Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.08 
    0.08056636 = product of:
  0.16113272 = sum of:
    0.16113272 = sum of:
      0.11264306 = weight(_text_:z in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11264306 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.048489656 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048489656 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  2. Chen, Z.; Fu, B.: On the complexity of Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm (2007) 0.06 
    0.06098309 = sum of:
  0.020753428 = product of:
    0.08301371 = sum of:
      0.08301371 = weight(_text_:authors in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08301371 = score(doc=578,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.040229663 = product of:
    0.08045933 = sum of:
      0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08045933 = score(doc=578,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm, one of the most important query reformation methods in information retrieval, is essentially an adaptive learning algorithm from examples in searching for documents represented by a linear classifier. Despite its popularity in various applications, there is little rigorous analysis of its learning complexity in literature. In this article, the authors prove for the first time that the learning complexity of Rocchio's algorithm is O(d + d**2(log d + log n)) over the discretized vector space {0, ... , n - 1 }**d when the inner product similarity measure is used. The upper bound on the learning complexity for searching for documents represented by a monotone linear classifier (q, 0) over {0, ... , n - 1 }d can be improved to, at most, 1 + 2k (n - 1) (log d + log(n - 1)), where k is the number of nonzero components in q. Several lower bounds on the learning complexity are also obtained for Rocchio's algorithm. For example, the authors prove that Rocchio's algorithm has a lower bound Omega((d über 2)log n) on its learning complexity over the Boolean vector space {0,1}**d.
  3. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.04 
    0.038071163 = sum of:
  0.020753428 = product of:
    0.08301371 = sum of:
      0.08301371 = weight(_text_:authors in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08301371 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017317735 = product of:
    0.03463547 = sum of:
      0.03463547 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03463547 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A new challenge, accessing multiple relevant entities, arises from the availability of linked heterogeneous data. In this article, we address more specifically the problem of accessing relevant entities, such as publications and authors within a bibliographic network, given an information need. We propose a novel algorithm, called BibRank, that estimates a joint relevance of documents and authors within a bibliographic network. This model ranks each type of entity using a score propagation algorithm with respect to the query topic and the structure of the underlying bi-type information entity network. Evidence sources, namely content-based and network-based scores, are both used to estimate the topical similarity between connected entities. For this purpose, authorship relationships are analyzed through a language model-based score on the one hand and on the other hand, non topically related entities of the same type are detected through marginal citations. The article reports the results of experiments using the Bibrank algorithm for an information retrieval task. The CiteSeerX bibliographic data set forms the basis for the topical query automatic generation and evaluation. We show that a statistically significant improvement over closely related ranking models is achieved.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
  4. Longshu, L.; Xia, Z.: On an aproximate fuzzy information retrieval agent (1998) 0.03 
    0.032183733 = product of:
  0.064367466 = sum of:
    0.064367466 = product of:
      0.12873493 = sum of:
        0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12873493 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Behnert, C.; Borst, T.: Neue Formen der Relevanz-Sortierung in bibliothekarischen Informationssystemen : das DFG-Projekt LibRank (2015) 0.03 
    0.032183733 = product of:
  0.064367466 = sum of:
    0.064367466 = product of:
      0.12873493 = sum of:
        0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12873493 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Das von der DFG geförderte Projekt LibRank erforscht neue Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme, die aufbauend auf Erkenntnissen aus dem Bereich Websuche qualitätsinduzierende Faktoren wie z. B. Aktualität, Popularität und Verfügbarkeit von einzelnen Medien berücksichtigen. Die konzipierten Verfahren werden im Kontext eines in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften häufig genutzten Rechercheportals (EconBiz) entwickelt und in einem Testsystem systematisch evaluiert. Es werden Rankingfaktoren, die für den Bibliotheksbereich von besonderem Interesse sind, vorgestellt und exemplarisch Probleme und Herausforderungen aufgezeigt.
  6. Pan, M.; Huang, J.X.; He, T.; Mao, Z.; Ying, Z.; Tu, X.: ¬A simple kernel co-occurrence-based enhancement for pseudo-relevance feedback (2020) 0.03 
    0.028446669 = product of:
  0.056893338 = sum of:
    0.056893338 = product of:
      0.113786675 = sum of:
        0.113786675 = weight(_text_:z in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113786675 = score(doc=5678,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018) 0.03 
    0.028160766 = product of:
  0.05632153 = sum of:
    0.05632153 = product of:
      0.11264306 = sum of:
        0.11264306 = weight(_text_:z in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11264306 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discovery-Systeme bieten meist als Standardeinstellung eine Sortierung nach Relevanz an. Wie die Relevanz ermittelt wird, ist häufig intransparent. Dabei wären Kenntnisse darüber aus Nutzersicht ein wichtiger Faktor in der Informationskompetenz, während Bibliotheken sicherstellen sollten, dass das Ranking zum eigenen Bestand und Publikum passt. In diesem Aufsatz wird dargestellt, wie Discovery-Systeme Treffer auswählen und bewerten. Dazu gehören Indexierung, Prozessierung, Text-Matching und weitere Relevanzkriterien, z. B. Popularität oder Verfügbarkeit. Schließlich müssen alle betrachteten Kriterien zu einem zentralen Score zusammengefasst werden. Ein besonderer Fokus wird auf das Ranking von EBSCO Discovery Service, Primo und Summon gelegt.
  8. Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019) 0.03 
    0.028160766 = product of:
  0.05632153 = sum of:
    0.05632153 = product of:
      0.11264306 = sum of:
        0.11264306 = weight(_text_:z in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11264306 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt eine Studie zur Entwicklung und Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme. Dazu wurden mögliche Faktoren für das Relevanzranking ausgehend von den Verfahren in Websuchmaschinen identifiziert, auf den Bibliothekskontext übertragen und systematisch evaluiert. Mithilfe eines Testsystems, das auf dem ZBW-Informationsportal EconBiz und einer web-basierten Software zur Evaluierung von Suchsystemen aufsetzt, wurden verschiedene Relevanzfaktoren (z. B. Popularität in Verbindung mit Aktualität) getestet. Obwohl die getesteten Rankingverfahren auf einer theoretischen Ebene divers sind, konnten keine einheitlichen Verbesserungen gegenüber den Baseline-Rankings gemessen werden. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass eine Adaptierung des Rankings auf individuelle Nutzer bzw. Nutzungskontexte notwendig sein könnte, um eine höhere Performance zu erzielen.
  9. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03 
    0.027708376 = product of:
  0.05541675 = sum of:
    0.05541675 = product of:
      0.1108335 = sum of:
        0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1108335 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  10. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02 
    0.024244828 = product of:
  0.048489656 = sum of:
    0.048489656 = product of:
      0.09697931 = sum of:
        0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09697931 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  11. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02 
    0.024244828 = product of:
  0.048489656 = sum of:
    0.048489656 = product of:
      0.09697931 = sum of:
        0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09697931 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  12. Li, H.; Wu, H.; Li, D.; Lin, S.; Su, Z.; Luo, X.: PSI: A probabilistic semantic interpretable framework for fine-grained image ranking (2018) 0.02 
    0.0241378 = product of:
  0.0482756 = sum of:
    0.0482756 = product of:
      0.0965512 = sum of:
        0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0965512 = score(doc=4577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.02 
    0.022394836 = sum of:
  0.010272422 = product of:
    0.041089687 = sum of:
      0.041089687 = weight(_text_:authors in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041089687 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.012122414 = product of:
    0.024244828 = sum of:
      0.024244828 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024244828 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A relevancy-ranking algorithm for a natural language interface to Boolean online public access catalogs (OPACs) was formulated and compared with that currently used in a knowledge-based search interface called the E-Referencer, being developed by the authors. The algorithm makes use of seven weIl-known ranking criteria: breadth of match, section weighting, proximity of query words, variant word forms (stemming), document frequency, term frequency and document length. The algorithm converts a natural language query into a series of increasingly broader Boolean search statements. In a small experiment with ten subjects in which the algorithm was simulated by hand, the algorithm obtained good results with a mean overall precision of 0.42 and mean average precision of 0.62, representing a 27 percent improvement in precision and 41 percent improvement in average precision compared to the E-Referencer. The usefulness of each step in the algorithm was analyzed and suggestions are made for improving the algorithm.
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  14. Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009) 0.02 
    0.021567592 = product of:
  0.043135185 = sum of:
    0.043135185 = product of:
      0.17254074 = sum of:
        0.17254074 = weight(_text_:authors in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17254074 = score(doc=3161,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
  15. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02 
    0.02078128 = product of:
  0.04156256 = sum of:
    0.04156256 = product of:
      0.08312512 = sum of:
        0.08312512 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08312512 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  16. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02 
    0.02078128 = product of:
  0.04156256 = sum of:
    0.04156256 = product of:
      0.08312512 = sum of:
        0.08312512 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08312512 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  17. Chen, Z.; Meng, X.; Fowler, R.H.; Zhu, B.: Real-time adaptive feature and document learning for Web search (2001) 0.02 
    0.020114832 = product of:
  0.040229663 = sum of:
    0.040229663 = product of:
      0.08045933 = sum of:
        0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 5209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08045933 = score(doc=5209,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 5209, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5209)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Li, M.; Li, H.; Zhou, Z.-H.: Semi-supervised document retrieval (2009) 0.02 
    0.020114832 = product of:
  0.040229663 = sum of:
    0.040229663 = product of:
      0.08045933 = sum of:
        0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08045933 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Tsai, C.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Y.: Factors affecting rocchio-based pseudorelevance feedback in image retrieval (2015) 0.02 
    0.020114832 = product of:
  0.040229663 = sum of:
    0.040229663 = product of:
      0.08045933 = sum of:
        0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08045933 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  20. Ye, Z.; Huang, J.X.: ¬A learning to rank approach for quality-aware pseudo-relevance feedback (2016) 0.02 
    0.020114832 = product of:
  0.040229663 = sum of:
    0.040229663 = product of:
      0.08045933 = sum of:
        0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08045933 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 7
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 52
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications