-
Leppanen, E.: Homografiongelma tekstihaussa ja homografien disambiguoinnin vaikutukset (1996)
0.01
0.008966145 = product of:
0.03586458 = sum of:
0.027436804 = product of:
0.08231041 = sum of:
0.08231041 = weight(_text_:problem in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08231041 = score(doc=27,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.6291675 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.008427775 = product of:
0.025283325 = sum of:
0.025283325 = weight(_text_:29 in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025283325 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Homonymy is known to often cause false drops in free text searching in a full text database. The problem is quite common and difficult to avoid in Finnish, but nobody has examined it before. Reports on a study that examined the frequency of, and solutions to, the homonymy problem, based on searches made in a Finnish full text database containing about 55.000 newspaper articles. The results indicate that homonymy is not a very serious problem in full text searching, with only about 1 search result set out of 4 containing false drops caused by homonymy. Several other reasons for nonrelevance were much more common. However, in some set results there were a considerable number of homonymy errors, so the number seems to be very random. A study was also made into whether homonyms can be disambiguated by syntactic analysis. The result was that 75,2% of homonyms were disambiguated by this method. Verb homonyms were considerably easier to disambiguate than substantives. Although homonymy is not a very big problem it could perhaps easily be eliminated if there was a suitable syntactic analyzer in the IR system
- Date
- 9.12.1997 18:33:29
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: The homonymy problem in free text searching and the results of homonymy disambiguation
-
Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985)
0.00
0.0017557865 = product of:
0.014046292 = sum of:
0.014046292 = product of:
0.042138875 = sum of:
0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042138875 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
-
Kristensen, J.: Expanding end-users' query statements for free text searching with a search-aid thesaurus (1993)
0.00
0.0014046291 = product of:
0.011237033 = sum of:
0.011237033 = product of:
0.033711098 = sum of:
0.033711098 = weight(_text_:29 in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033711098 = score(doc=6621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.6, S.733-744
-
Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986)
0.00
0.0010534719 = product of:
0.008427775 = sum of:
0.008427775 = product of:
0.025283325 = sum of:
0.025283325 = weight(_text_:29 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025283325 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: An evaluation ... Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299; Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.648-656; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
-
Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989)
0.00
0.0010439953 = product of:
0.008351962 = sum of:
0.008351962 = product of:
0.025055885 = sum of:
0.025055885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025055885 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030822188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Date
- 9. 1.1996 10:22:31
