Search (92 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.09
    0.0906182 = product of:
      0.1812364 = sum of:
        0.1812364 = sum of:
          0.081838466 = weight(_text_:j in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.081838466 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.099397935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099397935 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  2. Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009) 0.06
    0.061747774 = sum of:
      0.04421096 = product of:
        0.17684384 = sum of:
          0.17684384 = weight(_text_:authors in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17684384 = score(doc=3161,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017536815 = product of:
        0.03507363 = sum of:
          0.03507363 = weight(_text_:j in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03507363 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
  3. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.04
    0.039020643 = sum of:
      0.021271009 = product of:
        0.085084036 = sum of:
          0.085084036 = weight(_text_:authors in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.085084036 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017749632 = product of:
        0.035499264 = sum of:
          0.035499264 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035499264 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A new challenge, accessing multiple relevant entities, arises from the availability of linked heterogeneous data. In this article, we address more specifically the problem of accessing relevant entities, such as publications and authors within a bibliographic network, given an information need. We propose a novel algorithm, called BibRank, that estimates a joint relevance of documents and authors within a bibliographic network. This model ranks each type of entity using a score propagation algorithm with respect to the query topic and the structure of the underlying bi-type information entity network. Evidence sources, namely content-based and network-based scores, are both used to estimate the topical similarity between connected entities. For this purpose, authorship relationships are analyzed through a language model-based score on the one hand and on the other hand, non topically related entities of the same type are detected through marginal citations. The article reports the results of experiments using the Bibrank algorithm for an information retrieval task. The CiteSeerX bibliographic data set forms the basis for the topical query automatic generation and evaluation. We show that a statistically significant improvement over closely related ranking models is achieved.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
  4. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.04
    0.038836375 = product of:
      0.07767275 = sum of:
        0.07767275 = sum of:
          0.03507363 = weight(_text_:j in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03507363 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.042599116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042599116 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
  5. Lin, J.; Katz, B.: Building a reusable test collection for question answering (2006) 0.04
    0.035585865 = sum of:
      0.018049048 = product of:
        0.07219619 = sum of:
          0.07219619 = weight(_text_:authors in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07219619 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017536815 = product of:
        0.03507363 = sum of:
          0.03507363 = weight(_text_:j in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03507363 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In contrast to traditional information retrieval systems, which return ranked lists of documents that users must manually browse through, a question answering system attempts to directly answer natural language questions posed by the user. Although such systems possess language-processing capabilities, they still rely on traditional document retrieval techniques to generate an initial candidate set of documents. In this article, the authors argue that document retrieval for question answering represents a task different from retrieving documents in response to more general retrospective information needs. Thus, to guide future system development, specialized question answering test collections must be constructed. They show that the current evaluation resources have major shortcomings; to remedy the situation, they have manually created a small, reusable question answering test collection for research purposes. In this article they describe their methodology for building this test collection and discuss issues they encountered regarding the notion of "answer correctness."
  6. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03
    0.028399412 = product of:
      0.056798823 = sum of:
        0.056798823 = product of:
          0.11359765 = sum of:
            0.11359765 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11359765 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  7. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.024849484 = product of:
      0.049698967 = sum of:
        0.049698967 = product of:
          0.099397935 = sum of:
            0.099397935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099397935 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  8. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.02
    0.022953354 = sum of:
      0.010528612 = product of:
        0.042114448 = sum of:
          0.042114448 = weight(_text_:authors in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042114448 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012424742 = product of:
        0.024849484 = sum of:
          0.024849484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024849484 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052402776 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A relevancy-ranking algorithm for a natural language interface to Boolean online public access catalogs (OPACs) was formulated and compared with that currently used in a knowledge-based search interface called the E-Referencer, being developed by the authors. The algorithm makes use of seven weIl-known ranking criteria: breadth of match, section weighting, proximity of query words, variant word forms (stemming), document frequency, term frequency and document length. The algorithm converts a natural language query into a series of increasingly broader Boolean search statements. In a small experiment with ten subjects in which the algorithm was simulated by hand, the algorithm obtained good results with a mean overall precision of 0.42 and mean average precision of 0.62, representing a 27 percent improvement in precision and 41 percent improvement in average precision compared to the E-Referencer. The usefulness of each step in the algorithm was analyzed and suggestions are made for improving the algorithm.
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  9. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.021299558 = product of:
      0.042599116 = sum of:
        0.042599116 = product of:
          0.08519823 = sum of:
            0.08519823 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08519823 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  10. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.021299558 = product of:
      0.042599116 = sum of:
        0.042599116 = product of:
          0.08519823 = sum of:
            0.08519823 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08519823 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  11. Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001) 0.02
    0.020459617 = product of:
      0.040919233 = sum of:
        0.040919233 = product of:
          0.081838466 = sum of:
            0.081838466 = weight(_text_:j in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081838466 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Savoy, J.; Ndarugendamwo, M.; Vrajitoru, D.: Report on the TREC-4 experiment : combining probabilistic and vector-space schemes (1996) 0.02
    0.017536815 = product of:
      0.03507363 = sum of:
        0.03507363 = product of:
          0.07014726 = sum of:
            0.07014726 = weight(_text_:j in 7574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07014726 = score(doc=7574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 7574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Belkin, N.J.; Cool, C.; Koenemann, J.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: Using relevance feedback and ranking in interactive searching (1996) 0.02
    0.017536815 = product of:
      0.03507363 = sum of:
        0.03507363 = product of:
          0.07014726 = sum of:
            0.07014726 = weight(_text_:j in 7588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07014726 = score(doc=7588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 7588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011) 0.02
    0.015630936 = product of:
      0.031261873 = sum of:
        0.031261873 = product of:
          0.12504749 = sum of:
            0.12504749 = weight(_text_:authors in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12504749 = score(doc=4348,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ranking authors is vital for identifying a researcher's impact and standing within a scientific field. There are many different ranking methods (e.g., citations, publications, h-index, PageRank, and weighted PageRank), but most of them are topic-independent. This paper proposes topic-dependent ranks based on the combination of a topic model and a weighted PageRank algorithm. The author-conference-topic (ACT) model was used to extract topic distribution of individual authors. Two ways for combining the ACT model with the PageRank algorithm are proposed: simple combination (I_PR) or using a topic distribution as a weighted vector for PageRank (PR_t). Information retrieval was chosen as the test field and representative authors for different topics at different time phases were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the ranking difference between I_PR and PR_t.
  15. Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: ¬The hw-rank : an h-index variant for ranking web pages (2015) 0.01
    0.014614012 = product of:
      0.029228024 = sum of:
        0.029228024 = product of:
          0.05845605 = sum of:
            0.05845605 = weight(_text_:j in 1694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05845605 = score(doc=1694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1694)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015) 0.01
    0.014614012 = product of:
      0.029228024 = sum of:
        0.029228024 = product of:
          0.05845605 = sum of:
            0.05845605 = weight(_text_:j in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05845605 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Roh, J.-E.; Lee, J.-H.: ¬An empirical study of query expansion and cluster-based retrieval in language modeling approach (2007) 0.01
    0.014467134 = product of:
      0.028934268 = sum of:
        0.028934268 = product of:
          0.057868537 = sum of:
            0.057868537 = weight(_text_:j in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057868537 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.014199706 = product of:
      0.028399412 = sum of:
        0.028399412 = product of:
          0.056798823 = sum of:
            0.056798823 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056798823 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  19. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01
    0.014199706 = product of:
      0.028399412 = sum of:
        0.028399412 = product of:
          0.056798823 = sum of:
            0.056798823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056798823 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  20. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.014199706 = product of:
      0.028399412 = sum of:
        0.028399412 = product of:
          0.056798823 = sum of:
            0.056798823 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056798823 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052402776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23

Years

Languages

  • e 85
  • d 7
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 83
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…