189105 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Vocabulary as a central concept in digital libraries: interdisciplinary concepts, challenges, and opportunities : proceedings of the Third International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Science (COLIS3), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 23-26 May 1999. Ed. by T. Arpanac et al
-
Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009)
0.02
0.021942714 = product of:
0.04388543 = sum of:
0.04388543 = product of:
0.17554171 = sum of:
0.17554171 = weight(_text_:authors in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17554171 = score(doc=3161,freq=12.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.021142727 = product of:
0.042285454 = sum of:
0.042285454 = product of:
0.08457091 = sum of:
0.08457091 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08457091 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.021142727 = product of:
0.042285454 = sum of:
0.042285454 = product of:
0.08457091 = sum of:
0.08457091 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08457091 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
-
Dang, E.K.F.; Luk, R.W.P.; Allan, J.; Ho, K.S.; Chung, K.F.L.; Lee, D.L.: ¬A new context-dependent term weight computed by boost and discount using relevance information (2010)
0.02
0.019310007 = product of:
0.038620014 = sum of:
0.038620014 = product of:
0.07724003 = sum of:
0.07724003 = weight(_text_:t in 4120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07724003 = score(doc=4120,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.37693518 = fieldWeight in 4120, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We studied the effectiveness of a new class of context-dependent term weights for information retrieval. Unlike the traditional term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), the new weighting of a term t in a document d depends not only on the occurrence statistics of t alone but also on the terms found within a text window (or "document-context") centered on t. We introduce a Boost and Discount (B&D) procedure which utilizes partial relevance information to compute the context-dependent term weights of query terms according to a logistic regression model. We investigate the effectiveness of the new term weights compared with the context-independent BM25 weights in the setting of relevance feedback. We performed experiments with title queries of the TREC-6, -7, -8, and 2005 collections, comparing the residual Mean Average Precision (MAP) measures obtained using B&D term weights and those obtained by a baseline using BM25 weights. Given either 10 or 20 relevance judgments of the top retrieved documents, using the new term weights yields improvement over the baseline for all collections tested. The MAP obtained with the new weights has relative improvement over the baseline by 3.3 to 15.2%, with statistical significance at the 95% confidence level across all four collections.
-
Gonnet, G.H.; Snider, T.; Baeza-Yates, R.A.: New indices for text : PAT trees and PAT arrays (1992)
0.02
0.01783782 = product of:
0.03567564 = sum of:
0.03567564 = product of:
0.07135128 = sum of:
0.07135128 = weight(_text_:t in 3500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07135128 = score(doc=3500,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 3500, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3500)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mandl, T.: Web- und Multimedia-Dokumente : Neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen (2003)
0.02
0.01783782 = product of:
0.03567564 = sum of:
0.03567564 = product of:
0.07135128 = sum of:
0.07135128 = weight(_text_:t in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07135128 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Behnert, C.; Borst, T.: Neue Formen der Relevanz-Sortierung in bibliothekarischen Informationssystemen : das DFG-Projekt LibRank (2015)
0.02
0.01783782 = product of:
0.03567564 = sum of:
0.03567564 = product of:
0.07135128 = sum of:
0.07135128 = weight(_text_:t in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07135128 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ruthven, T.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, K.van: Incorporating user research behavior into relevance feedback (2003)
0.02
0.015766555 = product of:
0.03153311 = sum of:
0.03153311 = product of:
0.06306622 = sum of:
0.06306622 = weight(_text_:t in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06306622 = score(doc=5169,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ruthven, Mounia, and van Rijsbergen rank and select terms for query expansion using information gathered on searcher evaluation behavior. Using the TREC Financial Times and Los Angeles Times collections and search topics from TREC-6 placed in simulated work situations, six student subjects each preformed three searches on an experimental system and three on a control system with instructions to search by natural language expression in any way they found comfortable. Searching was analyzed for behavior differences between experimental and control situations, and for effectiveness and perceptions. In three experiments paired t-tests were the analysis tool with controls being a no relevance feedback system, a standard ranking for automatic expansion system, and a standard ranking for interactive expansion while the experimental systems based ranking upon user information on temporal relevance and partial relevance. Two further experiments compare using user behavior (number assessed relevant and similarity of relevant documents) to choose a query expansion technique against a non-selective technique and finally the effect of providing the user with knowledge of the process. When partial relevance data and time of assessment data are incorporated in term ranking more relevant documents were recovered in fewer iterations, however retrieval effectiveness overall was not improved. The subjects, none-the-less, rated the suggested terms as more useful and used them more heavily. Explanations of what the feedback techniques were doing led to higher use of the techniques.
-
Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019)
0.02
0.015608093 = product of:
0.031216186 = sum of:
0.031216186 = product of:
0.06243237 = sum of:
0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06243237 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011)
0.02
0.015515843 = product of:
0.031031687 = sum of:
0.031031687 = product of:
0.12412675 = sum of:
0.12412675 = weight(_text_:authors in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12412675 = score(doc=4348,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking authors is vital for identifying a researcher's impact and standing within a scientific field. There are many different ranking methods (e.g., citations, publications, h-index, PageRank, and weighted PageRank), but most of them are topic-independent. This paper proposes topic-dependent ranks based on the combination of a topic model and a weighted PageRank algorithm. The author-conference-topic (ACT) model was used to extract topic distribution of individual authors. Two ways for combining the ACT model with the PageRank algorithm are proposed: simple combination (I_PR) or using a topic distribution as a weighted vector for PageRank (PR_t). Information retrieval was chosen as the test field and representative authors for different topics at different time phases were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the ranking difference between I_PR and PR_t.
-
MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004)
0.01
0.014095151 = product of:
0.028190302 = sum of:
0.028190302 = product of:
0.056380603 = sum of:
0.056380603 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056380603 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 18:30:22
-
Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992)
0.01
0.014095151 = product of:
0.028190302 = sum of:
0.028190302 = product of:
0.056380603 = sum of:
0.056380603 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056380603 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 5.1999 15:22:48
