Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalsprachen"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Barker, A.L.: Non-Boolean searching on commercial online systems : optimising use of Dialog TARGET and ESA/IRS QUESTQUORUM (1995) 0.00
    0.003861418 = product of:
      0.027029924 = sum of:
        0.027029924 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027029924 = score(doc=3853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3853)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers 2 non-Boolean searching systems available on commercial online systems. QUESTQUORUM, based on coordination level searching, was introduced by ESA/IRS in Dec. 85. TARGET, which employs partial match probabilistic retrieval was introduced by DIALOG in Dec 93. 6 subject searches were carried out on databases available on both Dialog and ESA/IRS to compare TARGET and QUESTQUORUM with Boolean searching. Outlines the main advantages of these tools, and their disadvantages. Suggests when their use may be preferable