Barker, A.L.: Non-Boolean searching on commercial online systems : optimising use of Dialog TARGET and ESA/IRS QUESTQUORUM (1995)
0.00
0.0048642363 = product of:
0.034049653 = sum of:
0.012544759 = weight(_text_:information in 3853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012544759 = score(doc=3853,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05334617 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030388402 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3853, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3853)
0.021504894 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021504894 = score(doc=3853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.091922335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.030388402 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3853)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Considers 2 non-Boolean searching systems available on commercial online systems. QUESTQUORUM, based on coordination level searching, was introduced by ESA/IRS in Dec. 85. TARGET, which employs partial match probabilistic retrieval was introduced by DIALOG in Dec 93. 6 subject searches were carried out on databases available on both Dialog and ESA/IRS to compare TARGET and QUESTQUORUM with Boolean searching. Outlines the main advantages of these tools, and their disadvantages. Suggests when their use may be preferable
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes