Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.03
    0.029787809 = product of:
      0.044681713 = sum of:
        0.02029928 = weight(_text_:d in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02029928 = score(doc=261,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08547641 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044990618 = queryNorm
            0.237484 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
        0.024382431 = product of:
          0.048764862 = sum of:
            0.048764862 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048764862 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15754949 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044990618 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Language
    d
  2. Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002) 0.01
    0.005980733 = product of:
      0.017942198 = sum of:
        0.017942198 = weight(_text_:d in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017942198 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08547641 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044990618 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    d
  3. Grasso, L.L.; Wahlig, H.: Google und seine Suchparameter : Eine Top 20-Precision Analyse anhand repräsentativ ausgewählter Anfragen (2005) 0.00
    0.004784586 = product of:
      0.014353758 = sum of:
        0.014353758 = weight(_text_:d in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014353758 = score(doc=3275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08547641 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044990618 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    d
  4. Günther, M.: Vermitteln Suchmaschinen vollständige Bilder aktueller Themen? : Untersuchung der Gewichtung inhaltlicher Aspekte von Suchmaschinenergebnissen in Deutschland und den USA (2016) 0.00
    0.004229017 = product of:
      0.012687051 = sum of:
        0.012687051 = weight(_text_:d in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012687051 = score(doc=3068,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08547641 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044990618 = queryNorm
            0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  5. Griesbaum, J.: Evaluierung hybrider Suchsysteme im WWW (2000) 0.00
    0.0035884394 = product of:
      0.010765318 = sum of:
        0.010765318 = weight(_text_:d in 2482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010765318 = score(doc=2482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08547641 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044990618 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2482)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    d
  6. Schaer, P.; Mayr, P.; Sünkler, S.; Lewandowski, D.: How relevant is the long tail? : a relevance assessment study on million short (2016) 0.00
    0.0029903664 = product of:
      0.008971099 = sum of:
        0.008971099 = weight(_text_:d in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008971099 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08547641 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044990618 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)